Yessenia Torres
A local ordinance approved FDH in Falls Church, Virginia 22043
2234 Pimmit Run Lane, Apt 01, Falls Church, Virginia 22043. (240) 435-8488.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
5 inspections on record, the latest on Dec 4, 2025.
12 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Dec 4, 2025: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“The Vendor shall maintain and keep at the family day home, written or electronic information for each child enrolled that contains all of the required information. The records for Child #1 and Child #4 were missing the following required components: written authorization for emergency medical care. The record for Child #2 was missing the following required components: name, address, and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached, and the home address and telephone number for each parent who has custody.”
-
Vendors who work directly with children shall, annually, complete the department’s health and safety update course.
“Vendor #1 did not complete the department’s 2025 health and safety update course.”
Dec 9, 2024: subsidy health and safety inspection5 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 188 words
“The Vendor shall maintain and keep at the family day home, written or electronic information for each child enrolled that contains all of the required information. The record for Child #1, enrolled for nine months, was missing the following required components: Proof of the child’s identity, name, address, and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached, and written authorization for emergency medical care The record for Child #2, enrolled for eleven months, was missing the following required components: Proof of the child’s identity, name, address, and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached, and written authorization for emergency medical care The record for Child #3, enrolled for nine months, was missing the following required components: Proof of the child’s identity, name, address, and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached, and written authorization for emergency medical care”
-
Documentation of additional immunizations is required once every six months for children under the age of two years. ’
“Child #1, 18 months old, last documented immunization was over 12 months ago. Child #2, 13 months old, last documented immunization was over 10 months ago.”
-
The home shall have an in-service, nonpay telephone.
“The Vendor did not have a in-service, nonpay telephone.”
-
Repeat violation
“Lockdown procedures shall be practiced at least annually. Lockdown procedures were not practiced annually.”
-
The vendor shall maintain a record of the dates of the practice drills for one year.
“There was no documentation of practice drills since November 2023. There was no documentation of shelter-in-place procedures being practiced twice a year.”
Dec 13, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection5 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“Based on interview and record review, the vendor did not maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs. Evidence: 1. The vendor did not have a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documented the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurred. 2. The vendor confirmed the attendance for each child in care has not been documented.”
-
Based on record review, the children’s records were not complete.
The inspectors’ words, 202 words
“Evidence: 1. Child #1 is missing proof of identity. 2. Child #1 is missing immunization records before or on the childs first day of attendance. The first day of attendance is 12/11/2023 3. Child #1 is missing the name, address, and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached. 4. Child #1 is missing the name, address, and telephone number for each custodial parent’s place of employment or school attendance 5. Child #1 is missing the child’s full name, nickname (if any), sex, address, and birthdate. 6. Child #1 is missing the name, home address, and telephone number for each parent who has custody. 7. Child #1 is missing written authorization for emergency medical care should an emergency occur and the parent cannot be located immediately unless the parent presents a written objection for the provision of medical treatment on religious or other grounds 8. Child #1 is missing a written statement that the vendor will notify the parent when the child becomes ill and that the parent will arrange to have the child picked up as soon as possible if so requested by the vendor”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review and interview, the vendor did not complete the departments annual health and safety update course. Evidence: The record for the vendor did not contain documentation of the annual 3-hour updated subsidy training course.”
-
Based on observation, an infant, toddler, or preschool child who falls asleep in a play space other than his own crib, cot, mat, or bed was not moved promptly to their designated sleeping space if the safety or comfort of the infant, toddler, or preschool child is in question.
“Evidence: 1. Child #1 (birthdate unknown- 4-month-old infant) was sleeping in a car seat when the inspector arrived at the home approximately at 10:18 am. 2. The Inspector asked the vendor tranision the sleeping infant to their designed crib.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review, the emergency response drills were not practiced. Evidence: 1. There was no documentation of a shelter-in-place or lockdown drill being practiced. 2. There was documentation of April, May, June, July, and October 2023 evacuation drills.”
Jan 5, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the vendor did not maintain a record for each enrolled child.
“Evidence: Child #1 and #2 did not have a record.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the vendor did not complete the department’s annual health and safety update course.
“Evidence: The record for the vendor did not contain documentation of the annual 3-hour updated subsidy training course.”
-
Based on observation, areas of the family day home, inside, were not maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition.
“Evidence: There was a small area of chipped paint on the wall near the kitchen entrance.”
-
Based on observation, the family day home’s first aid kit did not contain all the required items.
“Evidence: Tweezers and adhesive tape were missing from the first aid kit.”
-
Based on record review, the vendor did not have a written emergency preparedness plan that addresses caregiver responsibility and home readiness with respect to emergency evacuation, relocation, lockdown, and shelter-in-place procedures.
“Evidence: There was no documentation of a written emergency preparedness plan for the family day home.”
-
Based on record review, the emergency response drills were not practiced.
“Evidence: 1. There was no documentation of a shelter-in-place or lockdown drill being practiced during the year 2021-2022. 2. There was documentation of only two fire drills practiced in January and February 2022.”
All 5 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Dec 9, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Dec 13, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jan 5, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Feb 15, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Local Ordinance Approved FDH: Local Ordinance Approved FDH, expires Dec 1, 2026.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Capacity: Not given.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 1353 child care providers in Fairfax County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 12.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Yessenia Torres This child care provider | 12 |
| St. Paul’s Lutheran Church | 2 |
| SACC at Haycock | 22 |
| SACC at Shrevewood | 9 |
| SACC at Westgate | 0 |
| Temple Rodef Shalom Early Childhood Center | 22 |
| Isabel Arellano | 7 |
| Falls Church-McLean Children’s Center | 0 |
| Dina Revollo | 28 |
| Myriam Isaza | 22 |
| Rosa Avellaneda | 18 |
| Feliza Choquez | 35 |
| Dilek Gazioglu | 9 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.