Fmc Mobile
A dialysis facility in Mobile, Alabama 36607
2620 Old Shell Rd, Mobile, Alabama 36607. (251) 476-2762.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 24 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 15, 2025: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 15, 2025: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 250 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22676 Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during central venous catheter access for one of one patient (Patient (P)7) observed with a central venous catheter. Failure to perform proper hand hygiene has the potential to place all patients and visitors at risk for cross contamination, resulting in increased infections to all 105 patients receiving dialysis at the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 08/14/25 at 10:45 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)7 was observed accessing P13’s central venous catheter for dialysis treatment. RN9 repeatedly used the hand sanitizer that was mounted on the patient’s dialysis machine at the next patient’s station instead of using the hand sanitizer mounted on P13’s dialysis machine. During an interview on 08/14/25 at 11:00 AM, RN7 confirmed the above findings. During an interview on 08/14/25 at 11:15 AM, the Clinic Manager 2 confirmed that the staff should use the hand sanitizer mounted on the machine of the patient they are providing care to. Review of the facility’s policy titled “Hand Hygiene” dated 11/06/23 indicated, “Clean the dialysis machine-mounted dispenser and bracket between patients with a 1:100 bleach ... Decontaminated using alcohol-based hand rub or by washing hands with antimicrobial soap and water ...””
-
Ic - Items Taken To Station Disposed/Dedicated Or Disinfected
The inspectors’ words, 330 words
“IC-IF TO STATION=DISP/DEDICATE OR DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. -- Nondisposable items that cannot be cleaned and disinfected (e.g., adhesive tape, cloth covered blood pressure cuffs) should be dedicated for use only on a single patient. -- Unused medications (including multiple dose vials containing diluents) or supplies (syringes, alcohol swabs, etc.) taken to the patient’s station should be used only for that patient and should not be returned to a common clean area or used on other patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22676 Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the hemostats and clamps used in patient care were disinfected appropriately. This increased the risk of cross contamination for 105 of 105 patients receiving care at the facility. Findings include: During a tour of the treatment floor on 08/13/25 at 8:55 AM, the blue clamps (hemostats) used in patient care were observed to be drained, next to the bleach container. There was one clamp seen on the top of the pile that was observed to be in the closed position versus the open position to ensure adequate disinfection and drainage of the interior surface of the clamp. During an interview on 08/13/25 at 8:55 AM, the Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT) 17 confirmed the clamp on top was in the closed position and should have been in the open position during draining after disinfection. During an interview on 08/13/25 at 9:30 AM, the Clinic Manager 2 confirmed the clamps were to be in the opened position when draining. He/she confirmed the staff did not follow the policy. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Cleaning and Disinfecting Plastic Hemostat Clamps and Vascular Clamp” dated 07/01/24 revealed, “. . . Air dry in the opened position . . .””
-
Achieve Adequate Clearance
The inspectors’ words, 369 words
“POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22676 Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the individualized dialysis plan (an artificial means of kidney function that removes the waste and excess fluid from the blood by passing through a filter) by following the physician prescription as determined by the medical provider for two of 10 sampled in-center dialysis patients (Patient (P)2 and P10). Failure to follow the medical providers’ dialysis prescription had the potential to negatively impact on the effectiveness of the prescribed dialysis treatments for all 105 patients receiving in-center dialysis treatments at this facility. Findings include: Review of P2’s electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a prescribed Blood Flow Rate (BFR) of 425 milliliters per minute (ml/min). Review of three of six “Post Treatment” flowsheets from 07/24/25 through 08/12/25 in the EMR indicated the following: a. On 07/26/25 from 8:08 AM until 12:08 PM, the BFR was documented at 400 ml/min. b. On 08/09/25 from 8:00 AM until 11:47 AM the BFR was documented at 400 ml/min. c. On 08/12/25 from 7:45 AM until 11:32 AM the BFR was documented at 400 ml/min. There was no documentation for the change to the prescribed BFR in the EMR. Review of P10’s EMR revealed a prescribed Dialysis Flow Rate (DFR) of 800 ml/min. Review of one of six “Post Treatment” flow sheets from 07/31/25 through 08/12/25 in the EMR indicated the following. a. On 08/09/25 from 12:45 PM until 3:37 PM the DFR was documented at 500 ml/min. There was no documentation for the change to the prescribed BFR in the EMR. During an interview on 08/13/25 at 1:15 AM, Clinic Manager 2 confirmed the above findings and that staff did not follow the physician’s order for dialysis treatment. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” dated 05/01/23 revealed, “Check dialysate flow rate setting is correct, and the correct prescribed flow is being delivered ...””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 4, 1979.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- 24 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (43 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 55% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 15 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Mobile County, 15 have a star rating from CMS: 3 rated 4 of 5, 7 rated 3 of 5, 4 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.