Fresenius Medical Care- Wichita East
A dialysis facility in Wichita, Kansas 67206
9341 E 21st N, Wichita, Kansas 67206. (316) 634-6760.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Dec 17, 2024: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Dec 17, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Ep Training And Testing
The inspectors’ words, 696 words
“EP Training and Testing CFR(s): §403.748(d), §416.54(d), §418.113(d), §441.184(d), §460.84(d), §482.15(d), §483.73(d), §483.475(d), §484.102(d), §485.68(d), §485.542(d), §485.625(d), §485.727(d), §485.920(d), §486.360(d), §491.12(d), §494.62(d). *[For RNCHIs at §403.748, ASCs at §416.54, Hospice at §418.113, PRTFs at §441.184, PACE at §460.84, Hospitals at §482.15, HHAs at §484.102, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, CAHs at §486.625, “Organizations” under 485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, OPOs at §486.360, and RHC/FHQs at §491.12:] (d) Training and testing. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(d):] (d) Training and testing. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least annually. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d):] Training and testing. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. The ICF/IID must meet the requirements for evacuation drills and training at §483.470(i). *[For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(d):] Training, testing, and orientation. The dialysis facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training, testing and patient orientation program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training, testing and orientation program must be evaluated and updated at every 2 years. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43397 Based on document review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it had developed and maintained an emergency preparedness patient orientation program for 5 of 5 sampled patients (Patient 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). The patient orientation program must be reflective of the facility’s risk assessment to determine if it is reflective of the risks and hazards identified within the facility’s program. The failure of the facility to ensure it has a patient emergency preparedness orientation program has the potential to leave patients ill-prepared for emergent situations and could negatively impact the health and well-being of the 51 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. Findings Include: Review of a policy titled, “Guidelines for Emergency Preparedness,” dated 07/03/23, showed, “The facility must develop a communication plan for all patients ...This plan includes the following ...Provide each patient with hard copies of the following information: Name, address and phone number of the dialysis facility; Name and phone number of their nephrologist; Any organizational emergency contact information such as the Patient Emergency Number; Materials that include information regarding emergencies, such as; Emergency Kit Checklist; Emergency Food and Water Supply; Emergency Meal Plan; Care Transitions Report ...Facility staff must educate patients on: Evacuation procedures; Emergency Disconnection Procedures; Emergency Meal Plan; Facility Contact Information; Shelter Information; Transportation Information; Emergency Preparedness ...” Review of the medical record for Patient 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 failed to show documented evidence that patients received and attested to documentation on emergency preparedness materials and/or education for emergency preparedness and procedures. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 1:15 PM, Staff B, Director of Operations acknowledged that the facility failed to obtain documented attestation that patients had received the required Emergency Preparedness Orientation, materials, and/or education for emergency preparedness and procedures.”
-
Informed - Patient Care Policies
The inspectors’ words, 268 words
“PR-INFORMED OF PT CARE POLICIES CFR(s): 494.70(a)(8) The patient has the right to- (8) Be informed of facility policies regarding patient care, including, but not limited to, isolation of patients; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43397 Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 sampled patients (Patient 1,2,3,4 and 5) was informed of facility policy/procedure for discontinuation of dialysis and evacuation in case of emergency procedures. The failure of the facility to provide policy/procedures for disconnection and evacuation during an emergency has the potential to negatively impact the health and well-being of the 51 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. Findings Include: Review of a policy titled, “Guidelines for Emergency Preparedness,” dated 07/03/23, showed, “ ...Facility staff must educate patients on: Evacuation procedures; Emergency Disconnection Procedures; Emergency Meal Plan; Facility Contact Information; Shelter Information; Transportation Information; Emergency Preparedness ...” Review of the medical records for Patients 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 failed to show documented evidence that any patient was provided with information of the facility’s emergency preparedness policies or procedures that could be verified by patient signature of receipt and understanding. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide documentation signed by the patient acknowledging receipt of same. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 10:00 AM, Staff A, Clinical Manager acknowledged that the patients’ medical records failed to contain documented evidence that the facility provided patients with facility policy/procedure on evacuation procedures, emergency disconnection, emergency meal plan, facility contact information, shelter information, transportation information, and emergency preparedness as required per facility policy.”
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 465 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43397 Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the individualized dialysis prescription as prescribed by the medical provider for 2 of 5 sampled patients (Patient 1 and 3). Failure to follow the medical providers’ dialysis prescription had the potential to negatively impact the effectiveness of the prescribed dialysis treatments for the 51 in-center patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. Findings Include: Review of a policy titled, “Early Termination or Arriving Late for Treatment,” dated 11/07/22, showed, “Treatment duration and frequency is prescribed by a patient’s physician and the facility expects that all patients will adhere to their prescribed treatment time and schedule. Serious health related consequences may result from missed treatments or terminating treatments earlier than prescribed ...Patients requesting early termination of a treatment in an outpatient facility early will be referred to the supervising registered nurse (RN) ...The RN is responsible to notify the physician ...” Patient 1 Review of Patient 1’s medical record showed a prescribed treatment time of three hours and 30 minutes. Review of Patient 1’s treatment record on 11/16/24 showed the treatment was terminated one hour and 30 minutes early. Review of the medical record failed to show documented evidence that a physician was notified of the early termination of treatment. Review of Patient 1’s treatment record on 12/14/24 showed the treatment was terminated 34 minutes early. Review of the medical record failed to show documented evidence that a physician was notified of the early termination of treatment. Patient 3 Review of Patient 3’s medical record showed a prescribed treatment time of three hours and 45 minutes. Review of Patient 3’s treatment record on 12/10/24 showed the treatment was terminated 37 minutes early. Review of the medical record failed to show documented evidence that a physician was notified of the early termination of treatment. Review of Patient 3’s treatment record on 12/12/24 showed the treatment was terminated two hours and 45 minutes early. Review of the medical record failed to show documented evidence that a physician was notified of the early termination of treatment. Review of Patient 3’s treatment record on 12/14/24 showed the treatment was terminated one hour and 30 minutes early. Review of the medical record failed to show documented evidence that a physician was notified of the early termination of treatment. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 12:20 PM, Staff A, Clinical Manager acknowledged shortened treatments on Patient 1 and Patient 3. She acknowledged that documentation failed to show evidence that an RN notified a physician of the early termination of treatments.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 27, 2004.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 11 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Sedgwick County, 10 have a star rating from CMS: 6 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.