Davita Jacksonville Arlington Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Jacksonville, Florida 32211
929 University Blvd N, Jacksonville, Florida 32211. (904) 743-1689.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 1of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Dec 15, 2025: a complaint inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Dec 15, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Pt/Caregiver Demonstrated Comprehension Of Training
The inspectors’ words, 1,027 words
“H-PT/CAREGIVER DEMO COMPREHEND TRAINING CFR(s): 494.100(b)(1) The dialysis facility must - (1) Document in the medical record that the patient, the caregiver, or both received and demonstrated adequate comprehension of the training; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42310 Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure documentation in the medical record indicated the patient, the care partner, or both received and demonstrated adequate comprehension of the Home Hemodialysis (HHD) training for 1 (Patient #1) of 3 patients sampled. Findings include: 1) Patient #1 was a 47-year-old female with a recent diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis. The patient was approved by the facility medical director to participate in the HHD program with a Care Partner (her mother). The training program required attendance, return demonstrations, testing, and a final evaluation at home, unassisted but observed by the facility HHD training nurse. Training consisted of approximately 14 treatments over five weeks, with facility forms requiring initials and/or signatures from the HHD training nurse, the patient, and the Care Partner. During the record review of Patient #1, it was discovered that documentation indicating completion by the patient and the Care Partner was incomplete. The following issues were identified: 1a) Home Hemodialysis (HHD) Epogen Self-Administration & IV Self-Administration Patient Education Tool/Agreement Form Education and agreement related to this topic required signatures from the HHD training nurse, the patient, and the Care Partner. This form did not have signatures from the patient or the Care Partner. 1b) HHD Epogen Subcutaneous & IV Self-Administration Skill Checklist There were 35 skills listed to be validated by both the patient and the Care Partner. Each skill required one demonstration by the HHD training nurse and two separate return demonstrations, each return demonstration by the patient and by the Care Partner. Documentation indicated that each skill, at the time of demonstration, required initials by the HHD training nurse. The form also included a section for the patient and the Care Partner to sign and date, indicating they had completed the education for that area. However, there were no initials by the HHD training nurse (each of the 35 skills × 3 = 105 opportunities missed), and the documentation was not signed by either the patient or the Care Partner. 1c) Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition (IPDN) Patient Education Tool/Agreement Form Education and agreement related to this topic required signatures from the HHD training nurse, the patient, and the Care Partner. This form did not have signatures from the patient or the Care Partner. 1d) Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition (IPDN) Skills Checklist There were 9 skills listed to be validated by both the patient and the Care Partner. Each skill required one demonstration by the HHD training nurse and two separate return demonstrations, each return demonstration by the patient and by the Care Partner. Documentation indicated that each skill, at the time of demonstration, required initials by the HHD training nurse. The form also included a section for the patient and the Care Partner to sign and date, indicating they had completed the education for that area. However, there were no initials by the HHD training nurse (each of the 9 skills × 3 = 27 opportunities missed), and the documentation was not signed by either the patient or the Care Partner. 1e) HHD IV Iron Self-Administration Patient Education/Agreement Form Education and agreement related to this topic required signatures from the HHD training nurse, the patient, and the Care Partner. This form did not have signatures from the patient or the Care Partner. 1f) HHD IV Iron Self-Administration Skills Checklist There were 25 skills listed to be validated by both the patient and the Care Partner. Each skill required one demonstration by the HHD training nurse and two separate return demonstrations, each return demonstration by the patient and by the Care Partner. Documentation indicated that each skill, at the time of demonstration, required initials by the HHD training nurse. The form also included a section for the patient and the Care Partner to sign and date, indicating they had completed the education for that area. However, there were no initials by the HHD training nurse (each of the 25 skills × 3 = 75 opportunities missed), and the documentation was not signed by either the patient or the Care Partner. 1g) HHD IV Antibiotic Self-Administration Education Tool/Agreement Form Education and agreement related to this topic required signatures from the HHD training nurse, the patient, and the Care Partner. This form did not have signatures from the patient or the Care Partner. 1h) HHD IV Antibiotic Self-Administration Skills Checklist There were 20 skills listed to be validated by both the patient and the Care Partner. Each skill required one demonstration by the HHD training nurse and two separate return demonstrations, each return demonstration by the patient and by the Care Partner. Documentation indicated that each skill, at the time of demonstration, required initials by the HHD training nurse. The form also included a section for the patient and the Care Partner to sign and date, indicating they had completed the education for that area. However, there were no initials by the HHD training nurse (each of the 20 skills × 3 = 60 opportunities missed), and the documentation was not signed by either the patient or the Care Partner. On 12/15/25 at 12:45 PM, an interview was conducted with Employee A, RN - HHD Training Nurse. Employee A confirmed that he did not always initial where required and did not always obtain signatures from Patient #1 or the Care Partner. He acknowledged these were required items On 12/15/25 at 3:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Senior Manager of Clinical Services. She confirmed the missing HHD training nurse initials and the missing required signatures from Patient #1 and the Care Partner. She stated these were required elements to ensure both the patient and the Care Partner were trained and proficient in conducting Home Hemodialysis. A Review of the facility policy related to Home Hemodialysis indicated that all training must be signed by the HHD training nurse, the patient, and the Care Partner if a Care Partner was required.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 11, 2012.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 34 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Duval County, 33 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5, 8 rated 3 of 5, 11 rated 2 of 5, 11 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.