Hearth Record

Fresenius Kidney Care South Avenue

A dialysis facility in Birmingham, Alabama 35222

3201 3rd Ave South, Birmingham, Alabama 35222. (205) 209-3125.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 2, 2025: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 2, 2025: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Bacterial Control - Disinfect Monthly/Disinfection Dwell

    The inspectors’ words, 279 words

    “BACT CONTROL-DISINFECT 1X/MO/DWELL CFR(s): 494.40(a) 7 Strategies for bacterial control 7.1 General: disinfect monthly/disinfection dwell Routine low-level disinfection of the pipes should be performed to control bacterial contamination of the distribution system. The frequency of disinfection will vary with the design of the system and the extent to which biofilm has already formed in existing systems, but disinfection must be performed at least monthly. A mechanism should be incorporated in the distribution system to ensure that disinfectant does not drain from pipes during the disinfection period. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22676 Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of one bottles of “Minncare Residual Test Strips” that were used for testing for clearance of the Minncare Disinfectant solution after disinfecting the reverse osmosis machine (RO) were not expired. This had the potential to affect all 47 in-center hemodialysis patients receiving care at the facility. Findings include: During an observation in the water room on 06/30/24 at 9:15 AM, revealed one bottle of opened “Minncare Residual Test Strips” manufactures expiration date was 03/20/25. During an interview with the Clinic Manager 3 and Biomedical Technician 6 on 06/30/25 at 9:15 AM, they confirmed the above findings. Review of the facility’s policy, titled: “Storage of Supplies and Supply Expiration Dates for Inpatient Service,” dated 07/01/24, indicated, “The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for storage of supplies, supply expiration dates, and removal of expired supplies. Supplies will be rotated First in first out. Any item that is expired, damaged, or has experienced loss of packaging integrity (tom, wet, punctured) will be removed from stock and disposed of appropriately.””

    Rule V0219. Standard-level.

  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22676 Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct a nursing post assessment for one of five sampled in-center dialysis patients (Patient (P4). Failure to assess a patient could have a negative impact on the patient outcome on all 47 patients receiving in-center dialysis treatments at this facility. Findings include: Review of P4’s “Treatment Detail Report” in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed on 06/24/25 that there was not a Registered Nurse (RN) assessment conducted. During an interview on 07/01/25 at 3:00 PM, Clinic Manager 3 confirmed the above findings, and that there was not an RN assessment completed. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” dated 05/01/23, indicated, “The Registered Nurse will assess/reassess post treatment as indicated. Document findings in the patient’s record”.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 477 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22676 Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the individualized dialysis plan (an artificial means of kidney function that removes the waste and excess fluid from the blood by passing through a filter) by following the physician prescription as determined by the medical provider for three of five sampled in-center dialysis patients (Patient (P1), P3 and P4). Failure to follow the medical providers’ dialysis prescription had the potential to negatively impact on the effectiveness of the prescribed dialysis treatments for all 47 patients receiving in-center dialysis treatments at this facility. Findings include: 1. Review of P1’s “Treatment Detail Report” in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a prescribed Blood Flow Rate (BFR) of 450 milliliters per minute (ml/min), and a Dialysate Flow Rate (DFR) of autoflow 1.5 ml/min or 675 ml/min. Review of two of six flowsheets from 06/17/25 through 06/28/25 indicated the following: a. On 06/24/25 from 8:07 AM until 10:07 AM, the BFR was documented at 350 ml/min and the DFR at 600 ml/min. b. On 06/26/25 from 10:13 AM until 11:27 AM, the BFR was documented at 300 ml/min and the DFR was documented at 500 ml/min. There was no documentation for the change to the prescribed BFR and DFR. 2. Review of P3’s “Treatment Detail Report” in the EMR revealed a prescribed BFR of 450 ml/min, and a DFR of autoflow 1.5 ml/min or 675 ml/min. Review of one of six flowsheets from 06/17/25 through 06/26/25 indicated the following: a. On 06/19/25 from 8:24 AM until 10:36 AM, the BFR was documented at 400 ml/min and the DFR at 600 ml/min. There was no documentation for the change to the prescribed BFR and DFR. 3. Review of P4’s “Treatment Detail Report” in the EMR revealed a prescribed BFR of 400 ml/min, and a DFR of autoflow 1.5 ml/min or 675 ml/min. Review of one of six flowsheets from 06/07/25 through 06/26/25 indicated the following: a. On 06/20/25 from 11:18 AM until 1:35 PM, the BFR was documented at 350 ml/min. There was no documentation for the change to the prescribed BFR. During an interview on 07/01/25 at 11:30 AM, Clinic Manager 3 confirmed the above findings, and that staff did not follow the physician’s order for dialysis treatment. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” dated 05/01/23, states “Check that blood flow is being achieved or reason documented in medical record if unable to meet prescribed flow rate. Check Dialysis flow rate setting is correct, and prescribed flow is being delivered”.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

  • Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 347 words

    “POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22676 Based on record review, policy review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Plan of Care (POC) participation, and that POC information was provided timely for one of five patients (Patient (P) 4) reviewed for care planning. This failure had the potential to negatively impact on the effectiveness of the dialysis treatments for the 47 patients receiving dialysis at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility’s form titled, “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care” revealed, “ ...the form required a patient signature and date when the plan was reviewed, and the patient understood the plan...” Review of P4’s 30-day POC, dated 03/18/25, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the “Plan of Care” section revealed, P4 did not sign the POC acknowledgement form. There was no documented evidence the patient received the POC information. In addition, the 90-day POC was completed on 06/25/25 P4 did not sign the POC form and there was no documented evidence the patient received the POC information. During an interview on 07/01/25 at 3:00 PM, Clinical Manager 3 confirmed the facility developed P4’s 30-day POC on 03/18/25 and the 90-day POC on 06/25/25 and there was no documented evidence that the patient was provided with the information. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care,” dated 07/03/23 revealed, “ ...An interdisciplinary Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care must be completed by the interdisciplinary team members, per the frequency outlined in the Condition for Coverage ...The patient’s plan of care will be signed by all members of the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team].””

    Rule V0556. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 2, 2025Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 2, 1982.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 20 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Jefferson County, 27 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5, 13 rated 3 of 5, 10 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.