Davita San Antonio West Dialysis
A dialysis facility in San Antonio, Texas 78228
4530 Callaghan Road, San Antonio, Texas 78228. (210) 431-9048.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 13, 2025: a standard inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 13, 2025: standard inspection6 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Compliance With Fed/State/Local Laws
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“CFC-COMPLIANCE WITH FED/STATE/LOCAL LAWS CFR(s): 494.20 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 45179 Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility was not in compliance with applicable Federal and State regulatory licensing requirements relevant to patient health and safety. Specifically, the facility’s Governing Body failed to ensure: 1) the dietitian met the required ratio of no more than 125 patients; in accordance with TAC 117.45(g)(5). The facility’s RD was providing services for 141 patients. Refer to State Tag E-0843 for specific evidence. 2) the licensed social worker met the required ratio of no more than 125 patients; in accordance with TAC 117.45(h)(5). The facility’s LMSW (Licensed Master Social Worker) was providing services for 147 patients. Refer to State Tag E-0851 for specific evidence.”
-
Ic - Sanitary Environment
The inspectors’ words, 776 words
“IC-SANITARY ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.30 The dialysis facility must provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within and between the unit and any adjacent hospital or other public areas. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26870 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to monitor and maintain a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within the dialysis center. These findings have the likelihood to cause harm by increasing the risk of infection to all patients receiving care at the dialysis facility. Findings Include: Observations conducted during a tour of the facility on 8/12/25 at 11:00AM revealed the following: 11:15AM tour of the facility supple room revealed a dust like appearance in the plastic container of iodine pads. The floors in the supply room had a dust like appearance. The plastic pallets in the supply room also had a dust like appearance on the pallets as well as between the pallet slats. The floor in the Biomed office had a very dust like appearance. Clean equipment “ready for use” for patients, was stored in the Biomed office. 11:21 AM tour of the facility water room revealed water damaged ceiling tiles. On the ceiling was a metal grid securing and holding up the ceiling tiles, the metal grid had a “orange/born” rust like color to it. One ceiling tile had black/gray colored spots on the ceiling tile. A floor base board was lifting up exposing a rust like appearance. Plastic pallets in the water room had a dust like appearance on the plastic pallets and between the plastic pallet slats. Interview with the Facility Administrator (FA) at the time of the observation stated, “We have put in many tickets to get this fixed.” 11:30AM walking through the facility supply room revealed the plastic ceiling light covers had what appeared to be “insect silhouettes”. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation revealed the FA also noticed the appearance of insects through the clear light cover. 11:40AM during the tour of the facility clinic floor revealed all the Computer on Wheels (COW) through out the clinic floor had a dust particle appearance on the keyboard. 11:45AM surveyor had FA open chair #10 chair #17, and, chair #17. The open chairs had a dusty and rust like appearance through out the chair frame. Chair #10 had a dusty like appearance on the frame and a candy wrapper was noted. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation revealed she saw the observation. 11:52AM surveyor opened wall boxes at station 19- 24, which revealed syringe caps underneath the wall boxes on the floor; within the wall boxes were dust like particles, cob webs and bugs. 12:00PM Blood pressure cuffs at Pod 5, Pod 6, Pod 9, Pod 15, and Pod 17 revealed what appeared to have white fabric like debris stuck on the Velcro of the blood pressure cuff which was ready for patient use. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation confirmed the findings. 12:15PM during the tour of the Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) floor revealed the following: 12:18PM Surveyors had the FA open the PD chair which revealed the metal frame of the chair to be covered in a dust like substance. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation confirmed the findings. 12:28PM observation the facility PD Supply closet revealed the floor had a dust like appearance, Clean supplies were stored over the dirty sink, a pair of scissors with a orange/brown rust like appearance was mixed in the drawer of patient supplies. 12:35PM Observation of the PD refrigerator revealed the refrigerator was unlocked.; 41 boxes of medication, Mircera, was kept inside the unlocked refrigerator. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation confirmed the findings. 12:40PM Surveyors noticed a long crack, about 3 feet in length over the PD/Home Training room door frame. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation revealed they were aware of the crack and had put in many tickets to get the crack repaired. Interview with S#2 at the time of the observation revealed that they have been trying to get these things repaired and now that the facility is being surveyed it will become a priority to the leadership that approves work orders. 12:42PM observation inside the PD/Home Training room, surveyor saw a supply cart in room with multiple rust like areas on the stainless steel shelves. Record review of the facility policy titled Physical Environment states in part....The dialysis facility will be....maintained to provide dialysis patients, teammates and the public a safe, functional and comfortable treatment environment.”
-
Softeners - Automatically Regenerated/Timers/Salt/Salt Level
The inspectors’ words, 449 words
“SOFTENERS-AUTO REGENERATE/TIMERS/SALT LVL CFR(s): 494.40(a) 5.2.4 Softeners: auto regen/timers/salt/salt level Prior to exhaustion, softeners should be restored; that is, new exchangeable sodium ions are placed on the resin by a process known as “regeneration,” which involves exposure of the resin bed to a saturated sodium chloride solution. 5.2.4 Softeners Refer to RD62:2001, 4.3.10 Automatically regenerated water softeners: Automatically regenerated water softeners shall be fitted with a mechanism to prevent water containing the high concentrations of sodium chloride used during regeneration from entering the product water line during regeneration. The face of the timers used to control the regeneration cycle should be visible to the user. 6.2.4 Softeners Timers should be checked at the beginning of each day and should be interlocked with the RO system so that the RO is stopped when a softener regeneration cycle is initiated. The softener brine tank should be monitored daily to ensure that a saturated salt solution exists in the brine tank. Salt pellets should fill at least half the tank. Salt designated as rock salt should not be used for softener regeneration since it is not refined and typically contains sediments and other impurities that may damage O-rings and pistons and clog orifices in the softener control head. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26870 Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to check and maintain the salt pellets above the water halfway mark in the brine tank. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause the water to become hard; failure to ensure adequate salt levels in the brine tank can lead to water hardness in the system at levels unacceptable for dialysis being performed on patients. Findings include: During a tour of the facility’s water room on 08/12/2025 at 11:25 AM observed that the salt pellets were below the water level in the side of the brine tank, and the water was brown and bubbly. An interview with Staff #1 on 08/12/2025 at 11:25 AM, stated she would have to refer to biomed. Interview with Staff #2 on 8/12/25 at 1:30PM, stated he didn’t know and would refer with another biomed. Interview with Staff #4 on 8/12/25 at 1:20PM, when surveyor stated the brown and bubbly water in the brine tank concerning, Staff #4 had no comment. Interview with Staff #8 on 8/12/25 at 2:30PM, confirmed the salt pellets should cover the water where the water can not be visible. Record review of the manufacture recommendations states in part...Salt bridge prevention: The design should prevent “salt bridging”, where solidified appears to fill the tank but if actually hollow underneath. This is often achieved by ensuring proper water flow and recommending salt pellets over coarse rock salt.”
-
Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment
The inspectors’ words, 776 words
“PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26870 Based on observation and interview, dialysis facility failed to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This deficient practice has the likelihood of causing harm to dialysis patients receiving treatment at the facility due to possible exposure to infectious material. Findings Include: Observations conducted during a tour of the facility on 8/12/25 at 11:00AM revealed the following: 11:15AM tour of the facility supply room revealed a dust like appearance in the plastic container of iodine pads. The floors in the supply room had a dust like appearance. The plastic pallets in the supply room also had a dust like appearance on the pallets as well as between the pallet slats. The floor in the Biomed office had a very dust like appearance. Clean equipment “ready for use” for patients, was stored in the Biomed office. 11:21 AM tour of the facility water room revealed water damaged ceiling tiles. On the ceiling was a metal grid securing and holding up the ceiling tiles, the metal grid had a “orange/born” rust like color to it. One ceiling tile had black/gray colored spots on the ceiling tile. A floor base board was lifting up exposing a rust like appearance. Plastic pallets in the water room had a dust like appearance on the plastic pallets and between the plastic pallet slats. . Interview with the Facility Administrator (FA) at the time of the observation stated, “We have put in many tickets to get this fixed.” 11:30AM walking through the facility supply room revealed the plastic ceiling light covers had what appeared to be “insect silhouettes”. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation revealed the FA also noticed the appearance of insects through the clear light cover. 11:40AM during the tour of the facility clinic floor revealed all the Computer on Wheels (COW) through out the clinic floor had whitish dust particle appearance on the keyboard. 11:45AM surveyor had FA open chair #10 chair #17, and, chair #24. The open chairs had a dusty and rust like appearance through out the chair frame. Chair #10 had a dust like appearance and a candy bar wrapper on the frame. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation revealed she saw the observation. 11:52AM surveyor opened wall boxes at station 19- 24, which revealed syringe caps underneath the wall boxes on the floor; within the wall boxes were dust like particles, cob webs and bugs. 12:00PM Blood pressure cuffs at Pod 5, Pod 6, Pod 9, Pod 15, and Pod 17 revealed what appeared to be a white fabric like debris stuck to the Velcro of the blood pressure cuff which was ready for patient use. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation confirmed the findings. 12:15PM during the tour of the Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) floor revealed the following: 12:18PM Surveyors had the FA open the PD chair which revealed the metal frame of the chair to be covered in a dust like substance. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation confirmed the findings. 12:28PM observation the facility PD Supply closet revealed the floor had a dust like appearance, clean supplies were stored over the dirty sink, a pair of scissors with a orange/brown rust like appearance was mixed in the drawer of patient supplies. 12:35PM Observation of the PD refrigerator revealed the refrigerator was unlocked; 41 boxes of medication, Mircera, was kept inside the unlocked refrigerator. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation confirmed the findings. 12:40PM Surveyors noticed a long crack, about 3 feet in length over the PD/Home Training room door frame. Interview with the FA at the time of the observation revealed they were aware of the crack and had put in many tickets to get that crack repaired. Interview with S#2 at the time of the observation revealed that they have been trying to get these things repaired and now that the facility is being surveyed it will become a priority to the leadership that approves work orders. 12:42PM observation inside the PD/Home Training room, surveyor saw a supply cart with multiple rust like areas on the stainless steel shelves. Record review of the facility policy titled Physical Environment states in part....The dialysis facility will be....maintained to provide dialysis patients, teammates and the public a safe, functional and comfortable treatment environment. 45179”
-
Immunization/Medication History
The inspectors’ words, 378 words
“PA-IMMUNIZATION/MEDICATION HISTORY CFR(s): 494.80(a)(3) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Immunization history, and medication history. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45179 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the patient’s history and physical; comprehensive assessment “medication history” included a review of the patients allergies. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure patient allergies were accurately documented for 10 out of 10 patient medical records reviewed. (P#1, P#2, P#3, P#4, P#5, P#6, P#7, P#8, P#9, and P#10). The findings were: Review of the History and Physicals for P#1, P#2, P#3, P#4, P#6, P#7, P#8, P#9 and P#10 revealed allergies were not identified in their History and Physicals in the medical record. Interview on 8/13/2025 at 2:45PM with the FA at the time of the observation revealed that the electronic health record was missing accurate allergy information. No explanation was given. Medical Record for P#5: Record review of the Annual Plan of Care for #5 revealed P#5 had an allergy to Vancomyocin. Record review of P#5 medical record revealed on the physical medical record binder, P#5 had “no known allergies”s on the label spine of the binder. Record review of the patients prescription order did not identify allergies. Record review of P#5’s History and Physical did not identify allergies. Review of policy Medical Records Documentation Guidance 03-03-03 rev. Apr. 2025 states in part, Definition 1. The medical record refers to any document or electronic system used to record information regarding the patient’s diagnosis, treatment and care, including but not limited to: ...History and Physical...Documentation Guidance....8. Document accurately and concisely but completely. Review of the facility policy, History and Physical (H&P) Policy 03-02-28 rev. Oct. 2021 states in part, Recommended Elements of a History and Physical (H&P) 1. Patient Name, MPI#, Date of Birth....5. Current medications with dosage including over the counter medications and vitamins... 10. Allergies Interview on 8/13/25 at 3:26PM with the facility Facility Staff #2 (FS#2) revealed the program to identify allergies in the History and Physical is not embedded in the program. Physician’s do not have a drop down box to identify patient allergies but need to add that manually. This oversight can be taken up with the support team at CWOW to adjust.”
-
Medical Records - Complete, Accurate, Accessible
The inspectors’ words, 307 words
“MR-COMPLETE, ACCURATE, ACCESSIBLE CFR(s): 494.170 The dialysis facility must maintain complete, accurate, and accessible records on all patients, including home patients who elect to receive dialysis supplies and equipment from a supplier that is not a provider of ESRD services and all other home dialysis patients whose care is under the supervision of the facility. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26870 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, and accessible records on all patients. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure patient allergies were documented for 10 out of 10 patient medical records reviewed, (P#1, P#2, P#3, P#4, P#5, P#6, P#7, P#8, P#9, and P#10). The findings were: Record review of patient History and Physicals for P#1, P#2, P#3, P#4, P#6, P#7, P#8, P#9 and P#10 revealed allergies were not identified in their History and Physicals in the medical record. Medical Record for P#5: Record review of the Annual Plan of Care for #5 revealed P#5 had an allergy to Vancomyocin. Record review of the Initial Nursing Assessment for P#5 identified P#5 to have an allergy to Vancomyocin. Record review of P#5 medical record revealed on the physical medical record binder, P#5 had “no known allergies” label on the spine of the binder. Record review of P#5’s History and Physical did not identify allergies. Review of the facility policy, History and Physical (H&P) Policy 03-02-28 rev. Oct. 2021 states in part, Recommended Elements of a History and Physical (H&P) 1. Patient Name, MPI#, Date of Birth....5. Current medications with dosage including over the counter medications and vitamins...10. Allergies Interview on 8/13/25 at 3:26PM with the facility Facility Staff #2 (FS#2) revealed the program to identify allergies in the History and Physical is not embedded in the program. Physician’s do not have a drop down box to identify patient allergies.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2025 | Standard inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 3, 1986.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, better than expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 57 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Bexar County, 54 have a star rating from CMS: 10 rated 5 of 5, 23 rated 4 of 5, 19 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.