Montessori Academy of Virginia - Chesapeake
A child day center in Chesapeake, Virginia 23320
1468 Kempsville Road, Chesapeake, Virginia 23320. (757) 436-3995.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 9 deficiencies in the last three years
- May 292026 the latest visit on record
- 140 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 inspections on record, the latest on May 29, 2026.
9 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Sep 23, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“REPEAT VIOLATION Hazardous substances such as cleaning materials shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. A bottle of shaving cream was in an unlocked cabinet in the toddler classroom and a canister of sanitizing wipes and a plug in air freshener were in an unlocked cabinet in the three to five year old classroom. All items has the keep out if reach of children label.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Documentation of at least two references to character, reputation, and competency are to be checked prior to employment. Staff #1 only had no documentation of reference verifications on file.”
Jan 14, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Hazardous substances such as cleaning materials shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Three packs of wax melts with the warning labels, ?Keep out of reach of children,? were unlocked in a cabinet in the 2-3 year old classroom.”
-
8VAC20-780-440-E
“There shall be at least 12 inches of space between occupied cots, beds, and rest mats. Four occupied cots were less than 12 inches apart in the 2-3 year old classroom.”
Jul 26, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-130-A
“Based on record review and interview, the center did not ensure that documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health was obtained before attending the center. Evidence: 1. The record for child #1 (enrolled in 2022) and present on the day of the inspection, did not contain documentation of immunizations. 2. Staff #1, the director confirmed that the child was in attendance and that the documentation for immunization was not in the record for child #1.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“REPEAT VIOLATION Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center did not ensure that hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1. In the two and three year old classroom, there was a can of air freshener spay and a canister of sanitizing wipes both containing a ?keep out of reach of children? label stored on a counter and accessible to children. 2. Staff #1 (Director) confirmed that the hazardous substances were not locked and accessible to children.”
May 24, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-270-A
The inspectors’ words, 172 words
“Based on observation, interview and tour it was determined that the center did not ensure that areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a safe condition. Evidence: 1. At the entrance to the playground, there are approximately 12 rubber floor mats measuring two feet by two feet. Some of the mat’s edges were not connected which created a space that exposed the ground creating a tripping hazard. 2. The outdoor playground has several large metal bolts along the perimeter of the area that are approximately an inch and a half in diameter that were protruding out of the ground posing as a tripping and snagging hazard. 3. The astroturf that is covering the cement ground has a non-visible dip approximately three feet in diameter creating a tripping hazard. 4. A plastic ground barrier that surrounds a tree has broken edges creating a pinch point for children’s fingers. 5. Staff #1 (Director) confirmed that the hazards were present in the outdoor area that created an unsafe environment.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center did not ensure that Hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1. The cabinet under the sink where children wash hands in the 2 and 3 year old classroom was unlocked and contained approximately 10 spray cans of disinfectant spray, with a ?keep out of reach? label and were accessible to children. 2. Staff #1 (Director) confirmed that the hazardous substances were not locked using a safe locking method that prevented access by children.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-P
The inspectors’ words, 136 words
“Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the center did not ensure that they maintain a written record of children’s serious and minor injuries in which entries are made the day of occurrence to include the date and time of injury, location in the center of where injury occurred and documentation of how the parent was notified. Evidence: 1. 12 of the 29 injury reports reviewed for April of 2024 did not document how the parents were notified. 2. 1 of the 29 injury reports reviewed for April of 2024 did not document the date of the injury. 3. 1 of the 29 injury reports reviewed for April of 2024 did not document where the injury occurred. 4. Staff #1 (Director) confirmed that the above information was not documented on the injury reports.”
Oct 24, 2023: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on interviews, the center failed to ensure that staff shall interact with the child to provide needed help, comfort and support in order to promote the child’s physical, emotional, and social well-being and growth.
The inspectors’ words, 362 words
“Evidence: Center staff failed to provide needed help, comfort and support to child 1 during the following incident: 1. On 9/19/23, child 1 (age 3 years) had a toileting accident while using the bathroom in the pre-k classroom. Child 1, who had gotten feces on her body and clothing, was left in a dimly lit bathroom with the door mostly closed by center staff for a period of at least 30 minutes until her mother arrived to clean and change her. a. Staff 1, the pre-k teacher working in the classroom on 9/19/23, and staff 2, center director, acknowledged that they did not provide any needed help or support to child 1 in washing her hands, cleaning feces off her body or changing into clean clothes after she had a toileting accident. Staff 1 stated that she could not go into the bathroom to help child 1, that she was busy with the other children in the classroom and stated “I am not required to help her wipe with poop accidents.” Staff 2 stated it is school policy that staff do not help wipe children in the pre-k class if there is a toileting accident and do not assist in changing the child if their clothing becomes soiled, as they are supposed to be fully toilet-trained. She stated that if a child has a toileting accident they will call the parents or the emergency contact to come to the center and assist the child. c. Child 1’s mother stated when she arrived at the center on 9/19/23 her child was naked in the bathroom with the door closed and there was dried feces on her legs, vagina, buttocks and clothing, as well as the floor and wall. She stated the bathroom was “very dim”, the light was flickering, and was only furnished with toilet paper and a step stool. Child 1’s mother stated she used half a pack of wipes she brought with her from home to clean the feces off her child and brought clean clothes for her to wear. She stated that even though her child had a change of clothing at the center, they were not put on her.”
-
Based on interviews, the center failed to ensure that children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water after toileting and any contact with feces.
The inspectors’ words, 253 words
“Evidence: 1. On 9/19/23, child 1 (age 3 years) had a toileting accident while in the bathroom of the pre-k classroom. Child 1, who had feces on her hands was left in the bathroom by center staff for at least 30 minutes until her mother arrived to clean her. Child 1 was not allowed to come out of the bathroom to wash her hands nor was she given any wipes or wet paper towels to do so. a. Child 1’s mother stated that on 9/19/23 she received a phone call from the center at approximately 2:30pm that her child had a toileting accident and that she needed to come to the center to assist her daughter. Child 1’s mother stated she arrived at the center at around 3:00pm and her child was in the bathroom with feces on her hands and there was no sink in the bathroom for her to do so. b. Staff 1, who was the pre-k teacher working in the classroom on 9/19/23, and staff 2, center director, were aware that child 1 had a toileting accident and had feces on her hands. Both acknowledged that there is no sink in the bathroom and that they did not provide child 1 with any wipes or wet paper towels to clean her hands. c. The licensing inspector observed the bathroom in the pre-k classroom to have no sink or soap. The sink that children use to wash their hands after toileting is located outside of the bathroom in the classroom.”
-
Based on interview, the center failed to ensure that when a child’s clothing becomes wet or soiled, that child shall be cleaned and changed immediately.
The inspectors’ words, 240 words
“Evidence: On 9/19/23, child 1 (age 3 years) had a toileting accident while in the bathroom of the pre-k classroom. Child 1, who had feces on her clothing, was left in the bathroom by center staff for at least 30 minutes without changing her soiled clothing until her mother arrived to change her. a. Child 1’s mother stated that on 9/19/23 she received a phone call from the center that her child had gotten feces on her clothing during a toileting accident and she needed to come to the center to assist her daughter. Child 1’s mother stated when she arrived to the center her child was in the bathroom with no clothes on except for her socks. Child 1’s mother stated that her clothing was covered in feces and tied up in a plastic bag hanging on the bathroom door. She stated that there was an extra change of clothing in the classroom for child 1 but they were not given to her to put on. b. Staff 1, the pre-k teacher working in the classroom on 9/19/23, and staff 2, center director, were aware that child 1 had gotten feces on her clothing while in the bathroom and had taken her clothes off. Both staff acknowledged that child 1 was told to wait in the bathroom for her mother and that she could not put on her clean change of clothes because she had feces on her body.”
Jun 22, 2022: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not ensure that each child shall have a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician before the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: 1. The record for child 1 (date of enrollment: 8/31/20) does not contain documentation of a physical examination. 2. The center director confirmed that the record for child 1 is lacking documentation of a physical examination.”
-
Based on a review of the mot recent fire inspection and interview, it was determined the center could not provide the licensing representative an annual fire inspection report from the appropriate fire official having jurisdiction.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent fire inspection for the center is dated 3/16/20. 2. The center director confirmed that the fire inspection is expired.”
-
Based on a review of the most recent health inspection and interview, the center did not ensure that annual approval from the health department is provided.
“Evidence: 1. Documentation of the most recent health inspection is dated 11/19/20. 2. The center director confirmed that the health inspection is expired.”
All 9 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| May 29, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 23, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 23, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jan 14, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 26, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| May 24, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Oct 24, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jun 22, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Jul 4, 2028.
- Ages: 1 year 4 months - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 140 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 3 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 121 child care providers in the City of Chesapeake, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 13; this one had 9.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Greenbrier KinderCare | 27 |
| La Petite Academy #7134 | 26 |
| Greenbrier Christian Academy | 5 |
| Great Bridge Preschool | 17 |
| Tidewater Community Church | Not given |
| The YMCA of South Hampton Roads-Crestwood Elementary School | 23 |
| YMCA School Age Child Care-Greenbrier Primary School | 35 |
| YMCA School Age Child Care-Greenbrier Intermediate School | 20 |
| The YMCA Of South Hampton Roads-B. M. Williams | 32 |
| THE YMCA OF SOUTH HAMPTON ROADS ? GEORGETOWN PRIMARY | 12 |
| Montessori Academy of Virginia - Chesapeake This child care provider | 9 |
| Right Start Early Childhood Center | 32 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.