Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk
A child day center in Suffolk, Virginia 23435
5805 Harbourview Boulevard, Suffolk, Virginia 23435. (757) 484-4902.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 10 deficiencies in the last three years
- Oct 72026 the latest visit on record
- 170 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
15 inspections on record, the latest on Oct 7, 2026.
10 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Oct 7, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
“A written care plan is required for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Child #10 has a diagnosed food allergy and did not have a written care plan in their file.”
Mar 3, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
The center is required to have an applicant or agent undergo a background checks every five years.
“The most recent criminal history search for applicant/agent #1 was overdue by approximately one year.”
Feb 23, 2024: inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.011-F
“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not always post the documents required by the Superintendent shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. Evidence: The Results (violation notice) for the last licensing inspection were not posted in the facility at the time of the inspection. The program director present at the time of the inspection confirmed that the results were not posted in a the facility.”
-
***REPEAT VIOLATION*** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
The inspectors’ words, 329 words
“Eight staff records were reviewed: The record for staff #2 whose date of employment is 2/8/2023 documented her residence in Massachusetts (MA) within the past 5 years. The record for staff #2 did not contain the results of a Sex Offender Search or the results of a Criminal History Search for the state of MA. The record for staff #3 whose date of employment was 1/11/2024 documented her residence in Florida (FL) within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect Registry or the results of a Sex Offender Registry Search for the state of FL. The record for staff #4 whose date of employment was 1/3/2024 documented her residence in Florida (FL) and North Carolina (NC). The record did not contain the results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect Registry or the results of a Sex Offender Registry Search for the state of FL and for the state of NC. The record for staff #6 whose date of employment was 12/4/2024 documented her residence in District of Columbia (DC), Delaware (DE), Maryland (MD), New Jersey (NJ) and Washington (WA). The record did not contain: the results of a Criminal History Search for DC; the results of a Criminal History Search for DE; the results of an Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for DE; the results of an Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for MD; the results of an Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for WA. The record for staff #7 whose date of employment was 9/26/2023 documented her residence in Florida (FL) within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect Registry or the results of a Sex Offender Registry Search for the state of FL. The Program Director in charge at the time of the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not present in the staff records at the time of the inspection.”
-
***REPEAT VIOLATION***’ Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee was unable to demonstrate that staff always complete orientation appropriate to the age of the children in care and including the required facility specific topics prior to the staff member working alone with children and no later than seven days of the date of assuming job responsibilities. Evidence: Eight staff records were reviewed. The records for staff #1(employed 1/2/2024), staff #3 (employed 1/11/2024), staff #4 (employed 1/3/2024) and staff # 6 (employed 12/4/2024) did not contain documentation to demonstrate that facility specific orientation training was completed.
“The program director present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not present in the staff records at the time of the inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
The inspectors’ words, 137 words
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did obtain a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Evidence: Ten children’s records were reviewed. The record for child #2 contained documentation that child #2 has a diagnosed allergy to avocado. Child #2’s record did not contain a care plan from child #2’s physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. The program director present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in child #2’s record at the time of inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“***REPEAT VIOLATION*** Based on a review of records the licensee did not always ensure that each staff record contained the required documentation to include documentation of two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency having been checked ore employment or volunteering. Evidence: Eight staff records were reviewed. The records for staff #1(employed 1/2/2024, staff #4 (employed 1/3/2024) and staff #7 (employed 9/26/2023) did not contain documentation to demonstrate that any reference checks as to the character, reputation and competency of the candidate had been checked prior to their employment or thereafter.”
Nov 28, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
***REPEAT*** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain, for every applicable employee, a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
The inspectors’ words, 166 words
“Evidence: Ten staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #1, whose date of hire was documented as 9/27/2023, contained a Sworn Disclosure Statement which indicated that employee #1 resided in the state of New York within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for the state of New York within 45 days of employment in the Child Day Center. The administrator present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in the record for staff #1. The record for staff #7, whose date of hire was documented as 9/25/2023, contained a Sworn Disclosure Statement which indicated that employee #7 resided in the state of Texas within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Criminal Record Search for the state of Texas prior to employment in the Child Day Center. The administrator present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in the record for staff #7.”
-
Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always maintain documentation that demonstrated that orientation training was completed prior to working alone with children and no later than 7 days after the date of assuming job responsibilities.
“Evidence: Nine staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4, whose date of employment was documented as 11/6/23, did not contain documentation that orientation training had been completed. The administrator on site during the inspection was not able to locate this documentation during the inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that a record containing all required documentation is maintained for each staff member. Evidence: Nine staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4 did not contain documentation that two references were checked for staff #4 prior to employment. The administrator on site during the inspection was not able to locate this documentation during the inspection.”
Jun 13, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on staff records and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record check and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: In Staff#3’s record (date of hire: 09/01/22) there was no results of a central registry finding for the state of GA. In Staff#4’s record (date of hire: 08/23/21) there was no results of a criminal and central registry findings for the state of TX. Interview with staff confirmed the out of state results were not available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the center did not ensure all areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside are maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition.
“Evidence: In Children’s House 3-6 bathroom, the toilet would not flush. Interview with staff confirmed the toilet not working properly.”
Apr 21, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that results of a search of the central registry are obtained for each employee within 30 days of employment.
“Evidence: Seven staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #6 documented the start of employment as 9/1/2022. The central registry findings were dated 12/12/2022. Documentation shows that a second request was sent on 11/16/2022, which is 76 days after the employee began employment.”
Jul 8, 2022: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-420-A
The inspectors’ words, 240 words
“Based on a review of written procedures and interviews, the program does not provide all of the required written procedures to parents before the child’s first day of attending. Evidence: 1. The written policies included in the current parent handbook do state that the custodial parent has a right to be admitted to the center, as required by the Code of Virginia 22.1-289.054. 2. The parent handbook states throughout , in several areas “Let your child walk independently into school carrying own belongings.” ; “Students will be walked into the school building by staff members during drop off time.” ; “Pull up to the drop off entrance of the building and please remain in your vehicle.” ; and for late arriving students “ring the front doorbell; student will be escorted to class by office personnel”. 3. The parent handbook states that Class room observations, using viewing windows, by reservation, are encouraged. However, it is noted that no observations will be scheduled during the month of September or “until children are settled into a routine and anxieties are dispelled”. In addition, it states that “due to Covid-19 restrictions we will not have casual observations until further notice.” 4. Interviews with the Program Director revealed that parents are not normally permitted in the classrooms without prior arrangement and are discouraged from entering the facility unless an appointment is made in advance to observe from the viewing window or to meet with staff.”
-
8VAC20-780-420-C
“Interviews with the parent of a two year old child and with the Program Director revealed that a parent requested to walk her two-year-old child to her classroom on the first day of summer camp (6/27/2022) but was not permitted to enter the facility to do so.”
Mar 1, 2022: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on a review pf documentation and interview, the licensee was unable to demonstrate that an Out of State Sex Offender Registry and an Out of State Criminal History Name Check were obtained for each state, other than Virginia, that any individual employee has resided in the past 5 years, prior to their 1st day of employment/service at the center.
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Evidence:Four staff records were reviewed at the time of inspection on 3/1/2022. The record for staff #1 contained a Sworn Disclosure statement that indicated that staff #1 resided in Texas within 5 years of employment at the program. There were no results in the record for a Sex offender Registry search for the state of Texas. There were no results in the record for a Criminal Record Check for the state of Texas. The program director confirmed that these background checks had not been completed. Staff #1 was working in the center at the time of the inspection.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the center is not equipped with at least one Carbon Monoxide detector.
“Evidence: A carbon monoxide detecter was not observed in the center during the inspection on 3/1/2022. The Program Director stated that the center was built before 2015 and she confirmed that a carbon monoxide detector was not installed in the building.”
-
Based on a review of documentation and interview, the program was not able to demonstrate that results of a search of the central registry had been obtained for the applicant.
“Evidence: The application received by the department for Renewal of the program’s license listed applicant #1 as a designated applicant / licensee / registrant. However, at the inspection conducted on 3/1/2022, the program director confirmed that she was unable to locate documentation of the results of a Search of the Central Registry for Applicant #1 and was also unable to obtain this documentation from the licensee.”
-
Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee was not able to demonstrate that a fire inspection had been conducted within the past 12 months.
“Evidence: The most recent fire inspection available for review at the time of the inspection on 3/1/2022 was dated 8/25/2020. The program director confirmed that she did not have documentation of a more recent inspection having been conducted.”
All 15 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 3, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 19, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 27, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 31, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 31, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| May 3, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| May 3, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 23, 2024 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 13, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Apr 21, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jul 8, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 1, 2022 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Mar 2, 2028.
- Ages: 1 year 4 months - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 170 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 4 complaint inspections on record.
- 2 complaint allegations published with Virginia’s findings, 2 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2022 | Complaint | Allegation: Activities. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | Complaint | Allegation: Admissions/Dicharge. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 53 child care providers in the City of Suffolk, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 10.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Little Grove Baptist Church | 2 |
| Children’s Harbor - Suffolk | 43 |
| Mrs. Antionette Dixon | 5 |
| Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk This child care provider | 10 |
| The Nansemond-Suffolk Academy Association, Incorporated | 2 |
| Believers Church | 3 |
| Ms. Bianca Bland | 23 |
| Ms. Vontricia Farrell | 9 |
| AlphaBEST Education, Inc. - Creekside Elementary | 13 |
| AlphaBEST Education, Inc. - Florence Bowser Elementary | 27 |
| AlphaBEST Education, Inc.-Northern Shores Elementary | 15 |
| Dana Smith-Washington | 44 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.