Hearth Record

Fresenius Kidney Care Sugarland Home

A dialysis facility in Sugar Land, Texas 77479

4675 Sweetwater Blvd, Suite B, Sugar Land, Texas 77479. (281) 240-4076.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 30, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 30, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 433 words

    “POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility’s interdisciplinary team failed to ensure participation by the patient in the Plan of Care in 2 of 9 sampled patients and 6 closed records: Patient #s 1, 8 Findings: Review of the facility’s current Policy and Procedure on Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care; Policy #45283, published 07/03/2023 directs staff as follows: “Comprehensive Assessment Participation and Plan of Care Review “ The patient’s level of participation is determined by the patient. The patient must sign the plan of care meant to acknowledge the information in the plan. If the patient chooses not to sign their plan of care, the reason for refusal must be documented in the patient’s medical record.” Patient #1 Review of the patient’s clinical record on 06/30/2025 revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 04/09/2024 with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia, on home peritoneal dialysis seven times a week. Review of the patient’s current Plan of Care revealed it was signed by the physician, registered nurse, registered dietitian, and social worker on 07/15/2024. The Plan of Care was not signed and dated by the patient. During the record review, surveyor requested documentation that the patient participated in the plan of care meeting. There was no documentation provided. Patient #8 Review of the patient’s clinical record on 06/30/2025 revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 07/02/2024 with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia, on home hemodialysis five times a week. Review of the patient’s current Plan of Care revealed it was signed by the registered nurse, registered dietitian, and social worker on 10/29/2024. The Plan of Care was signed by the physician on 11/04/2024. The Plan of Care was not signed and dated by the patient. During the record review, surveyor requested documentation that the patient participated in the plan of care meeting. There was no documentation provided. Interview with Home Therapies Area Team Lead (H) on 06/30/2025 at 4:25 p.m. confirmed the Plan of Care for the patients above were not signed.”

    Rule V0556. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patients Seen By Med Staff Member Monthly

    The inspectors’ words, 419 words

    “POC-PTS SEEN BY MED STAFF 1X/MO CFR(s): 494.90(b)(4) The dialysis facility must ensure that all dialysis patients are seen by a physician, nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist or physician’s assistant providing ESRD care at least monthly, as evidenced by a monthly progress note placed in the medical record, and periodically while the hemodialysis patient is receiving in-facility dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, interview and record review, patients’ attending nephrologists failed to complete monthly comprehensive progress notes on patients addressing adequacy, dialysis access, anemia management, nutritional status, bone mineral metabolism and treatment response in 4 of 9 sampled patients and 6 closed records: Patient #s 2, 6, 8, 9 Findings: Patient #2 Observation on 06/30/2025 at 11:09 a.m. revealed Patient #2 was seated in the hemodialysis chair being interviewed by Registered Nurse (B). Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 11/27/2024 with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease and hypertension, on home peritoneal dialysis seven times a week. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the most current monthly physician progress note was dated 04/17/2025. There were no monthly comprehensive progress notes documented for May 2025 or June 2025. Patient #6 Review of the patient’s clinical record on 06/30/2025 revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 09/20/2019 with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia on peritoneal dialysis seven times a week. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the most current monthly physician progress note was dated 06/16/2025. There was no monthly comprehensive progress notes documented for April 2025. Patient #8 Review of the patient’s clinical record on 06/30/2025 revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 07/02/2024 with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia, on home hemodialysis five times a week. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the most current monthly physician progress note was dated 06/23/2025. There was no monthly comprehensive progress notes documented for April 2025. Patient #9 Review of the patient’s clinical record on 06/30/2025 revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 02/18/2025 with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease and hypertension, on home hemodialysis five times a week. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the most current monthly physician progress note was dated 03/31/2025. There were no monthly comprehensive progress notes documented for April 2025 - June 2025. Interview with Clinical Manager (A) on 06/30/2025 at 4:10 p.m. confirmed the findings above.”

    Rule V0560. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 30, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Aug 9, 2018.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 9 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, better than expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 32 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Fort Bend County, 29 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5, 13 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 9 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.