Children’s Nebraska
A dialysis facility in Omaha, Nebraska 68114
111 N 84th St, Omaha, Nebraska 68114. (402) 955-6155.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- Not rated CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 9, 2024: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 9, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Compliance With Fed/State/Local Laws
The inspectors’ words, 483 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH FED/STATE/LOCAL LAWS CFR(s): 494.20 The facility and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations pertaining to licensure and any other relevant health and safety requirements. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48995 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff (RN-O and RN-L) followed the five rights of medication administration, which means getting the right drug to the right recipient, in the right dosage, by the right route, at the right time, to prevent a medication error as defined under Nebraska Title 175 NAC 9-002, when preparing and administering medication to a facility patient (Patient 3). This failed practice had the potential to affect the health and safety of all patients who receive medications administered by the hemodialysis (HD) staff. In-center HD patient census was 3. Findings are: A. Nebraska Title 175 NAC 9-002.05 MEDICATION ERROR. Any variance between the chart order or prescription, the five rights, and administration of the medication. B. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated 5/2024, revealed medications will be administered using safe administration practices such as the “six rights” of medication administration. Six rights of drug administration for accuracy included right drug, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, and right documentation. If the medication is prepared at the unit level, a non-bar-coded medication label (including drug name, dose/strength, preparation date and initials of who prepared the medication) will be applied if the medication will be given by another professional or given over a period of time. This facility policy failed to ensure the staff member who prepares the medication is the same staff member who administers the medication to the patient. C. During initiation of Patient (PT)-3’s HD treatment on 5/6/24, the following was observed: 1. At 12:50 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)-O delivered a syringe, containing a clear liquid, to PT-3’s chairside table. The syringe was labeled Heparin (a medication which decreases the clotting ability of the blood) 1000 Units/mL (millimeter). 2. At 12:55 PM, RN-L and RN-O co-checked (the process of having a second healthcare professional independently check the preparation of a medication for administration) the Heparin syringe. RN-L administered the syringe, containing a clear liquid, labeled Heparin 1000 Units/mL into PT-3’s venous access device. D. During staff interview on 5/6/24 at 1:05 PM, RN-L confirmed administering the syringe labeled Heparin 1000 Units/mL to PT-3, but had not prepared the syringe. RN-L further confirmed the syringe had been prepared by RN-O (facility Resource Nurse), as the facility Resource Nurse is tasked with preparing the Heparin medications for the patient treatments, which is then administered by the staff initiating treatment. E. During staff interview on 5/9/24 at 9:30 AM, the Clinical Supervisor confirmed RN-L had followed facility policy, but failed to follow the five rights of medication administration.”
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 287 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48995 Based on review of facility policies and procedures, observations, and staff interview, 3 of 5 staff members (Staff RN-T, RN-O, and PCT-E) failed to follow facility policy and procedure to wear gloves while accessing the hemodialysis (HD) machines. This failed practice provided the opportunity for transmission of infectious diseases among both patients receiving HD treatment during the survey observation. In-center HD patient census was 3. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control in the Pediatric Dialysis Unit, with the date of 7/2023, revealed gloves will be worn by staff during any potential exposure to blood, dialysate, or any other potentially infectious substance which includes touching any part of the dialysis machine, tubing, blood lines, or dialyzer during or after a treatment. B. Observation of the provision of patient care revealed: 1. On 5/6/24 at 4:30 PM, RN-T touched the screen on an HD machine without wearing gloves. 2. On 5/6/24 at 5:00 PM, RN-O touched the screen on an HD machine with a glove wrapped around [gender] index finger. RN-O failed to wear gloves when [gender] touched the screen on an HD machine. 3. On 5/8/24 at 11:45 AM and 11:52 AM, PCT-E touched the screen on an HD machine without wearing gloves. C. During staff interview on 5/9/24 at 9:30 AM, the Clinical Supervisor confirmed RN-T, RN-O, and PCT-E did not follow facility policy and procedure for glove use while accessing the dialysis machines throughout the patient treatment area.”
-
Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments
The inspectors’ words, 373 words
“PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48995 Based on observations and staff interviews, staff members failed to ensure 2 of 3 patient’s (Patients 2 and 3) vascular access sites and blood lines remained visible throughout the patient’s hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Additionally, the facility failed to have policies and procedures for the visualization of patient’s vascular access sites and blood lines during HD treatment. This failed practice provided the opportunity for accidental dislodgement, or line disconnection, to go undetected which could result in exsanguination (the process of losing blood) and patient death within minutes. In-center HD patient census was 3. Findings are: A. Observation of HD treatments, on 5/6/24 from 1:45 PM to 5:00 PM, revealed staff members O, L, F and E failed to address and correct staff’s obstructed view of Patient 2’s vascular access site and blood lines, which were covered by Patient 2’s shirt and blanket. B. Observation of HD treatments, on 5/6/24 from 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM, revealed staff members J, E and O failed to address and correct staff’s obstructed view of Patient 3’s vascular access site and blood lines, which were covered by a blanket. C. Observation of HD treatments, on 5/8/24 from 11:45 AM to 12:15 PM, revealed staff members S, E and G failed to address and correct staff’s obstructed view of Patient 2’s vascular access site and blood lines, which were covered by Patient 2’s shirt and blanket. D. During staff interview on 5/9/24 at 9:30 AM, the Clinical Supervisor: 1. confirmed a facility policy and procedure for the visibility of the patient’s vascular access site and blood line connections, by staff, during the patient’s HD treatment did not exist on 5/8/24, when the policy was requested by the surveyor; and 2. provided a copy of the facility policy titled Hemodialysis Nursing Management, dated 5/2024, with a new requirement that vascular access site, bloodline connections, and face must be visible throughout the treatment. The Clinical Supervisor confirmed this new requirement was added to this policy on 5/8/24, after the surveyor requested the policy.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
| May 7, 2024 | Standard inspection | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jun 3, 2019.
- Run as a non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 3 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Not enough quality measure data to calculate a star rating.”
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 13 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Douglas County, 11 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 4 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS gives this facility no star rating to compare.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.