Hearth Record

Fresenius Medical Care Stone Mountain

A dialysis facility in Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083

5723 Memorial Dr, Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083. (678) 836-0251.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 14, 2025: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 14, 2025: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Governance

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “CFC-GOVERNANCE CFR(s): 494.180 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation, staff interviews and facility record review, it was determined that the Governing Body failed to demonstrate responsibility and accountability for the operations of the facility. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 54 hemodialysis patients who were under the care of this facility. Findings include: Cross-Reference: V757 - Failure of the Facility Administrator to ensure that the facility had adequate number of qualified staff to meet the needs of all patients and provide safe patient care; and to be in compliance with the minimum State required staffing ratios of one licensed and qualified nurse for every 12 patients who were receiving dialysis care and one qualified patient care giver for every four patients.”

    Rule V0750. Condition-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 370 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation, staff interview and a review of facility policy, it was determined that the Governing Body failed to ensure that the Infection Control Committee implemented facility policy as evidenced by failure of one of one Patient Care Technician (PCT AA) observed, to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when appropriate, to prevent exposure to blood, body fluids and other potentially contaminated substances. This deficient practice increased the risk for cross contamination and spread of infection to PCT AA and the dialysis unit. The facility census was 54. Findings include: - During observation in the Patient Treatment Room at 10:13 a.m. on 2/12/2025, the following was observed: - PCT AA terminated the dialysis treatment on a patient (P) (P#7), with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), at Station (S), S14. PCT AA was not wearing goggles or a face shield when he removed P#7’s fistula needles from P#7’s access site, which had the potential for blood spurting after fistula needle removal. - During an interview with PCT AA (immediately after removing P#7’s fistula needles), this surveyor asked PCT AA if he was aware that he was not wearing goggles or a face shield when he performed this task. PCT AA responded, “I forgot”. -A review of Facility Policy, titled, “Personal Protective Equipment”, Published 11/06/23, Version 6, stated: Policy: Employees shall use personal protective equipment in accordance with the type of patient contact expected and anticipated exposure. Eyewear: Protective eyewear is provided by the facility and must be eye protection designed under normal conditions of use to prevent blood and OPIM (other potential infectious material) from reaching the eyes. - During the exit interview on 2/14/25 at 4:45 p.m., the Interim Charge Nurse II, Facility Administrator and Director of Operations, were informed of the above observation.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level.

  • Nurse Manager - 12 Mo Rn + 6 Mo Dialysis

    The inspectors’ words, 518 words

    “PQ-NURSE MANAGER-12 MO RN+6 MO DIALYSIS CFR(s): 494.140(b)(1) (1) Nurse manager. The facility must have a nurse manager responsible for nursing services in the facility who must- (i) Be a full time employee of the facility; (ii) Be a registered nurse; and (iii) Have at least 12 months of experience in clinical nursing, and an additional 6 months of experience in providing nursing care to patients on maintenance dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on a review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that this facility had a full-time Registered Nurse (RN), who was responsible for nursing services, to provide oversight and direction to twelve of twelve Direct Patient Care Staff (one full-time Registered Nurse (RN CC), three part-time RNs - RN AA, RN BB, RN EE, six full-time Patient Care Technicians (PCTs) - PCT AA, PCT BB, PCT CC, PCT DD, PCT EE, and PCT GG) and one part-time PCT FF), who provided nursing care and dialysis care to 54 in-center hemodialysis patients who were under the care of this facility. Findings include: - A review of the facility’s Governing Body Meeting minutes dated 1/16/25 showed that RN DD, who was employed as full-time Clinical Manager (CM) at a sister facility, was adapted by the Governing Body as Interim Charge Nurse II, at this facility. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 10:15 a.m., the Facility Administrator (FA) stated that the facility was open six days per week with two scheduled groups, namely: Mondays-Wednesdays-Fridays (MWF) and Tuesdays-Thursdays-Saturdays (TTS), and with two shifts for both MWF and TTS groups. The FA also added that the facility have had one full-time Registered Nurse (RN CC), who was usually scheduled on MWF, since the last Charge Nurse (CN) went out on leave and had not returned. The FA also explained that she used their float pool and part-time nurses most of the time since 12/2022, on the TTS schedule. During an interview with the Director of Operations (DO) on 2/13/25 at 10:45 a.m., he stated that he provided daily RN coverage to manage the treatment floor with multiple float RNs from sister facilities. The DO was shown the federal regulation requirements for the “Nurse in Charge of Nursing Services” and the requirements for the role of CN. After reviewing the requirements, the DO acknowledged the difference in the roles and requirements. - RN DD had no personnel file at this facility and she stated on 2/14/25 at 2:00 p.m., that she signed her job description as Interim Charge Nurse II, in charge of Nursing Services at this facility, during this survey. In addition, RN DD stated that she worked full time at another sister facility as the Facility Administrator/Clinical Manager and came to this facility maybe once a week to review labs with the Medical Director, assist occasionally with inputting doctor’s orders, and attended some QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meetings. - During the exit interview on 2/14/25 at 4:45 p.m., the Interim Charge Nurse II, Facility Administrator and Director of Operations, acknowledged the above findings.”

    Rule V0684. Standard-level.

  • Staff # & Ratio Meet Patient Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 1,114 words

    “GOV-STAFF # & RATIO MEET PT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.180(b)(1) The governing body or designated person responsible must ensure that- (1) An adequate number of qualified personnel are present whenever patients are undergoing dialysis so that the patient/staff ratio is appropriate to the level of dialysis care given and meets the needs of patients; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on staff interviews, observation, and a review of records, it was determined that the Facility Administrator failed to ensure the facility had adequate number of qualified staff to meet the needs of all patients as evidenced by a lack of at least one licensed and qualified nurse (who was not counted as a dialysis care giver in the staff-to-patient ratio of one dialysis care giver to four patients), who was readily available to provide nursing care, take charge, and deal with unexpected complications of dialysis, for every 12 patients who were receiving dialysis care; and that each care giver was not assigned more than four patients each shift. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay in monitoring patients for issues such as fluid overload (an excessive amount of fluid in the body), changes in vital signs, access sites, or problems with the dialysis equipment. Additionally, insufficient staffing could mean slower responses to alarms, missed complications including but not limited to intradialytic hypotension (sudden drops in blood pressure which can occur when fluid is removed too rapidly), arrhythmias (irregular heartbeat), and other medical issues and emergencies related to hemodialysis. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 54 patients who dialyzed at this facility. Findings include: - During an interview on 2/12/25 at 10:15 a.m., the Facility Administrator (FA) stated that the facility was open six days per week with two scheduled groups, namely: Mondays-Wednesdays-Fridays (MWF) and Tuesdays-Thursdays-Saturdays (TTS), and with two shifts for both MWF and TTS groups. The FA also added that the facility have had one full-time Registered Nurse (RN CC), since the last Charge Nurse (CN) went out on leave and had not returned. The FA also explained that she used their float pool and part-time nurses most of the time since 12/2022. - During an interview on 2/13/25 at 10:06 a.m., the Medical Director stated that she was aware of and had been concerned about staffing for several months, and had discussed about this staffing concern with the Director of Operations and Leadership. - During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 2/13/25 between 11:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., the following was revealed: - There were two Registered Nurses (RN AA and RN BB), and two Patient Care Technicians (PCT AA and PCT BB), providing care for 11 patients on the first shift and seven patients on the second shift. PCT AA had just recently completed her training. - During an interview on 2/13/25 at 11:10 a.m., RN AA stated, “It’s usually just one RN, and two PCTs scheduled on TTS for 11 patients on the first shift and seven patients on second shift. Two of the patients (P), (P#1 and P#6), on first shift had Central Venous Catheters (CVC - a soft plastic tube that’s inserted into a large vein close to the heart and used as an access to provide hemodialysis). RN AA added that he was assigned as direct care giver to these two patients and oversee the care of the remaining patients. RN AA also explained that he just worked part time at this facility and it can get a little hectic at times. RN AA further explained that his responsibilities as a direct care giver to the two patients (P#1 and P#6), included machine set up, initiation and termination of treatment, breaking down the machine post treatment, removal of the bloodlines, cleaning/disinfecting the machine and patients’ hemodialysis chairs, in addition to the primary responsibilities of nurses, such as: pre and post nursing assessments, preparation and administration of medications, monitoring and providing intervention if any issues arose with patients during dialysis, provide chairside education, review laboratory (lab) reports and report lab results to the doctor, schedule vascular appointments, order medication refills, supervise and assist the PCTs, etcetera (etc.). - A review of the facility’s TTS Staff/Patient schedule from February 4, 2025 - February 8, 2025, revealed the following: 2/4/25 (Tuesday): One RN and two PCTs scheduled; 11 patients dialyzed on first shift. 2/6/25 (Thursday): One RN and two PCTs scheduled; 10 patients dialyzed on first shift. 2/8/25(Saturday): One RN and Two PCTs scheduled; 10 patients dialyzed on first shift. A review of the “Patient Treatment Flowsheets” dated 2/4/25, 2/6/25, and 2/8/25, revealed the following: On 2/4/25: - RN AA was assigned as direct care giver to P#6 and P#7 (who had CVCs) at Stations (S) (S1 and S14), in addition to his duties as a charge nurse to all 11 patients on first shift. PCT BB was assigned to four patients (P#8, P#9, P#10 and P#11), at S15, S16, S17 and S18. PCT DD was assigned to five patients (P#12, P#13, P#14, P#15, and P#16), at S19, S20, S2, S11 and S13. On 2/6/25: - RN AA was assigned as direct care giver to P#6 and P#7, in addition to his duties as a charge nurse to all 10 patients on first shift. PCT CC was assigned to three patients (P#8, P#9, P#11), at S15, S16, and S18 (since S17 was vacant). PCT AA was assigned to five patients (P#12, P#13, P#14, P#15, and P#16), at S19, S20, S2, S11, and S13. PCT AA was assisted by PCT CC. On 2/8/25: - RN BB was assigned as direct care giver to P#6 and P#7, in addition to her duties as a charge nurse to all 10 patients on first shift. PCT CC was assigned to three patients (P#8, P#9, P#11), at S15, S16, and S18 (since S17 was vacant). PCT DD was assigned to (P#12, P#13, P#14, P#15, and P#16), at S19, S20, S2 and S11, and S13. PCT DD was assisted by PCT CC. - During an interview on 2/13/25 at 3:12 p.m., PCT BB stated, “We try to use two or three Pods (sections), with four patient stations each, to keep the patients close together and make it easier to monitor on TTS. PCTs usually monitor five patients each, especially if the nurse got busy”. - Both RN AA and PCT BB confirmed that the staffing observed on 2/13/25 was not the usual staffing. The usual schedule was only one RN and two PCTs consistently on TTS. - During the exit interview on 2/14/25 at 4:45 p.m., the Interim Charge Nurse II, Facility Administrator and Director of Operations, acknowledged the above findings.”

    Rule V0757. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 14, 2025Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 7, 2001.
  • Run for profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 20 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Dekalb County, 24 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 11 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.