Davita Sorensen Park Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Omaha, Nebraska 68134
6212 N 73rd Plaza #100, Omaha, Nebraska 68134. (402) 571-4147.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 1of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 17, 2025: a complaint inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jun 17, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Compliance With Fed/State/Local Laws
The inspectors’ words, 366 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH FED/STATE/LOCAL LAWS CFR(s): 494.20 The facility and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations pertaining to licensure and any other relevant health and safety requirements. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, staff schedules, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing for continuity of operations to ensure patient needs were met for 5 of 24 patients (Pt-1, Pt-2, Pt-3, Pt-4, and Pt-5) who failed to receive In Center Hemodialysis (ICHD) treatments at the facility as scheduled on 5-9-25 and the facility failed to have policies and procedures to ensure compliance with this requirement at Title 175 Nebraska Administrative Code (NAC) Chapter 7-006.03. The patient census was 37. This failed practice had the potential to negatively impact the health and safety of all patients who have physician orders to receive ICHD treatments at this facility. Findings are: A. Nebraska Title 175 NAC 7-006.03 Staff Requirements: Each health clinic must maintain a sufficient number of staff with the qualifications, training, and skills to meet operational and patient needs. B. Review of the facility staff schedule for 5/9/25 revealed the sole scheduled Registered Nurse (RN-C) was unable to work their scheduled shift resulting in a facility closure on 5/9/25. C. Review of the facility patient treatment records for 5/9/25 revealed that 5 of 24 patients (Pt-1, Pt-2, Pt-3, Pt-4, and Pt-5) declined receiving ICHD treatment at another facility or dialyzing at the facility as an alternative ICHD treatment day on 5/10/25. D. During staff interview on 6/16/25 at 12:37 PM, the Facility Administrator (FA) confirmed that RN-C was the sole scheduled RN for 5/9/25. The FA confirmed that they were unable to find a replacement RN for RN-C resulting in the facility closure on 5/9/25. The FA revealed it is the facility practice to assign one sole RN to work the entire day that patients are receiving ICHD treatments. The FA confirmed a policy and procedure did not exist for scheduling an RN as a back-up or on call RN in the event the sole scheduled RN is unable to work.”
-
Adm Resp For Fiscal Operations
The inspectors’ words, 369 words
“GOV-ADM RESP FOR FISCAL OPERATIONS CFR(s): 494.180(a)(2) The governing body or designated person responsible must appoint an individual who serves as the dialysis facility’s chief executive officer or administrator who exercises responsibility for the management of the facility and the provision of all dialysis services, including, but not limited to- (2) Fiscal operations; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, staff schedules, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have policies and procedures for maintaining the fiscal operations for the hiring of sufficient staff to maintain operations of the dialysis facility. This failed practice had the potential to negatively impact the health and safety of all patients who have physician orders to receive In Center Hemodialysis (ICHD) treatments at this facility. The patient census was 37. Findings are: A. Review of the facility staff schedule for 5/9/25 revealed the sole scheduled Registered Nurse (RN-C) was unable to work their scheduled shift resulting in a facility closure on 5/9/25. B. Review of the facility patient treatment records for 5/9/25 revealed that 5 of 24 patients (Pt-1, Pt-2, Pt-3, Pt-4, and Pt-5) declined receiving ICHD treatment at another facility or dialyzing at the facility as an alternative ICHD treatment day on 5/10/25. C. During staff interview on 6/16/25 at 12:37 PM, the Facility Administrator (FA) confirmed that RN-C was the sole scheduled RN for 5/9/25. The FA confirmed two nurses are assigned to this facility, RN-C and RN-D. The FA revealed RN-D was on vacation on 5/9/25 and would not have been available to come in and work in the event that RN-C was unable to work as scheduled. The FA revealed it is the facility practice to assign one RN to work the entire day that patients are receiving ICHD treatments. The FA confirmed policies and procedures did not exist for scheduling an RN as a back-up or on call RN in the event the sole scheduled RN is unable to work. D. During staff interview on 6/17/25 at 10:00 AM, the FA confirmed policies and procedures did not exist for maintaining the fiscal operations for the hiring of sufficient staff to maintain operations of the dialysis facility.”
Mar 6, 2025: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Medical Records
“CFC-MEDICAL RECORDS CFR(s): 494.170 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure the file cabinets where historical patient records were stored. This failed practice had the potential to affect the privacy and confidentiality of dialysis patients by not safeguarding patient medical records against unauthorized use. The patient census was 29.”
-
Dialysis Emergency Equipment
The inspectors’ words, 353 words
“Dialysis Emergency Equipment CFR(s): §494.62(b)(9) Condition for Coverage: [(b) Policies and procedures. The dialysis facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (9) A process by which the staff can confirm that emergency equipment, including, but not limited to, oxygen, airways, suction, defibrillator or automated external defibrillator, artificial resuscitator, and emergency drugs, are on the premises at all times and immediately available. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the Registered Nurses (RN-A and RN-B) failed to identify and remove expired emergency lab tubes from the Emergency Cart (where emergency medications and supplies are stored). This failed practice had the potential to affect lab results of all 29 patients on census if emergency labs were ordered by the physician. Findings are: A. Review of the policy titled Emergency Equipment Checks, dated 10/2024, revealed the expiration dates of emergency supplies are to be checked weekly by the facility nurses. B. Review of the procedure titled Emergency Equipment Checklist, 2/2025, revealed the weekly Emergency Cart review was completed and contained no expired supplies by nurses for the following weeks: 1. RN-A completed weekly checks of the Emergency Cart on: 2/1/25, 2/5/25, and 2/8/25. 2. RN-B completed weekly checks of the Emergency Cart on: 2/3/25, 2/10/25, 2/17/25, and 2/24/25. C. Observation of the facility Emergency Cart, on 2/27/25 at 9:30 AM with the Facility Administrator (FA), revealed 3 red clear lab tubes with an expiration date of 1/31/2025. D. During staff interview on 2/27/25 at 9:40 AM, the FA confirmed the 3 red lab tubes were expired and confirmed RN-A and RN-B failed to identify and remove the 3 expired red lab tubes during the weekly checks of the Emergency Cart for expired supplies.”
-
Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu
The inspectors’ words, 330 words
“PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the outer metal panel covering of the reverse osmosis (RO) machine (the primary method for purifying water for hemodialysis (HD) treatments) to prevent corrosion of the RO outer metal covering. This failed practice had the potential to affect the facility’s ability to provide uninterrupted HD treatments to all 29 patients on census. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Physical Environment, dated 4/2018, revealed the facility will be maintained for a safe and functional environment. B. Observation of the facility Water Room on 2/26/25 at 9:20 AM with the Facility Administrator (FA), revealed rust colored debris and corrosion of the back lower left outer metal panel of the RO machine. C. During staff interview on 2/27/25 at 12:40 PM, the Biomed Technician (BMT) confirmed the presence of rust colored debris and corrosion of the back lower left outer metal panel of the RO machine and confirmed this metal panel was in need of repair or replacement. The BMT confirmed the biomed staff are responsible for maintaining the RO machine. The BMT confirmed the biomed staff failed to maintain the outer metal panel of the RO machine. D. During staff interview on 2/27/25 at 1:00 PM, the FA confirmed the presence of rust colored debris and corrosion of the RO’s back lower left outer metal panel and confirmed this outer metal panel was in need of repair or replacement. The FA confirmed the biomed staff are responsible for maintaining the RO machine. The FA confirmed the biomed staff failed to maintain the outer metal panel covering of the RO machine.”
-
Mr - Protect Patient Records From Loss/Keep Confidential
The inspectors’ words, 299 words
“MR-PROTECT PT RECORDS FM LOSS/CONFIDENTIAL CFR(s): 494.170(a) The dialysis facility must- (1)Safeguard patient records against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use; and (2) Keep confidential all information contained in the patient’s record, except when release is authorized pursuant to one of the following: (i) The transfer of the patient to another facility. (ii) Certain exceptions provided for in the law. (iii) Provisions allowed under third party payment contracts. (iv) Approval by the patient. (v) Inspection by authorized agents of the Secretary, as required for the administration of the dialysis program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47269 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure the file cabinets where historical patient records were stored. This failed practice had the potential to affect the privacy and confidentiality of dialysis patients by not safeguarding patient medical records against unauthorized use. The patient census was 29. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medical Records Custodian (MRC) and Maintenance, dated 10/2019, revealed the MRC is responsible for safeguarding the privacy and confidentiality of patient medical records against unauthorized use. B. During observation of the open, unattended Medical Records room on 2/26/25 at 9:00 AM with the Facility Administrator (FA), 4 unlocked file cabinets containing patient medical records were identified. C. During staff interview on 2/26/25 at 10:00 AM, the Facility Administrator (FA) confirmed it is the expectation of the MRC to safeguard the privacy and confidentiality of patient medical records against unauthorized use. The FA further confirmed it is the expectation that patient medical records are stored in the Medical Records room and locked in the file cabinets designated for patient records. The FA confirmed the MRC failed to lock the 4 file cabinets containing patient medical records.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 4, 2000.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, worse than expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 13 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Douglas County, 11 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 4 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.