Fmc - Village Oaks Kidney Disease Clinic
A dialysis facility in Live Oak, Texas 78233
11701 Toepperwein Rd, Live Oak, Texas 78233. (210) 655-4005.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 28 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 6, 2024: a complaint and standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 6, 2024: complaint and standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 223 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27438 Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility’s policy, the facility failed to ensure the staff removed expired medication from the medication storage cabinet. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the potency of the medication and could affect all 115 in-center hemodialysis patients receiving treatment at this facility. Findings include: Observation of the facility’s medication preparation area on 11/04/24 at 3:30 PM showed the following expired injectable medications: four single-use vials of diphenhydramine HCL (used to treat life-threatening allergic reactions) injection-50 mg/ml (measurement of dose) with an expiration date of 10/2024 stored adjacent to nonexpired medications. During an interview on 11/04/24 at 11:55 AM, the Registered Nurse (RN)2 stated the medications are monitored on a monthly basis and the expired medication should be removed prior to expiration. A review of the facility’s policy titled, “Medication Preparation and Administration,” revised 02/06/2023, indicated, “Monitoring Expired Medications: Expiration dates for all stored medications are to be monitored on the monthly basis. Expired medications are to be discarded via Fresenius Kidney Care off-site return program or in accordance with local and/or state law.””
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 715 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26190 27438 Based on record reviews, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the individualized dialysis (an artificial means of kidney function that removes the waste and excess fluid from the blood by passing through a filter) prescription as determined by the medical provider for three of ten in-center patients (Patient (P)7, P9, and P10). Failure to follow the medical providers dialysis prescription had the potential to negatively impact the effectiveness of the prescribed dialysis treatments for all 115 patients receiving in-center dialysis treatments at this facility. Findings include: 1. Review of P7’s “Treatment Sheet” forms, found in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed one of six printed “Treatment Sheet” forms from 10/21/24 through 11/04/24, indicated the following: On 10/23/24, the staff failed to follow the dialysis prescription Blood Flow Rate (BFR) of 400 milliliters per minute (ml/min) when during the threehour treatment the BFR remained at 350 ml/min. There was no documented rationale for the change to the prescribed BFR. 2. Review of P9’s “Treatment Summary” forms, found in the EMR), revealed four of six printed “Treatment Data” forms from 10/21/24 through 11/01/24, indicated the following: a. On 10/21/24, the staff failed to follow the dialysis prescription Dialysis Flow Rate (DFR) of 800 ml/min when during the three-hour treatment the DFR remained at 700 ml/min. There was no documented rationale for the change to the prescribed DFR. b. On 10/23/24, the staff failed to follow the dialysis prescription DFR of 800 ml/min when during the 4-hour treatment the DFR remained at 700 ml/min. There was no documented rationale for the change in the prescribed DFR. c. On 10/28/24, the staff failed to follow the dialysis prescription DFR of 800 ml/min when during the 4.0-hour treatment the DFR remained at 700 ml/min. There was no documented rationale for the change to the prescribed DFR. d. On 10/30/24, the staff failed to follow the dialysis prescription Blood Flow Rate (BFR) of 450 ml/min and the DFR of 800 ml/min when during the 4.0-hour treatment the BFR remained at 375 ml/min and the DFR remained at 600 ml/min. There was no documented rationale for the change to the prescribed BFR and DFR. 3. Review of P10’s “Treatment Sheet” forms, found in the EMR, revealed two of six printed “Treatment Sheet” forms from 10/21/24 through 11/04/24, indicated the following: a. On 10/21/24, the staff failed to follow the dialysis prescription DFR of 800 ml/min when during the treatment time from 8:16 AM until 10:35 AM (139 minutes) of the three hour and 45-minute treatment, when the DFR remained at 600 ml/min. There was no documented rationale for the change to the prescribed DFR. b. On 10/23/24, the staff failed to follow the dialysis prescription DFR of 800 ml/min when during the 3 hour and 45-minute treatment the DFR remained at 600 ml/min. There was no documented rationale for the change to the prescribed DFR. During an interview on 11/06/24 at 8:05 AM, the Clinical Manager reviewed and verified the discrepancy between the prescription and machine generated “Treatment Sheet” forms for P7, P9, and P10 forms revealed that he/she expects staff to monitor and document the DFR and BFR findings every 30 minutes and all treatment prescriptions for patients to be followed or have documentation on why the prescription was not followed. During an interview on 11/06/24 at 9:40 AM, the Registered Nurse (RN)3 reviewed the DFR findings for P10 and verified the discrepancy between the prescription and machine generated DFR and required staff observation documentation. The RN3 verified staff are required to document patient observations along with machine settings every 30 minutes and make corrections if needed. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” revised 05/01/2023, indicated, “During Treatment...Document machine parameters and safety checks every 30 or more often as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations ...Check prescribed blood flow is being achieved or reason is documented in the medical record if unable to meet prescribed blood flow. Check dialysate flow rate setting is correct, and the prescribed flow is being delivered.””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2024 | Complaint and standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 17, 1998.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 28 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (50 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 74% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 57 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Bexar County, 54 have a star rating from CMS: 10 rated 5 of 5, 23 rated 4 of 5, 19 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.