Fmc of Dekalb Gwinnett Inc.
A dialysis facility in Decatur, Georgia 30030
497 Winn Way Suite 160, Decatur, Georgia 30030. (404) 294-7070.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 20 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 25, 2025: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jun 25, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Governance
The inspectors’ words, 104 words
“CFC-GOVERNANCE CFR(s): 494.180 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 50523 Based on facility record review, patient and staff interviews and a review of facility Policy and Procedures (P&P), it was determined that the Governing Body failed to demonstrate responsibility and accountability for the operations of the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 54 in-center hemodialysis patients who received hemodialysis services at this facility. Findings include: Cross-Reference: V 452 - Failure of the facility to ensure there was a culture of safety for patients and to ensure patients were treated with respect and dignity.”
-
Respect & Dignity
The inspectors’ words, 1,389 words
“PR-RESPECT & DIGNITY CFR(s): 494.70(a)(1) The patient has the right to- (1) Respect, dignity, and recognition of his or her individuality and personal needs, and sensitivity to his or her psychological needs and ability to cope with ESRD This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50523 Based on observation, a review of facility records, patients and staff interviews, and a review of the facility’s Policies and Procedures (P&P), it was determined that the Clinical Manager (who was the Facility Administrator), failed to ensure all patients were treated with respect and dignity and were provided support and resolution regarding patients’ voiced concerns, grievances and complaints. Failure of direct patient care staff (nurses and patient care technicians-PCTs), to follow facility Policy regarding patients’ voiced concerns, complaints and grievances, staff behavior expectations of treating others with respect, dignity and ethical manner, deprived all patients of a culture of safety to be able to freely voice their concerns, complaints and grievances without fear of retaliation. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the emotional health and safety of all 54 patients who were dialyzing at the facility. Findings include: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 6/25/25 between 11:01 a.m. and 12:50 p.m., it was observed that all staff were respectful to all patients during initiation and termination of dialysis treatments (shift change from first to second shift). During patient (P) interviews on 6/25/25 between 11:15 a.m. and 11:47 a.m., the following was revealed: - P#5 stated at 11:15 a.m., that she did not feel comfortable sharing her concerns with the nurses and PCTs, because she had voiced her concerns/complaints in the past but she felt that they were never addressed. P#5 also added that she chose to simply come to her hemodialysis treatments and kept any concerns to herself. - P#6 stated at 11:47 a.m., that she was afraid to speak up because she felt that the facility was not interested in addressing her concerns regarding the way certain staff members treated her and other patients. During Staff (nurses, PCTs, Clinical Manager and Social Worker - SW) interviews on 6/25/25 between 11:29 a.m. and 2:20 p.m., the following was revealed: - Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN AA), stated at 11:29 a.m., that the patients frequently made verbal complaints to her regarding the care received at the facility. LPN AA stated that whenever the patients voiced their concerns to her, she consistently referred them to the SW or to the Clinic Manager so that they (SW and Clinical Manager), could file a grievance on behalf of the patients. - PCT BB stated at 11:41 a.m., that when patients shared their complaints to her regarding the nurses’ and PCTs’ delivery of care to patients, PCT BB stated that she directed the patients to file a complaint with the SW or the Clinical Manager, rather than filing a grievance for the patients herself. - PCT CC stated at 12:32 p.m., that patients’ grievances were not addressed appropriately. PCT CC reported that many patients had discussed their concerns with her regarding issues at the facility. PCT CC added that most patients did not report their grievances to the SW or the Clinical Manager, because they felt their concerns would not be taken seriously. PCT CC also stated that she had never submitted a patient’s grievance. - The Administrative Assistant (AA) stated at 1:02 p.m., that there were times when patients expressed their concerns and dissatisfaction to her regarding their care, and she advised them to report their complaints to the SW or the Clinical Manager. The AA also added that she didn’t have access to the patients’ Grievance Log. - The SW, during a telephonic interview at 1:32 p.m., stated that any staff member could file a verbal or written grievance on behalf of patients. The SW also added that if patients’ grievances were not documented, they could not be properly addressed or resolved. - Registered Nurse (RN AA) at 12:49 p.m., stated that she had not received any complaints from patients. - The Clinical Manager stated at 2:20 p.m., that there were times when patients made verbal complaints to her, and she addressed their concerns immediately; however, those complaints were not recorded in the Patients’ Grievance Report. The Clinic Manager also stated that if patients’ grievances that were reported to the staff, were not filed or documented, they were not addressed because she was not made aware of these patients’ grievances. - A review of the facility’s “Patient Grievance Report” from December 2024 through June 2025 showed four complaints related to patient care. - P #1, on 12/16/24, requested to speak with the facility’s SW regarding a nurse’s sarcastic response to his inquiry and did not directly respond to him about his questions regarding his hemodialysis treatment. On 2/12/25 (58 calendar days later), the SW stated in her Initial Service Recovery: ... P#1 shared with the SW that he was having a lot of anxiety “around his care/health and expects that if he has questions/concerns they will be answered respectfully and professionally”. (sic) P#1 also added that he had concerns about his iron (for the treatment of anemia) and was not addressed until three weeks later. - P#2 on 12/17/24, expressed concerns about his safety and felt dismissed once he attempted to express his concerns with the PCTs. The SW’s Initial Service Recovery was dated 1/24/25 (38 calendar days later). - P#3’s daughter expressed her concerns about P#3’s care on 2/17/25, by PCT AA. P#3’s daughter did not want PCT AA to provide care to her father (P#3), because PCT AA was very rough with P#3 on 2/14/25. Corrective action was taken, and a documented counseling was given to PCT AA on 3/20/25 (31 calendar days later), after another patient (P#4), voiced a complaint regarding PCT AA’s behavior on 3/18/25. - P#4 on 3/18/25, complained that PCT AA threw her gloves at him in the past and was very rude in tone towards him. P#4 reported feeling unsafe and worried this behavior would happen again intentionally. The SW’s “Initial Service Recovery” note, dated 4/3/25 (16 calendar days later), stated: SW met with the patient today after the patient expressed wanting to transfer from the clinic. The patient reports he feels as if he has been label as a “problem patient’ and it has impacted his treatment from the staff. The patient identified how in the past (PCT AA) has thrown gloves at him. Patient reported he inquired with her (PCT AA) about why she was so rude to him and he (P#4), reported she (PCT AA) replied “Because of how you are, everyone knows how you are”. The patient reports due to this response he feels unsafe about his treatment and worries if things will be done to him intentionally. (sic) - P#5 on 2/12/25, expressed concerns about PCT EE that when PCT EE was working the patients including himself, were forced to wait a long time for start of treatment and waiting a long time coming off when treatment was completed. The SW’s Initial Service Recovery, dated 2/17/25, stated: ... “Patient also shared there are times when he asks her questions and is ignored”. (sic) Although the Patient Grievance Report showed that the above patients’ complaints were resolved, there was no documented evidence of additional actions or staff audits to ensure the facility’s Policy regarding Patient Grievance and providing respect and dignity were implemented and followed by the staff, and there was no documented evidence that the facility ensured there was a culture of safety for patients established, for freedom of communication and to prevent fear of retaliation. A review of facility Policy: Version 4, titled, “Patient Grievance” with latest revision date of May 5, 2025, stated: A patient or designated representative may register a verbal or written complaint at any time directly or anonymously through the following channels, identified on the “Important Numbers” document: “ Any facility staff member, Clinical Manager, or Director of Operations It is expected that all staff members will attempt to address and resolve patient complaints immediately, within the timeframe of the patient/ representative encounter. A review of the facility’s Human Resources, “Behavior in the Workplace”, version 1 with an effective date of 12/15/2020, stated: Guidelines: Expectations for behavior in the workplace includes: * Treat others with dignity and respect * Act in an ethical manner...”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 1, 1977.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 20 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 25 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Dekalb County, 24 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 11 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.