Davita Air Capital Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Wichita, Kansas 67213
1812 S Seneca St Suite 110, Wichita, Kansas 67213. (316) 263-1248.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 1of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 17 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 17, 2024: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 17, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 400 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed their gloves and performed hand hygiene during central venous catheter (CVC) exit site care for 2 (Patient 7 and Patient 8) of 8 sampled patients. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for infection. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) with Clearguard HD [hemodialysis] Antimicrobial End Caps Procedure” with an origination date of April 2019, revealed “1. Perform hand hygiene per procedure.” Per the policy, “4. Remove old dressing and discard.” and “7. Remove gloves and discard. Perform hand hygiene per procedure and re-glove.” During an observation on 05/15/24 at 11:27 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 5 performed CVC exit site care. Once RN 5 removed the old dressing, she did not remove her gloves and perform hand hygiene, and proceeded to clean the area around the CVC exit site. During an interview on 05/15/24 at 3:05 PM, RN 5 stated that she did not perform hand hygiene and change her gloves after she removed the CVC dressing during care for Patient 7. During an observation on 05/16/24 at 10:21 AM, Patient Care Technician (PCT) 11 performed CVC exit site care for Patient 8. Once PCT 11 removed the old dressing, he did not remove his gloves and perform hand hygiene, and proceeded to clean the area around the CVC exit site. During an interview on 05/16/24 at 11:23 AM, PCT 11 stated that the expectation would be to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after the CVC dressing was removed. PCT 11 acknowledged that he did not remove his gloves and perform hand hygiene when he completed CVC exit site care for Patient 8. During an interview on 05/17/24 at 8:35 AM, the Facility Administrator stated that he expected staff to perform hand hygiene and change their gloves after removal of the CVC dressing during CVC exit site care. During an interview on 05/17/24 at 8:52 AM, the Medical Director stated he expected staff to perform hand hygiene and change their gloves after removal of the CVC dressing during CVC exit site care.”
-
Ic - Items Taken To Station Disposed/Dedicated Or Disinfected
The inspectors’ words, 523 words
“IC-IF TO STATION=DISP/DEDICATE OR DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. -- Nondisposable items that cannot be cleaned and disinfected (e.g., adhesive tape, cloth covered blood pressure cuffs) should be dedicated for use only on a single patient. -- Unused medications (including multiple dose vials containing diluents) or supplies (syringes, alcohol swabs, etc.) taken to the patient’s station should be used only for that patient and should not be returned to a common clean area or used on other patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to disinfect objects before removing them from the patient treatment station in 3 (patient treatment stations 1, 2, and 3) of 3 patient treatment stations observed. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for infections. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” last revised in October 2021, revealed, “...49. The outside surfaces of all equipment will be wiped with a bleach solution prior to removal from treatment area.” During an observation on 05/15/24 at 8:56 AM, Patient Care Technician (PCT) 9 discontinued the dialysis treatment that was performed in patient treatment station 2. At 9:33 AM, without disinfecting the sharps container, Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT) 8 removed the sharps container from the patient treatment station. During an observation on 05/15/24 at 9:35 AM, CCHT 8 discontinued the dialysis treatment that was performed in patient treatment station 3. At 9:49 AM, without disinfecting the sharps container, PCT 9 removed the sharps container from the patient treatment station. During an observation on 05/15/24 at 11:34 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 5 discontinued the dialysis treatment that was performed in patient treatment station 1. At 11:47 AM, without disinfecting the sharps container, RN 5 removed the sharps container from the patient treatment station. During an interview on 05/15/24 at 9:50 AM, PCT 9 stated the practice at the facility was to clean any visible residue off the sharp containers. Per PCT 9, she was unsure if the sharps containers should be cleaned when brought out of the patient treatment station. During an interview on 05/15/24 at 10:13 AM, CCHT 8 stated that the sharps containers were only cleaned when visibly soiled and at the end of the treatment day. During an interview on 05/15/24 at 10:27 AM, RN 4 stated that the sharps containers would be disinfected, along with the patient treatment station, at the completion of each patient treatment and at the end of the day. During an interview on 05/17/24 at 8:35 AM, the Facility Administrator stated that the sharps containers should be disinfected each time the container was taken out of the patient treatment station, per the facility policy. During an interview on 05/17/24 at 8:52 AM, the Medical Director stated that the sharps containers not being disinfected when taken out of the patient treatment station was outside of the facility expectations.”
-
Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety
The inspectors’ words, 237 words
“PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observations, interview, document review, and facility policy review, the End Stage Renal Dialysis (ESRD) facility failed to ensure the 6 of 6 oxygen tanks were properly stored. This deficient practice has the potential to place patient and staff at risk for harm. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, “Physical Environment,” last revised in April 2018, revealed, “10. The dialysis facility will store supplies in a manner that is consistent with fire safety and other appropriate regulations.” Review of an undated typed document from the “Office of the State Fire Marshal - Fire Prevention Division” document review, provided by the Facility Administrator, revealed “Freestanding cylinders shall be properly chained or in a cylinder stand or cart.” During observation on 05/14/24 at 10:00 AM and 11:22 AM, six oxygen tanks were unsecured and stored in the conference room. During an interview on 05/14/24 at 11:22 AM, the Facility Administrator stated that the oxygen tanks were “just delivered” and the facility’s process was to store oxygen tanks in another location. During an interview on 05/17/24 at 9:01 AM, the Medical Director stated that oxygen tanks should be stored in a manner to prevent them from falling over.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 3, 2018.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 17 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 11 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Sedgwick County, 10 have a star rating from CMS: 6 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.