SACC at Lorton Community Center
A child day center in Lorton, Virginia 22079
9520 Richmond Highway, Lorton, Virginia 22079. (703) 233-2548.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 23 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jul 12026 the latest visit on record
- 80 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
15 inspections on record, the latest on Jul 1, 2026.
23 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
23 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Apr 1, 2026: inspection5 deficiencies
-
When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance.
The inspectors’ words, 112 words
“On 3/30/26, when Staff #1 and #2 were supervising Child #1, a 5-year-old, on the community playground they did not ensure the child’s care and protection when staff were unaware that the child was left unsupervised and marked by staff as having departed for the day. Staff were unaware of the child’s whereabouts until the parent arrived to pick the child up. The playground is used by the community on a daily basis and is not closed to the public when the SACC program is operating. When interviewed, Child #1 stated that during the time he was not supervised he was playing with a stranger he met that day on the playground.”
-
Children under 10 years of age shall always be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“On 3/30/26, Child #1, a 5-year-old, was not maintained in sight and sound supervision by staff. As observed on video footage, from 5:17-5:47pm, Child #1 was left unsupervised on the community playground when Staff #1 and #2 went inside the community center and entered the child care room. The program’s classroom does not have a view of the playground. [Refer to Photos #1, #2 and #3.]”
-
The operational responsibilities of the licensee shall include ensuring that the center’s activities, services, and facilities are maintained in compliance with these standards, the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by these standards, and the terms of the current license issued by the department.
The inspectors’ words, 273 words
“The center’s policies and procedures for identifying where attending children are at all times, playground supervision, and for the departure of children state the following: -That each staff will ensure the care, protection, guidance and sight and sound supervision of all children at all times, by accounting for the children in their care on their attendance accountability checklist before transitioning to another location; -Each staff will also record departure information, name-to-face will be conducted periodically to visually verify each child is present; -Visually verify that all children have left the area before moving to the next location, all programs areas and outdoor spaces will be checked; -Children must be signed out by an authorized person at the time of departure and a visual check of the child completed; -Staff will report any attendance discrepancies to the supervisor immediately, and staff assigned to the main pick-up location (in the building) will be responsible for the master center attendance accountability checklist. On 3/30/26, each staff did not account for children and their departure on their own attendance accountability checklist. A child was marked as departed for the day without a visual check of the child departing with an authorized person. Periodic name-to-face checks were not completed. A visual check of the playground area was not completed before leaving to go inside the center, resulting in Child #1, a 5-year-old, being left alone unsupervised on the playground. Though attendance discrepancies were noticed by staff while on the playground, they did not report them to the supervisor. The master center attendance accountability checklist (in the building) was not used to track when children departed for the day.”
-
Staff records shall be kept for each staff person, to include the staff person’s name, address, verification of age, job title and date of employment; and name, address and phone number of a person to be notified in an emergency, background checks and health information.
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“There was no documentation of a completed Sworn Disclosure Statement (SDS) on-file for Staff #1. There was no staff record on-site for Staff #2 that documented the staff person’s name, address, verification of age, job title and date of employment; and name, address and phone number of a person to be notified in an emergency. Management was unable to provide documentation of a TB screening for Staff #2 and did not know if a current TB screening existed. Additionally, there was no documentation of a completed Sworn Disclosure Statement (SDS) on-file for Staff #2. Management reported extenuating circumstances that are preventing them from accessing some staff records for an undetermined amount of time”
-
For each group of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“On 3/30/26, the written record of daily attendance (defined by the program as the attendance accountability checklist), was inaccurately completed by Staff #1, documenting that Child #1, a 5-year-old, had been picked up by a parent. The child never departed and was left unsupervised on the community playground for 30 minutes. No staff visually saw the child depart. In a written statement, Staff #1, who was the only staff with an attendance accountability checklist, stated that he positioned himself on the parking lot side of the playground to serve as the point of contact for arriving parents, and as parents arrived he would call the child over and walk them to the parent for dismissal.”
Feb 17, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection4 deficiencies
-
The center shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions documented in the allergy plan required in 8VAC20-780-60 A 8. This list shall be dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present.
“All center staff were not aware of where the allergy list was kept and the list on-file did not include information about Child #9 and Child #10 who have been diagnosed with food allergies.”
-
The medication authorization shall be available to staff during the entire time it is effective.
“There was no medication authorization form signed by parent and physician available to staff for a prescription medication on-site for Child #10.”
-
All staff who work directly with children shall have a current certification in CPR appropriate to the ages of children in care.
“The CPR certification for Staff #2 expired 12/23/25.”
-
All staff who work directly with children shall have a current certification in First Aid appropriate to the ages of children in care.
“The First Aid certification for Staff #2 expired 12/23/25.”
Sep 26, 2025: inspection4 deficiencies
-
When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care and protection.
“On 9/22/25, staff did not ensure the care and protection of a 5 year-old child, Child #1, when after receiving allegations/report of concerns about Staff #1’s recent interactions with Child #1, they immediately placed the child back into the direct-care of Staff #1. When interviewed, Staff #2 stated that staffing could have been rearranged to prevent Child #1 and Staff #1 from being placed together.”
-
The operational responsibilities of the licensee shall include ensuring that the center’s services are maintained in compliance with these standards and the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by these standards.
The inspectors’ words, 229 words
“No staff ensured compliance with licensing standards and SACC mandated reporting policies/procedures when delaying a report of suspected abuse to child protective services ( CPS ) for over 48-hours after receiving the allegations from a parent. During the 48-hour time period of when the allegations were reported to SACC staff and when SACC staff reported the allegations to CPS (9/22/25-9/24/25), Staff #2, on 9/22/25, reported to the regional manager, Staff #5, the plans to interview Staff #1, #3 and #4, about the allegations. Staff #5 reportedly attempted to contact another program manger, Staff #6, to discuss the allegations but was unsuccessful in reaching them and told Staff #2 to “use your judgement” in deciding as to whether to report the allegations to CPS . On 9/24/25, at 8:37am, Staff #2 filed an incident report within the SACC reporting system that included the allegations made and interviews conducted. Also on 9/24/25, Staff #1 was transferred to work at a SACC administrative office due to the allegations made. Staff #2 reported that they are told to “get the stories first” before reporting to CPS and questioned SACC training and policy being inconsistent with the mandated reporting requirements. The SACC mandated reporting written policy states that staff are to report suspected abuse and neglect “as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after having a suspicion of a reportable offense.””
-
In order to promote the child’s physical, intellectual, emotional, and social well-being and growth, staff shall interact with the child and one another to provide needed help, comfort, support.
“During interviews conducted, it was learned that Staff #1, has a history of inappropriate interactions with other staff, to include verbal disagreements and outbursts that include sarcastic comments made in front of the children. On at least one occasion Staff #1 used profane language in the presence of children, and on 9/19/25 Staff #1 spoke to Child #1 in a strong/stern tone of voice that caused the child to cry.”
-
Any suspected incident of child abuse shall be reported in accordance with the Code of Virginia 63.2-1509-Mandated reporting of suspected child abuse to child protective services ( CPS ) as soon as possible, but not longer than 24 hours.
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“No staff reported allegations of suspected abuse to CPS within 24 hours of having knowledge of a parent’s reported concerns. On 9/22/25, at approximately 7:05am, Staff #2 received a report of allegations/concerns about an incident between Staff #1 and Child #1 that occurred on 9/19/25. On 9/24/25, at 1:16pm, over 48 hours later, in response to the parents persistence of wanting a response and remedy to the reported concerns, Staff #2 made a report to CPS . When interviewed, Staff #2 stated that although they believed at the time they were following SACC policy, they now felt like the child’s voice had been silenced by staff not reporting the incident promptly to CPS .”
Sep 23, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
Staff records shall be kept on-site for each staff person and include the employee’s name, address and phone as well as the name, address and phone number for an emergency contact person.
“There was no documentation of this information for Staff #5 and Staff #6 on-file.”
Oct 9, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation. Each child shall have a physical exam completed by a physician within 30-days after the first day of attendance.
“1 of 3 children’s records did not include a physical exam. The record for Child #1 did not include a physical exam. The child attended the program last school-year.”
-
Staff shall request at least annually parent confirmation that the required information in the child’s record is up-to-date. Such sharing of information shall be documented.
“2 of 3 child records did not include documentation of the parents annual review of required information. The documents on-file for Child #2 and #3 were dated September 2022.”
-
Repeat violation. The center shall maintain a written record of children’s serious and minor injuries in which entries are made the day of occurrence.
“4 of 7 written injury reports did not include a compete description of the child’s injury.”
Mar 7, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-130-A
“Repeat violation and systemic deficiency. Based on records reviewed, 1 of 4 children’s records did not include documentation of immunizations prior to the child attending. Evidence: The record for Child #4 did not include a immunizations.”
-
8VAC20-780-140-A
“Based on records reviewed, 1 of 4 children’s records did not include documentation of a physical exam within the first 30-days of enrollment. Evidence: The record for Child #1 did not include a physical exam.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Based on observations made, hazardous substances were not kept in a locked place. Evidence: An assortment of cleaning supplies were observed on an open shelf within reach of the children in a storage closet. The door to the storage closet was propped open, the cleaning supplies were approximately 2’ inside the door and children were observed going into the storage closet.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-P
“Based on records reviewed, 3 of 7 written injury reports did not include required information. Evidence: 3 reports did not document the time the parent was notified of the child’s injury.”
Dec 11, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the organization did not ensure that all employees undergo a background check every five years from the date of the initial check.
“Evidence: Staff #4 criminal record check was originally conducted June 13 2018 and a repeat check was not documented to have a occurred.”
-
Based on record review, the organization did not ensure that, at least every two years from the date of the first initial screening or testing, staff members obtain and submit the results of a follow-up tuberculosis screening.
“Evidence: Staff #3 and Staff #4 Records did not contain documentation of follow-up screenings. Staff #4 date of previous screening was listed as November 8, 2021”
Oct 23, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review, 1 of 2 child records reviewed did not have documentation that the children received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center.
“Evidence: Child #1 does not have an immunization record on file with the center.”
All 15 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 1, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 1, 2026 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Sep 26, 2025 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Sep 23, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 23, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 25, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 25, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 9, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Oct 4, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 7, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Dec 11, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Oct 23, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 14, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Mar 27, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 5 years - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 80 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 1353 child care providers in Fairfax County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 23.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| SACC at Lorton Community Center This child care provider | 23 |
| KinderCare Learning Centers #741 | 21 |
| The Merit School of Gunston (#11) | 17 |
| SACC-Gunston | 7 |
| Testey Hamdael | 9 |
| Hamdi Eslaquit | 14 |
| The Nest Academy | 10 |
| Stacy Bennett | 9 |
| Fozia Hussain | 17 |
| Shazia Younis | 5 |
| Nagma Ali | 1 |
| New Hope Church | 5 |
| SACC at Laurel Hill | 16 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.