Ms. Huma Farrukh
A family day home in Woodbridge, Virginia 22193
15369 Tina Lane, Woodbridge, Virginia 22193. (703) 310-9202.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 15 deficiencies in the last three years
- May 222026 the latest visit on record
- 12 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
11 inspections on record, the latest on May 22, 2026.
15 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
15 deficiencies in 5 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
May 22, 2026: inspection4 deficiencies
-
The Provider is required to post the current license and findings of the most recent licensing inspection of the facility.
“The most recent licensing inspection of the home and the license was not posted.”
-
(Repeat Violation) The Provider is required to ensure that they have completed the required potable water testing for lead.
“The Provider did not complete the required lead testing.”
-
(Repeat Violation) A landline telephone, excluding a cordless or cell phone, shall be available, operable, and accessible during the family day home’s hours of operation. An operable landline telephone is one that does not require electricity to operate.
“A proper landline telephone was not present in the home.”
-
The provider shall review the emergency plan at least annually and update the plan as needed. The provider shall document in writing each review and update to the emergency plan.
“According to Provider records, the plan was last reviewed 3 years ago.”
Nov 5, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
The Provider is required to ensure that they have completed the required potable water testing for lead.
“The Provider did not complete the required lead testing.”
-
(Repeat Violation) The Provider is required to equip the home with a landline telephone, excluding a cordless or cell phone, that is available and accessible during the family day home’s hours of operation. An operable landline telephone is one that does not require electricity to operate.
“A proper landline telephone was not present in the home.”
Oct 28, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
The Provider is required to equip to home with a landline telephone, excluding a cordless or cell phone, that is available and accessible during the family day home’s hours of operation. An operable landline telephone is one that does not require electricity to operate.
“Evidence: A proper landline telephone was not present in the home.”
-
The Provider is required to have parents conduct an annual review of children’s emergency contact information and obtain the parent’s acknowledgment of the review.
“Evidence: The record for Child #1 and Child #2 did not contain documentation of an annual review of the children’s emergency contacts, nor did the records contain parent acknowledgment of the review.”
-
The Provider is required to ensure that they had posted in a visible area close to the phone, 911 or local number for police, fire, and emergency medical responders; the responsible person for emergency backup care; and the regional poison control center.
“Evidence: There were no emergency numbers posted for 911, local police, fire, and emergency medical services, the emergency backup care person, or the number for poison control.”
-
The Provider is required to review the emergency plan at least annually and update the plan as needed.
“Evidence: According to Provider records, the plan was last reviewed over 18 months ago.”
Jun 11, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and staff interview, the center did not ensure they post the findings of the most recent licensing inspection of the facility.
“Evidence: The last inspection posted was dated 7/11/23, and the last inspection completed was on 11/16/23 and was not posted.”
-
Based on documentation and Provider interview, the Provider did not practice monthly emergency evacuation drills with the children in care.
“Evidence: The Provider provided documentation that there were no emergency evacuation drills completed in November 2023, December 2023, January 2024, and March 2024.”
-
8VAC20-800-90-C
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Based on review of 3 child records, the provider did not ensure they obtained documentation of additional immunizations for a child who is not exempt from the immunization requirements once every 6 months for children under the age of two years. Evidence: 1)The record for Child #1 (age 2) did not contain immunizations once every 6 months for a child under the age of 2 years. The last immunization documentation contained in the record was dated 6/14/23 when the child was 18 months old. 2)The record for Child #2 (age 22 months) did not contain immunizations once every 6 months for a child under the age of 2 years. The last immunization documentation contained in the record was dated 8/11/23 when the child was 12 months old.”
Nov 16, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on review of 2 Caregiver records and Provider interview, the Provider did not ensure that all caregivers obtain a minimum of sixteen clock hours of training annually.
“Evidence: The record for the Provider did not contain documentation of the completion of 16 hours of training in the last year. The Provider confirmed during inspection that they had only completed 13 out of the 16 hours of training required.”
-
Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that a safety strap was used and securely fastened in an infant seat that was occupied.
“Evidence: During inspection, an infant was seated in an high chair where the safety straps were not fastened.”
Sep 27, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
(Repeat Violation) Based on review of Provider and Caregiver records, the Provider did not orient the substitute provider or assistant on the required topics by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities.
“Evidence: There was no documentation and the Provider stated that they had not oriented Caregiver #2 (start date 4/15/23) on the required topics by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities.”
-
(Repeat Violation) Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that children under two years of age and children over two years of age who are not developmentally ready to climb or descend stairs without supervision shall not have access to stairs.
“Evidence: The barrier to block children under the age of 2 years old from climbing or descending a set of wood stairs on the main level of the home does not reach to floor so children are able to climb or descend the stairs.”
-
(Repeat Violation) Based on documentation and Provider interview, the Provider did not ensure that each caregiver receives training regarding emergency evacuation, emergency relocation and shelter-in-place procedures by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities, on an annual basis, and at the time of each plan update.
“Evidence: There was no documentation in the file and the Provider stated that Caregiver #2 (start date 4/15/23) has not received training for emergency evacuation and relocation as well as training on shelter- in-place procedures.”
Jul 11, 2023: inspection17 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and staff interview, the Provider did not ensure they post the findings of the most recent licensing inspection of the facility.
“Evidence: The findings of the most recent licensing inspection of the family day home was not posted.”
-
Based on review of a 3 Household member records, the Provider did not obtain documentation of a completed sworn disclosure statement for each Household member at the time of move-in.
“Evidence: The record for Household member #1 (date of move in 5/24/23) did not contain documentation of a completed sworn disclosure statement at the time of move-in.”
-
Based on interview and review of Provider and caregiver records, the Provider did not ensure that the assistant who is left alone with children have a current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and First aid.
“Evidence: The Provider stated that Caregiver #2 who has been alone with children has not completed First Aid or CPR training.”
-
Based on review of Household member records, the Provider did not obtain a report documenting the absence of tuberculosis for each adult Household member.
“Evidence: The record for Household member #3 (move in date 5/24/23) did not contain a report documenting the absence of Tuberculosis. The Provider stated that this has not yet been completed.”
-
Based on review of Provider and Caregiver records, the Provider did not orient the substitute provider or assistant on the required topics by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities.
“Evidence: There was no documentation and the Provider stated that they had not oriented Caregiver #2 (start date 4/15/23) on the required topics by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities.”
-
Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that potentially poisonous substances were stored in an area inaccessible to children.
“Evidence: Bleach wipes were stored on a shelf in the unlocked bathroom accessible to children.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not cover all unused electrical outlets accessible to children under five years of age with child-resistant protective covers.
“Evidence: 1)In the home entry area, there is an unused outlet accessible to children without a protective cover. 2)In the infant sleeping room where the crib sits against the wall, there is an unused outlet accessible to children without a protective cover. 3)In the eating area, there are 2 unused outlets accessible to children without a protective cover.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that children under two years of age and children over two years of age who are not developmentally ready to climb or descend stairs without supervision shall not have access to stairs.
“Evidence: 1)There was no barrier to block children under the age of 2 years old from climbing or descending a set of wood stairs on the main level of the home. 2)Three of the children in care were playing on the stairs during the inspection, one of the children was under the age of 2 years old. 3)The stairs leading up to the deck from the swingset area do not have a barrier to block children from ascending the stairs.”
-
Description: Based on review of the written attendance record and interview with the Provider, the Provider did not ensure they maintained a written record of children in attendance each day.
“Evidence: During the inspection in was determined there were 4 non-household children present, but the written record reflected there were 3 non-household children present.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on review of 4 child records, the Provider did not obtain all of the required documentation for the children’s records. Evidence: 1)The record for Child #3 did not contain the name, address, and telephone number of 2 designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached. The child had only 1 designated emergency contact listed. 2)The record for Child #4 did not contain the policy number of the child’s medical insurance as required.”
-
Based on review of 4 child records, the Provider did not obtain required documentation of parental review of the Provider’s policies for administration of medications, whether or not the Provider maintains liability insurance, and the provisions of the family day home emergency preparedness and response plan.
“Evidence: The record for Child #4 (start date 11/1/22) did not contain documentation of parental review of the Provider’s policy related to whether or not the provider maintains liability insurance.”
-
Based on observation and interview with staff, the Provider did not ensure that medications, including refrigerated medication and medication for caregivers and household members, was kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: The Provider had Insulin and Amoxicillin stored on a shelf in the door of the refrigerator that was not locked.”
-
Based on review of 4 child records, the Provider did not conduct an annual review of children’s emergency contact information and the parent’s acknowledgment of the review.
The inspectors’ words, 133 words
“Evidence: 1)The record for Child #1 did not contain documentation of an annual review of the child’s emergency contacts, nor did the records contain parent acknowledgment of the review. The last recorded documentation of the review of the child’s emergency contact information was on 8/23/2020. 2)The record for Child #2 did not contain documentation of an annual review of the child’s emergency contacts, nor did the records contain parent acknowledgment of the review. The last recorded documentation of the review of the child’s emergency contact information was on 8/6/2021. 3)The record for Child #3 did not contain documentation of an annual review of the child’s emergency contacts, nor did the records contain parent acknowledgment of the review. The last recorded documentation of the review of the child’s emergency contact information was on 3/30/2022.”
-
Based on documentation and Provider interview, the Provider did not ensure that each caregiver receives training regarding emergency evacuation, emergency relocation and shelter-in-place procedures by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities, on an annual basis, and at the time of each plan update.
“Evidence: There was no documentation in the file and the Provider stated that Caregiver #2 (start date 4/15/23) has not received training for emergency evacuation and relocation as well as training on shelter- in-place procedures.”
-
Based on documentation and Provider interview, the Provider did not practice monthly emergency evacuation drills with the children in care.
“Evidence: The Provider stated and the documentation on file shows that there were no emergency evacuation drills completed in June 2023.”
-
Based on review of 4 child records, the provider did not ensure they obtained documentation of additional immunizations for a child who is not exempt from the immunization requirements once every 6 months for children under the age of two years.
“Evidence: 1)The record for Child #2 (DOB 5/28/21) did not contain immunizations once every 6 months. The last documentation contained in the record was dated 9/20/22. 2) The record for Child #4 (DOB 8/3/22) did not contain immunizations once every 6 months. The last documentation contained in the record was dated 10/4/22.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that bottles be refrigerated and labeled with the child’s full name and the date, if more than one infant is in care.
“Evidence: The bottles for Child #4 and Child #5 were not labeled with the child’s name and date.”
May 12, 2023: inspection15 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and staff interview, the Provider did not ensure they post the findings of the most recent licensing inspection of the facility.
“Evidence: The most recent licensing inspection of the family day home was not posted.”
-
Based on review of 2 Caregiver records, the provider did not obtain documentation of the results of a national fingerprint background check prior to the first day of employment.
“Evidence: The record for Caregiver #2 (Date of Hire 4/15/23), did not contain documentation of a fingerprint background check completed prior to the first day of employment.”
-
Based on review of a 2 Caregiver records, the Provider did not obtain documentation of a completed sworn disclosure statement for each Caregiver prior to date of hire.
“Evidence: The record for Caregiver #2 (date of hire 4/15/23) did not contain documentation of a completed sworn disclosure statement prior to the date of hire”
-
Based on review of 2 Caregiver files, the center did not obtain documentation that a central registry search was completed by the end of the 30th day of employment.
“Evidence: The record for Staff #2 (date of hire 4/15/23) did not contain documentation as of 5/17/23 that a central registry search was completed within 30 days of employment. There were no Central registry results in the file. No documentation of follow up was in the file.”
-
Based on review of 2 Caregiver records and interview with the Provider, the Provider did not ensure they maintain a record for each caregiver.
“Evidence: There was no file onsite for Caregiver #2.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that areas and furnishings of the family day home, inside and outside were maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: In the program space where the children play, there was food scattered on the floor that had not been cleaned up.”
-
Based on observation, the provider did not cover all unused electrical outlets accessible to children under five years of age with child-resistant protective covers.
“Evidence: On the main level of the home in the living room area and in the kitchen area where children under the age of 5 were present, there were 3 unused outlets that were not covered.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that children under two years of age and children over two years of age who are not developmentally ready to climb or descend stairs without supervision shall not have access to stairs.
“Evidence: There was no barrier to block children under the age of 2 years old from climbing or descending stairs on the main level of the home where children were present.”
-
Description: Based on review of the written attendance record and interview with the Provider, the Provider did not ensure they maintained a written record of children in attendance each day.
“Evidence: 1)During the inspection in was determined there were 3 children present, but the written record reflected there were no children present on the day of inspection. 2)The Provider confirmed there was no documentation of a written attendance record completed for those children who attended on 5/11/2023.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that the diapering surface was nonabsorbent and washable.
“Evidence: During inspection, a hole was noticed in the diaper changing pad preventing it from being nonabsorbent and washable.”
-
Based on review of 1 child record, the Provider did not obtain required documentation of parental review of the Provider’s policies for administration of medications, whether or not the Provider maintains liability insurance, and the provisions of the family day home emergency preparedness and response plan.
“Evidence: The record for Child #1 did not contain documentation of parental review of the Provider’s policy for the administration of medications.”
-
Based on observation and interview with staff, the Provider did not ensure that medications, including refrigerated medication and medication for caregivers and household members, was kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: 1)The Provider had Insulin and Amoxicillin stored on the shelves in the door of the refrigerator that was not locked. 2)In the children’s program space in the basement, a bottle of Robitussin was sitting on a low shelf in an unlocked area where children play.”
-
Based on review of one child record, the provider did not conduct an annual review of children’s emergency contact information and the parent’s acknowledgment of the review.
“Evidence: The record for Child #1 did not contain documentation of an annual review of the children’s emergency contacts, nor did the records contain parent acknowledgment of the review.”
-
Based on documentation and Provider interview, the Provider did not practice monthly emergency evacuation drills with the children in care.
“Evidence: The Provider provided documentation that there were no emergency evacuation drills completed in April 2023.”
-
Based on documentation and provider interview, the provider did not have a documentation of a menu for the current one-week period.
“Evidence: During the inspection, the provider stated that they did not have a menu documented and ready for the day of the inspection.”
Nov 14, 2022: inspection14 deficiencies
-
Based on review of 3 children’s records, the Provider did not ensure they had documentation of a physical examination for children in care within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: The file for Child #3 (start date 9/1/21) did not contain documentation of a physical examination.”
-
Based on review of 2 household records, the Provider did not obtain for each Household member a current report of Tuberculosis screening every 2 years from the date of the first screening.
“Evidence: The record for Household member #2 contained a Tuberculosis screening that was last completed on 4/12/19.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that areas and furnishings of the family day home, inside and outside were maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: The gate preventing access to the stairs, was pulling out of the drywall causing the screw to be exposed. The screw was sharp and could snag a child’s skin.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not cover all unused electrical outlets accessible to children under five years of age with child-resistant protective covers.
“Evidence: On the main level of the home in the living room area where children were playing, there were 6 unused outlets that were not covered.”
-
Description: Based on review of the written attendance record and interview with the Provider, the Provider did not ensure they maintained a written record of children in attendance each day.
“Evidence: 1)During the inspection in was determined there were 3 children present, but the written record reflected there were no children present. 2)Documentation of the written attendance record was last completed on 11/10/22.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure cribs meet the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission standards at the time they were manufactured.
“Evidence: Two of the cribs that the Provider has onsite have manufacture dates of 12/2003 and 11/2010 while the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission requires cribs to have a manufacture date of 6/28/2011 or later.”
-
Based on review of 3 child records, the provider did not obtain all of the required documentation for child’s records.
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Evidence: 1)The record for Child #1 and Child #2 did not contain the name address and telephone number of 2 designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached. Each child had only 1 designated emergency contacted listed. 2)The record for Child #1 did not contain the policy number of the child’s medical insurance as required. 3)The record for Child #3 did not contain documentation of the review of the child’s emergency contact information annually. The last recorded documentation of the review of the child’s emergency contact information was on 8/6/2021.”
-
Based on observation, the Provider did not ensure that children’s hands are washed with liquid soap and warm running water before eating.
“Evidence: During the inspection, Child #2 sat down to eat lunch and did not wash his hands prior to eating.”
-
Based on review of 3 child records, the Provider did not obtain required documentation of parental review of the Provider’s policies for administration of medications, whether or not the Provider maintains liability insurance, and the provisions of the family day home emergency preparedness and response plan.
“Evidence: The record for Child #1 did not contain documentation of parental review of the Provider’s policy related to whether or not the provider maintains liability insurance.”
-
Based on observation and interview with staff, the Provider did not ensure that medications, including refrigerated medication and medication for caregivers and household members, was kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: The Provider had insulin stored on the shelves in the door of the refrigerator.”
-
Based on documentation and Provider interview, the Provider did not practice monthly emergency evacuation drills with the children in care.
“Evidence: The Provider provided documentation and stated that there were no emergency evacuation drills completed in January 2022, February 2022, March 2022, June 2022, July 2022, August 2022, September 2022 or October 2022.”
-
Based on documentation and staff interview, the Provider did not practice shelter-in-place procedures a minimum of twice per year.
“Evidence: The Provider provided documentation and stated that there were no shelter-in-place procedures practiced since 8/20/2021.”
-
Based on observation the Provider did not ensure that tables were cleaned after each use, and at least daily.
“Evidence: When Child #2 sat down to eat lunch, the table was not cleaned before they ate.”
-
Based on documentation and Provider interview, the Provider did not have documentation of a menu for the current one-week period or a menu kept on file for one week.
“Evidence: During the inspection, the provider stated that they did not have a menu ready for the current week.”
Apr 8, 2022: inspection9 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-100-A
“Based on review, the provider did not ensure that documentation of physical examinations are obtained prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Evidence: reviewed 5 children’s records and found that Child 1, 3, and 4 did not have documentation of a physical examination. All have been in care for more than 30 days.”
-
8VAC20-800-210-A
“Based on review, the provider did not ensure that they obtained 16 hours of annual training. Evidence: identified through the provider that they did not obtain 16 hours of annual training.”
-
8VAC20-800-280
“Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that potentially poisonous substances are stored in areas inaccessible to children. Evidence: 1) observed 2 containers of clorox wipes, glade air freshener, and plumbing solution accessible to children, on the floor, in the basement bathroom. 2) observed wasp and other bug sprays accessible to children in a bucket in the backyard.”
-
8VAC20-800-320-B
“Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that electrical outlets were covered with child-resistant protective covers. Evidence: Observed uncovered electrical outlets, accessible to children in the following areas: 1) 2 uncovered outlets in the main level bathroom, used by children. 2) 1 uncovered outlet in the basement bathroom, used by children.”
-
8VAC20-800-520-E
“Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that bassinet where the infant slept did not have bumper pads. Evidence: observed that Child 5 was sleeping in a bassinet with a bumper pad.”
-
8VAC20-800-530-F
“Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that there was no soft bedding used under or around an infant. Evidence: observed in the infant nap room, Child 5, sleeping in a bassinet with a bumper pad as well as several blankets placed around and under the sleeping infant’s head.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on review, the provider did not ensure that children’s records were maintained with the required minimum information. Evidence: Reviewed 5 children’s records and found the following: 1) Child 1 and 3 were missing documentation of the parents’ annual review of contact information. Child 1’s last review was dated 8/23/20 and Child 2’s last review was dated 4/6/20. 2) Child 1 was missing documentation of addresses for both emergency contacts.”
-
8VAC20-800-730-D
“Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that medications are kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: observed the provider and household member’s medications in the kitchen, on top of the refrigerator and in an unlocked cabinet next to the refrigerator.”
-
8VAC20-800-90-A
“Based on review, the provider did not ensure that before children may attend the family day home, they obtain documentation of being adequately immunized. Evidence: Reviewed 5 children’s records and found that Child 5 did not have documentation of an immunization record.”
All 11 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Nov 5, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Oct 28, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jun 11, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Nov 16, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Sep 27, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jul 11, 2023 | Inspection | 17 violations cited |
| May 12, 2023 | Inspection | 15 violations cited |
| Nov 14, 2022 | Inspection | 14 violations cited |
| Apr 8, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 8, 2022 | Inspection | 9 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: One Year license, expires Dec 7, 2026.
- Ages: Birth - 12 years 11 months.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 299 child care providers in Prince William County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 15.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Ms. Huma Farrukh This child care provider | 15 |
| Dale City Christian Church | 15 |
| Muriel Humphrey Child Care Center | 16 |
| Learning Paths Academy at Cardinal #16 | 17 |
| Ms. Sophia Fakhry | 24 |
| Heritage Baptist Church | 4 |
| Ms. Cynthia Johnson | 8 |
| KinderCare Learning Center #301616 | 2 |
| Ms. Abena Sakyi | 6 |
| Ms. Anjum Chohan | 10 |
| Ms. Rebecca Williams | 6 |
| Ms. Abida Naz | 7 |
| Ms. Edith Williams | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.