Lily Pad at Metro Park
A child day center in Alexandria, Virginia 22310
6361 Walker Lane #c110, Alexandria, Virginia 22310. (701) 347-7885.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 35 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 252026 the latest visit on record
- 57 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
17 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 25, 2026.
35 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
35 deficiencies in 8 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Aug 25, 2026: inspection4 deficiencies
-
The center is required to have employees undergo a background check every five years.
“The most recent central registry check for staff #1 was overdue by five months. The most recent national criminal background check for staff #1 was overdue by six months.”
-
A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the last screening.
“Staff #1?s updated screening was due 7 months ago, and Staff #4?s updated screening was due 6 days ago. At the time of the inspection, the updated screenings had not yet been completed.”
-
Staff shall complete a minimum of 16 hours of training annually, appropriate to the age of children in care.
“Staff #1 obtained four of the 16 required hours in 2025. Staff #3 obtained eight of the 16 required hours in 2025.”
-
Each center shall maintain and keep at the center a separate record for each child enrolled that contains all of the required information.
“The record for Child #2, enrolled for 3 months, was missing a second emergency contact.”
May 28, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and shall be intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts. At the time of the inspection, Child #1 (age 2? years) was sitting on their knees during circle time. Staff #1 was observed approaching Child #1, placing one hand on the child’s left forearm and the other on the right forearm, lifting the child, and repositioning the child from a kneeling position to a seated position on the floor. Staff #1’s behavior guidance method was not constructive in nature and was not an age-and stage-appropriate redirection technique.”
Feb 3, 2026: inspection4 deficiencies
-
The license and any other documents required shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises.
“At the time of the inspection, the findings from the most recent inspection, dated 12/16/2025, were not posted.”
-
The center must request a search of the central registry prior to the employee’s first day of employment.
“Staff #5, who had been employed for three months, did not have a central registry search requested.”
-
The center shall provide to the licensing representative an annual fire inspection report from the appropriate fire official having jurisdiction.
“At the time of the inspection, the center’s annual fire inspection report was 8 days overdue.”
-
The center is required to keep a current list of all known allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions in each room or area where children are present.
“At the time of the inspection, classrooms #1 and #2, which had children present, did not have an allergy list.”
Oct 1, 2025: inspection9 deficiencies
-
When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance.
The inspectors’ words, 527 words
“On Friday, September 26, 2025, at approximately 2:32 pm, video footage showed Child #1 (age 17 months) waking from a nap and beginning to cry. Staff #1, who had been lying next to the child, stood up and walked away. Child #1 continued crying for approximately three minutes before Staff #2 responded and attended to the child. At approximately 2:35 pm, video footage showed Child #2 (age 24 months) standing in front of a classroom table when Staff #1 used their right hand to grab and lift Child #2 by the upper right arm, and then placed the child in a seat, and pushed the chair in. At approximately 2:36 pm, video footage showed Staff #2 walking with Child #1 (age 17 months), who was crying, toward the classroom cubbies. Staff #2 offered Child #1 Goldfish crackers. Staff #1 said, ?No, don’t give them that. They do not deserve it.? Staff #1 proceeded to grab Child #1?s left hand with their right hand. Child #1 turned slightly, and Staff #1 pulled Child #1 behind them while walking between two tables. Child #1 fell on the floor and hit the back of their head. Staff #1 looked back and saw Child #1 on the floor. Using their left hand, Staff #1 pulled Child #1 up by their upper left arm. Staff #1 rubbed the back of Child #1?s head and said, ?Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah,? before handing Child #1 to Staff #3 for diapering. At approximately 2:39 pm, video footage showed Child #3 (age 22 months) standing next to a classroom table. Staff #1 told Child #3 to sit down for snack, but Child #3 continued to stand. Staff #2 then told Child #3 to sit down. Child #3 continued to stand. Staff #2 walked over to Child #3, bent over next to them, and yelled, ?Go sit down.? Staff #2 then grabbed and pulled Child #3 by their right arm and plopped them in a chair. At approximately 2:54 pm, video footage showed Child #4 (age 22 months) and Child #5 (age 18 months) sitting in their chairs away from their classroom table. Staff #1 walked over to Child #4 and #5 and pushed Child #4?s chair back to the table. Child #5 was sitting up on their knees, backwards in their chair, when Staff #1 used both hands to grab Child #5 underneath their underarms and plopped the child in their seat. Staff #1 then pushed Child #5?s chair in. At approximately 2:56 pm, video footage showed that during snack time, Child #5 got out of their seat at the table and ran to the carpet area. Staff #2 saw Child #5 (age 18 months) at the carpet area, then walked over to the table, removed Child #5?s chair, and replaced it with a wooden chair that had a buckle attached. Staff #2 buckled Child #5 in the chair. Child #5 began to cry, and Staff #2 shook their head ?no? at Child #5. Child #5 stayed buckled in their chair for approximately ten minutes.. Staff #1 and Staff #2 did not ensure their care, protection, and guidance when supervising children #1,#2, #3, #4, and #5.”
-
The variety of daily activities for all age groups shall be age and stage appropriate and provide opportunities for teacher-directed, self-directed, and self-chosen tasks and activities; a balance of active and quiet activities; individual and group activities; and curiosity and exploration.
“On Friday, September 26, 2025, video footage from Classroom #1 showed that afternoon snack time lasted approximately 30 minutes. The classroom’s daily schedule stated 15 minutes for snack time. However, the children remained seated at tables without an opportunity to engage in alternative activities after completing their snack.”
-
Repeat violation systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 219 words
“The operational responsibilities of the licensee shall include ensuring that the center’s activities, services, and facilities are maintained in compliance with these standards, the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by these standards, and the terms of the current license issued by the department. On Friday, September 26, 2025, video footage from Classroom #1 showed Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3 not following the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by the standards regarding procedures of action in case of injury and discipline policies including acceptable and unacceptable discipline measures. The center’s procedures for action in case of injury required teachers to use accident reports to record and communicate a child’s injury or an incident. The report included what the injured child was doing prior to getting hurt and how the teacher responded. Teachers addressed the situation with all families involved either by phone during the day or at pickup. The center’s discipline policy defined unacceptable discipline as: roughly handling or shaking a child, restricting movement through binding or tying, enclosure in a small confined space or any space that the child could not freely exit, withholding or forcing of food or rest, etc. Staff #1, #2, and #3 signed the center’s orientation form acknowledging the center’s policies and procedures required by the standards.”
-
Behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and shall be intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts.
The inspectors’ words, 421 words
“On Friday, September 26, 2025, at approximately 2:36 pm, video footage showed Staff #2 walking with Child #1 (age 17 months), who was crying, toward the classroom cubbies. Staff #2 offered Child #1 Goldfish crackers. Staff #1 said, ?No, don’t give them that. They do not deserve it.? Staff #1 proceeded to grab Child #1?s left hand with their right hand. Child #1 turned slightly, and Staff #1 pulled Child #1 behind them while walking between two tables. Child #1 fell on the floor and hit the back of their head. Staff #1 looked back and saw Child #1 on the floor. Using their left hand, Staff #1 pulled Child #1 up by their upper left arm. Staff #1 rubbed the back of Child #1?s head and said, ?Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah,? before handing Child #1 to Staff #3 for diapering. At approximately 2:39 pm, video footage showed Child #3 (age 22 months) standing next to a classroom table. Staff #1 told Child #3 to sit down for snack, but Child #3 continued to stand. Staff #2 then told Child #3 to sit down. Child #3 continued to stand. Staff #2 walked over to Child #3, bent over next to them, and yelled, ?Go sit down.? Staff #2 then grabbed and pulled Child #3 by their right arm and plopped them in a chair. At approximately 2:54 pm, video footage showed Child #4 (age 22 months) and Child #5 (age 18 months) sitting in their chairs away from their classroom table. Staff #1 walked over to Child #4 and #5 and pushed Child #4?s chair back to the table. Child #5 was sitting up on their knees, backwards in their chair, when Staff #1 used both hands to grab Child #5 underneath their underarms and plopped the child in their seat. Staff #1 then pushed Child #5?s chair in. At approximately 2:56 pm, video footage showed that during snack time, Child #5 got out of their seat at the table and ran to the carpet area. Staff #2 saw Child #5 (age 18 months) at the carpet area, then walked over to the table, removed Child #5?s chair, and replaced it with a wooden chair that had a buckle attached. Staff #2 buckled Child #5 in the chair. Child #5 began to cry, and Staff #2 shook their head ?no? at Child #5. Child #5 stayed buckled in their chair for approximately ten minutes.. Staff #1 and Staff #2?s method of behavior guidance was not age-and stage-appropriate, and constructive in nature.”
-
The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: Physical punishment, striking a child, roughly handling or shaking a child, restricting movement through binding or tying, forcing a child to assume an uncomfortable position, or exercise as punishment, enclosure in a small confined space, or any space that the child cannot freely exit.
The inspectors’ words, 454 words
“On Friday, September 26, 2025, at approximately 2:35 pm, video footage showed Child #2 (age 24 months) standing in front of a classroom table when Staff #1 used their right hand to grab and lift Child #2 by the upper right arm, and then placed the child in a seat, and pushed the chair in. At approximately 2:36 pm, video footage showed Staff #2 walking with Child #1 (age 17 months), who was crying, toward the classroom cubbies. Staff #2 offered Child #1 Goldfish crackers. Staff #1 said, ?No, don’t give them that. They do not deserve it.? Staff #1 proceeded to grab Child #1?s left hand with their right hand. Child #1 turned slightly, and Staff #1 pulled Child #1 behind them while walking between two tables. Child #1 fell on the floor and hit the back of their head. Staff #1 looked back and saw Child #1 on the floor. Using their left hand, Staff #1 pulled Child #1 up by their upper left arm. Staff #1 rubbed the back of Child #1?s head and said, ?Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah,? before handing Child #1 to Staff #3 for diapering. At approximately 2:39 pm, video footage showed Child #3 (age 22 months) standing next to a classroom table. Staff #1 told Child #3 to sit down for snack, but Child #3 continued to stand. Staff #2 then told Child #3 to sit down. Child #3 continued to stand. Staff #2 walked over to Child #3, bent over next to them, and yelled, ?Go sit down.? Staff #2 then grabbed and pulled Child #3 by their right arm and plopped them in a chair. At approximately 2:54 pm, video footage showed Child #4 (age 22 months) and Child #5 (age 18 months) sitting in their chairs away from their classroom table. Staff #1 walked over to Child #4 and #5 and pushed Child #4?s chair back to the table. Child #5 was sitting up on their knees, backwards in their chair, when Staff #1 used both hands to grab Child #5 underneath their underarms and plopped the child in their seat. Staff #1 then pushed Child #5?s chair in. At approximately 2:56 pm, video footage showed that during snack time, Child #5 got out of their seat at the table and ran to the carpet area. Staff #2 saw Child #5 (age 18 months) at the carpet area, then walked over to the table, removed Child #5?s chair, and replaced it with a wooden chair that had a buckle attached. Staff #2 buckled Child #5 in the chair. Child #5 began to cry, and Staff #2 shook their head ?no? at Child #5. Child #5 stayed buckled in their chair for approximately ten minutes..”
-
Systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 192 words
“Children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water or disposable wipes before and after eating meals or snacks, and after toileting. Staff shall wash their hands with soap and running water before and after a diaper change, and before preparing or serving food or beverages. On Friday, September 26, 2025, in Classroom #1, video footage showed that 10 out of 10 children did not wash their hands with soap and running water before or after snack, and after diapering. Classroom #1?s video footage showed that Staff #3 changed the diapers of 10 children and did not wash their hands with soap and running water after each diaper change. Classroom #1?s video footage showed Staff #2 offering Child #1 Goldfish crackers from their hand. Staff #2 did not wash their hands with soap and water before offering the Goldfish crackers to Child #1. Classroom #1?s video footage showed Staff #1 getting Child #10?s snack from their cubby. Staff #1 opened the snack, ate one item from the bag, and then gave it to Child #10. Staff #1 did not wash their hands with soap and running water before serving Child #10.”
-
Systemic deficiency
“The diapering surface shall be cleaned with soap and at least room temperature water, and sanitized after each use. Individual disposable barriers may be used between each diaper change. On Friday, September 26, 2025, at approximately 2:34 pm in Classroom #1, video footage showed Staff #3 changing the diapers of 10 children without cleaning and disinfecting the diapering surface between each change. A paper roll was observed on the changing table; however, it was not replaced between several diaper changes.”
-
The center shall notify the parent by the end of the day of any known minor injuries.
“On Friday, September 26, 2025, video footage showed Staff #1 grab Child #1?s left hand with their right hand. Child #1 turned slightly, and Staff #1 pulled Child #1 behind them while walking between two tables. Child #1 fell on the floor and hit the back of their head. The parents of Child #1 were not notified by the end of the day and were contacted on the next day.”
-
The center shall maintain a written record of children’s serious and minor injuries in which entries are made the day of occurrence.
“On Friday, September 26, 2025, video footage showed Staff #1 grab Child #1?s left hand with their right hand. Child #1 turned slightly, and Staff #1 pulled Child #1 behind them while walking between two tables. Child #1 fell on the floor and hit the back of their head. An injury report was not completed for Child #1 on the day of the occurrence.”
Aug 25, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Areas inside and outside the center were not maintained in a safe condition.
“Chipped paint was observed in a classroom. A section of the playground border was loose and missing four nails, creating a tripping hazard.”
-
The operational responsibilities of the licensee shall include ensuring that the center’s activities, services, and facilities are maintained in compliance with these standards, the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by these standards, and the terms of the current license issued by the department.
“The family handbook states that ?unused and/or expired medications will be returned to the family.? Child #6?s medication was on site and expired a month ago.”
Feb 20, 2025: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“The center is required to obtain documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. Staff #2 is currently working and has a TB screening that was dated 46 days after their first day of employment.”
-
Staff shall complete a minimum of 16 hours of training annually, appropriate to the age of children in care.
“Staff #4 and Staff #5 obtained 2 of the 16 required hours in 2024.”
-
The center shall obtain annual approval from the health department for meeting requirements for water supply and sewage disposal system.
“The center’s environmental sanitation inspection is overdue by 2 months.”
-
Each grouping of children shall have at least one staff regularly present who meets lead teacher qualifications.
“Staff #1 and Staff #2, who did not meet lead teacher qualifications, were alone with a group of preschool children at the time of the inspection.”
-
At least one staff in each classroom or area where children are present shall have current certification in both CPR and first aid.
“Staff #1 and Staff #2 were with a group of eighteen, three -to five-year-old children and were not certified in CPR or first aid.”
-
Documentation shall be maintained for shelter-in-place drills.
“There was no documentation for one of the two shelter-in-place drills conducted in 2024.”
Aug 28, 2024: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not obtain a sworn statement prior to the 1st day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #2’s sworn statement is dated 8/23/2024. 2. Staff #2’s employment date is 08/2/2024.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not obtain a criminal history records check prior to 1st day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #2’s criminal history check results are dated 08/23/2024. 2. Staff #2’s employment date is 08/2/2024.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not request the results of a central registry check prior to employment.
“Evidence: 1. Central registry results for Staff #2 were requested on 8/7/2024. 2. Staff #2’s employment date is 08/2/2024.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review and staff interview, the center did not obtain documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening (TB) at the time of employment. Evidence: 1. Staff #2’s tb test is dated 08/20/2024. 2. Staff #2 employment date is 08/2/2024.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not have at least one staff member on duty who has obtained within the last three years instruction in performing the daily health observation of children.
“Evidence: There was no documentation to verify that any of the staff on duty during the inspection had current daily health observation training.”
Mar 25, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review and staff interview, 1 of 5 staff files indicated that the center failed to obtain an out-of-state child abuse and neglect search request by the end of the 30th day of employment. Evidence: 1. The record of Staff #1 (hired 08/28/2023) did not contain documentation of out-of-state central registry results. 2. Staff #1 indicated living in another state other than Virginia within the last five years on their sworn disclosure statement dated 08/28/2023.”
-
Based on observation and interview, hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides were not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: In the Ducklings Classroom, a spray bottle of Lysol, Febreze, and alcohol isopropyl was stored on a shelf across from the blue napping cots.”
-
Based on observation and staff interviews, electrical outlets did not have protective covers.
“Evidence: 1. In the Ducklings classroom, there was a surge protector with 3 out of 4 outlets uncovered. 2. There was a surge protector with 4 out of 5 outlets uncovered behind the front desk.”
-
Based on record review and staff interview, the center failed to ensure all staff records had all the required documentation.
“Evidence: There was no documentation of proof of education for Staff #2.”
Aug 22, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, 1 of 5 staff files indicated that the facility did not obtain the results of a central registry check by the end of the 30th day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. There was no documentation of central registry results for staff #5. 2. The start date for Staff #5 was listed as 02/21/2023.”
-
Based on record review and interview, 1 of 5 staff files indicated that the facility has not ensured that each staff member has submitted documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Evidence: 1. The TB documentation on file for staff #4 was dated 06/25/2018 and 03/28/2019. 2. The start date for Staff #1 is 07/24/2023”
May 17, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain the results of an out-of-state central registry check for all states employees have resided in within the previous five years.
“Evidence: Staff #1 (DOH: 4/12/2023) record did not contain a central registry check results from a state they have listed as residing in within the previous five years.”
-
Based on a record review and interview, one of five staff records did not contain documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Evidence: The record for staff #1 (DOH: 4/12/2023) did not contain documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not meet all requirements for diaper ointment or cream.
“Evidence: There were no written authorization forms for two of the three diaper creams reviewed.”
Mar 2, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on observation, areas of the center, outside, were not maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition.
“Evidence: 1. There was a separation in the seam of the resilient surfacing due to a tree root, causing a tripping hazard on the playground. 2. Near the burgundy and tan playhouse, the mulch edging used to keep mulch inside the playground was split, exposing a nail, and causing a tripping hazard.”
Jan 26, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on review of five children’s records, the center did not maintain complete children’s records.
“Evidence: There was no documentation of the names, addresses, and phone numbers of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached.”
All 17 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 25, 2026 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jul 15, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 28, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 30, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 3, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 3, 2026 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 1, 2025 | Inspection | 9 violations cited |
| Aug 25, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Feb 20, 2025 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Aug 28, 2024 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Mar 25, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Aug 22, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| May 17, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Mar 2, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jan 26, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Sep 23, 2027.
- Ages: Birth - 5 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 57 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 1353 child care providers in Fairfax County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 35.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Lily Pad at Metro Park This child care provider | 35 |
| La Petite Academy-Manchester Lakes | 24 |
| Maria Mazo | 7 |
| Fairfax County Park Authority-Franconia | 10 |
| Franconia United Methodist Church | 0 |
| Bush Hill Presbyterian Church | 0 |
| Zulekha Yusuf | 7 |
| SACC at Franconia | 12 |
| Daystar Children’s Center | 20 |
| SACC at Bush Hill | 3 |
| Jay Weszelovszky | 5 |
| Surisa Phumtim | 13 |
| Genet Chinklo | 12 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.