Sharon L. Hostler Child Development Center
A child day center in Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
107 Whitewood Road, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901. (434) 951-2060.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 7 deficiencies in the last three years
- Apr 222026 the latest visit on record
- 152 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
12 inspections on record, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.
7 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jun 17, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with the children and the documentation shall be signed by a physician, physician’s designee or an official of the local health department.
“The screening for Staff #7 was not signed by a physician, physician’s designee or an official of the local health department.”
-
The center shall ensure that areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, are maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“The front panel of a cabinet was missing the corner piece and had sharp edges”
Dec 17, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
The center must request a search of the central registry prior to the employee’s first day of employment.
“Staff #7, who had been employed for almost two months before the CPS was returned.”
Dec 12, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-4
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Based on review of documentation and interview, the center failed to complete out of state background checks for all staff who lived out of state within the past five years. Evidence: 1. Staff #2 indicated on the sworn disclosure that they had lived in Maine within the past five years. Staff #10 confirmed that there were no out of state background checks for Maine for Staff #2 on file. 2. Staff #10 confirmed that Staff #2 at lived in New Hampshire within the past five years. Staff #10 confirmed that there was no abuse and neglect registry check and no sex offender registry check for New Hampshire for Staff #2.”
-
22.1-289.036-A
“Based on review of documentation and interview, the center failed to repeat background checks for staff every five years. Evidence: 1. Staff #5?s criminal history background check was dated 05/14/2018. Staff #10 confirmed that the background check had not been repeated every five years.”
-
8VAC20-780-40-J
“Based on interview, the center failed to update the injury prevention procedures at least annually. Evidence: 1. Staff #11 confirmed that the injury prevention plan had not been updated at least annually.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on interview, the center failed to maintain a staff record with the required information. Evidence: 1. Staff #12 was observed in Infant A. Interview with Staff #1 confirmed that Staff #12 was being counted in ratio and there was no record available for Staff #12. 2. Staff #13 was observed in Preschool B. Interview with Staff #1 confirmed that Staff #13 was being counted in ratio and there was no record available for Staff #13.”
Jun 22, 2023: inspection8 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-150-B
“Based on review of records and interview, the center failed to ensure that immunization and physical examination records were signed by a physician, his designee or an official of a local health department. Evidence: 1. Child #2?s physical examination record did not contain a date or a physician’s signature. 2. Child #10?s immunization record and physical examination record did not contain a physician’s signature. 3. Staff #1 confirmed the records did not contain the required dates and signatures.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
The inspectors’ words, 129 words
“Based on observations and interview, the center failed to ensure that hazardous substances were kept in a locked place. Evidence: 1. In the Early Preschool A classroom, there was one bottle labelled ?sanitizer? and one bottle labeled ?soapy water? in an unlocked cabinet. Staff #4 confirmed that the hazardous materials were not in a locked place. 2. In the Early Preschool B classroom, there was one bottle labelled ?sanitizer? and one bottle labeled ?soapy water? in an unlocked cabinet. Staff #12 confirmed that the hazardous materials were not in a locked place. 3. In the Kindergarten Prep 1 classroom, there was one bottle of Eco Lab sanitizer and one bottle of Fabulose in an unlocked cabinet. Staff #13 confirmed that the hazardous materials were not in a locked place.”
-
8VAC20-780-320-B
“Based on observations and interview, the center failed to ensure that each restroom was equipped with toilet paper. Evidence 1. In the Toddler A/B restroom, there was no toilet paper. 2. In the Kindergarten Prep 2 classrooms, there was no toilet paper in the girl’s restroom. Staff #11 confirmed that there was no toilet paper in the girl’s restroom.”
-
8VAC20-780-400-B
The inspectors’ words, 116 words
“Based on interview, the center failed to ensure that behavioral guidance is constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and intended to redirect child to appropriate behavior. Evidence: 1. On June 16, 2023, Staff #1 reported to the department that Staff #14 ?did not follow our positive guidance policies?. 2. During interviews, Staff #4 stated that they witnessed Staff #14 ?forcefully made (Child #11) lay down?, put a blanket over her head and when Child #11 tried to pick up her head, Staff #14 pushed her head back down. Staff #4 also stated that Staff #14 put a blanket over Child #12?s head and when he picked up his head, Staff #14 pushed his head down.”
-
8VAC20-780-540-C
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure the first aid kit for the first floor contain the required items. Evidence: 1. The first aid kit on the first floor did not contain tweezers, triangular bandages or an instruction manual. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that the first aid kit did not contain tweezers, triangular bandages or an instruction manual.”
-
8VAC20-780-540-E
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to have one working, battery operated flashlight on each floor of the building and one working, battery operated radio in each building. Evidence: 1. There was not a working, battery operated flashlight or a working, battery operated radio available during the inspection. 2. Staff #2 confirmed that the center did not have a working, battery operated flashlight or a working, battery operated radio.”
-
8VAC20-780-560-G
The inspectors’ words, 122 words
“Based on observations and interview, the center failed to ensure that when food is brought from home, the container is clearly dated and labeled in a way that identifies the owner. Evidence: 1. In the Early Preschool B classroom, there was three water bottles without names or dates. Staff #12 confirmed that the water bottles and the contents were brought from home. 2. In the Kindergarten Prep 2 classroom, there was three water bottles without names or dates. Staff #11 confirmed that the water bottles and the contents were brought from home. 2. In the Kindergarten Prep 1 classroom, there was nine water bottles without names or dates. Staff #13 confirmed that the water bottles and the contents were brought from home.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Based on review of records and interview, the center failed to ensure that each child’s record contain the required information. Evidence: 1. Child #1?s record did not have a work phone number for either parent. 2. Child #2?s record did not have a work phone number for either parent. 3. Child #3?s record did not have a work phone number for either parent. 4. Child #4?s record did not have a work phone number for either parent. 5. Child #5?s record did not have a work phone number for one parent. 6. Child #6?s record did not have a work phone number for one parent. 7. Child #10?s record did not have a work phone number for either parent. 8. Staff #1 confirmed that the items were missing from the children’s records.”
Feb 16, 2023: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on review of ten staff records, the program did not ensure that all employees complete background checks every five years for one staff.
“Evidence: 1. The first day of employment for Staff #7 was 12/14/2014. The first central registry check in the record was dated 12/12/2014. The current central registry check in the record was dated 2/14/2020.”
-
Based on review of ten staff records, the program did not ensure that a criminal record check was completed prior to first day of employment for one staff.
“Evidence: 1. The first day of employment for Staff #3 was 5/31/2022. The criminal record check in the file was dated 6/1/2022.”
-
Based on review of ten staff records, the program failed to ensure that a criminal history record check from any state of residence in the preceding five years is completed prior to employment for one staff.
“Evidence: 1. The first day of employment for Staff # 10 was 1/23/2023. There was no out of state criminal history check in the file. 2. The administrator confirmed it had not been requested, and LI assisted in finding the contact information to request.”
-
Based on the review of ten child records, the program failed to ensure that immunization records where on file prior to first day of attendance for one child.
“Evidence: 1. The first day of attendance for Child #7 was 11/6/2022. The immunization record in the file was dated 1/5/2023.”
-
Based on a review of ten child records, the program failed to ensure that a physical was completed within 30 days after the first day of attendance for one child.
“Evidence: 1. The first day of attendance for Child #7 was 11/6/2022. The physical in the file was dated 1/5/2023.”
Mar 28, 2022: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, program did not ensure that a completed sworn statement or affirmation was completed prior to beginning of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The date of employment for Staff #1 was 5/10/21. The completed sworn statement in the file was dated 5/13/21. 2. The date of employment for Staff #3 was 6/7/21. The completed sworn statement in the file was dated 6/10/21. 3. The date of employment for Staff #5 was 7/12/21. The completed sworn statement in the file was dated 7/14/21.”
-
Based on record review, program did not ensure that results of a central registry check were in file within thirty days of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The date of employment for Staff #3 was 6/7/21. There are no results in the file. 2. The date of employment for Staff #6 was 1/18/22. There are no results in the file.”
-
Based on record review, program did not ensure that required orientation was completed no later than seven days of the date of assuming job responsibilities.
“Evidence: 1. The date of employment for Staff #3 was 6/7/21. Orientation was completed on 7/8/21. 2. The date of employment for Staff #6 was 1/18/22. Orientation was completed on 2/7/22.”
-
Based on staff interviews and review of administrative documents, the center did not ensure that the center’s activities, services, and facilities are maintained in compliance with these standards, the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by these standards, and the terms of the current license issued by the department.
The inspectors’ words, 310 words
“Evidence: 1. The center’s Positive Guidance Policy states: Bright Horizons implements positive guidance and does not ?discipline? or ?punish? children. Bright Horizons prohibits the following: ? Subjecting children to cruel, severe, or frightening punishment such as shaming, humiliation, threats, derogatory remarks, verbal or physical abuse, neglect, or abusive treatment including any forcible restraining, hitting, shaking, jerking, squeezing, spanking, yelling, and choking; ? Using bribes, threats, or false choices to guide behavior; 2. Interview with Staff A on 2/10/2022, revealed that on 2/8/2022, after Child 1 threw books, Staff B picked up child 1 by her shoulders, forcefully placed her on the ground, and slapped the right cheek of Child 1 several times saying ?We do not do that?. When Child 1 attempted to get up, Staff B placed her back on the ground and told her not to get up. 3. Interview with Staff A on 2/10/2022 indicated that after 3 pm on 2/8/2022, in the Toddler A classroom, Child 2 was washing his hands and struggling to turn off the water. Staff C raised her voice and asked Child 2 whether she needed him to get Staff B. Staff B stomped over to Child 2, picked him up by the shoulders, and forcefully placed him on the ground. Staff B then smacked Child 2 several times in the middle of his forehead. 4. Interview on 5/9/2022 with Staff D, the typical co teacher with Staff B, revealed that Staff D did not witness any of the incidents on 2/8/2022, but in the 5-6 months they’d worked together, she had never witnessed Staff B striking a child, but stated that on previous occasions, Staff C would threaten misbehaving children by asking them whether she should call Staff B over and that Staff B could be intimidating to the children by stomping towards them or raising voice when speaking to them.”
-
Based on staff interviews, the center did not ensure that behavioral guidance was constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts.
The inspectors’ words, 304 words
“Evidence: 1. Staff A stated during an interview on 2/10/2022 that during the early part of the day on 2/8/2022 in the Toddler B classroom, Child 1 did something to upset Staff B. When Child 1 noticed that Staff B was upset, the child flinched. Staff A questioned Staff B about the reaction, and Staff B stated, ?She knows I don’t play.? 2. Staff A stated during an interview on 2/10/2022, that approximately an hour after the first incident on 2/8/2022, Child 1 took some books from the bookshelf and threw them, upsetting Staff B. Staff B picked Child 1 up by her shoulders and forcefully placed her on the ground. Staff B then slapped the right cheek of Child 1 several times, while saying, ?We do not do that.? Child 1 attempted to get up while crying, but Staff B placed her back on the ground and told her not to get up. Staff A stated that Child 1?s cheek was much redder than normal after this. 3. Photographs taken on 2/9/22 by another agency showed the right cheek of Child 1 being redder than normal and redder than the other cheek. 4. Staff A stated during an interview on 2/10/2022 that after 3 pm on 2/8/2022, in the Toddler A classroom, Child 2 was washing his hands and struggling to turn off the water. Staff C raised her voice and asked Child 2 whether she needed him to get Staff B. Staff B, hearing this from the Toddler B classroom, stomped over to Child 2, picked him up by the shoulders, and forcefully placed him on the ground. Staff B then smacked Child 2 several times in the middle of his forehead. 5. Photographs taken on 2/9/2022 by another agency showed a bruise starting to form on the forehead of Child 2.”
-
Based on staff interviews and photographic evidence, the center did not ensure that staff does not engage in any form of forbidden actions.
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“Evidence: 1. Interview with Staff A on 2/10/2022 indicated that mid-morning on 2/8/2022 in the Toddler B classroom, Staff B picked Child 1 up by her shoulders and forcefully placed her on the ground. Staff B then slapped the right cheek of Child 1. Child 1 attempted to get up while crying, but Staff B placed her back on the ground and told her not to get up. Staff A stated that Child 1?s cheek was much redder than normal after this. 2. Interview with Staff A on 2/10/2022 indicated that after 3 pm on 2/8/2022, in the Toddler A classroom, Child 2 was washing his hands and struggling to turn off the water. Staff C raised her voice and asked Child 2 whether she needed him to get Staff B. Staff B stomped over to Child 2, picked him up by the shoulders, and forcefully placed him on the ground. Staff B then smacked Child 2 several times in the middle of his forehead. Photographs taken on 2/9/2022 by another agency showed the right cheek of Child 1 being redder than normal and redder than the other cheek and bruise starting to form on the forehead of Child 2.”
All 12 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 29, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Dec 17, 2024 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jul 10, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 8, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 12, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Aug 3, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 22, 2023 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Feb 16, 2023 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Mar 28, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Mar 28, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires May 17, 2028.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 152 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 1 complaint inspection on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 64 child care providers in Albemarle County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Congregation Beth Israel | 8 |
| Atlantic Coast Athletic Clubs of Virginia, LLC | 1 |
| Foundations Child Development Center | 29 |
| Ms. Mozhdeh Monjezi | 7 |
| Charlottesville Waldorf School | 27 |
| Charlottesville Catholic School | 2 |
| Daylily Preschool, LLC | 8 |
| Atlantic Coast Athletic Clubs of Virginia, LLC- Preschool | 14 |
| Sharon L. Hostler Child Development Center This child care provider | 7 |
| Ms. Sabrina Wilson | 34 |
| Olivet Presbyterian Church | 8 |
| Four Seasons Learning Center & Daycare, Inc. | 8 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.