The YMCA of South Hampton Roads-Crestwood Elementary School
A child day center in Chesapeake, Virginia 23320
1420 Great Bridge Boulevard, Chesapeake, Virginia 23320. (757) 297-6144.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 23 deficiencies in the last three years
- Mar 192026 the latest visit on record
- 76 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 inspections on record, the latest on Mar 19, 2026.
23 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
23 deficiencies in 5 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Mar 19, 2026: inspection7 deficiencies
-
The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Staff #5, did not have documentation of requesting a criminal history check or a central registry check from the state they had lived in the preceding five years. Staff #6, present during this inspection, did not have documentation of requesting a central registry check from the state they had lived in the preceding five years.”
-
Children under 10 years of age shall always be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“During the inspection, there were no staff consistently in the corridor where the children were using the restrooms. These children were intermittently unsupervised for approximately 5-8 minutes.”
-
8VAC20-780-350-B-5
“The required ratio for children ages school age eligible up to 9 years is one staff per eighteen children. Staff #3 was observed supervising thirty children for approximately 5-10 minutes.”
-
The center shall maintain a written record of children’s serious and minor injuries in which entries are made the day of occurrence. The record shall include all of the required information.
“The injury report dated 3.3.26 for child #8 only contained one of the two required signatures. The injury report dated 3.9.26 did not contain the time, date, or method of parental notification.”
-
No child shall be allowed to drink or eat while walking around.
“Child #6 and #7 were observed walking around the cafeteria eating and drinking during snack time.”
-
Staff shall have current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children in care.
“Staff #2, #3, and #6 did not have documentation of certification in CPR.”
-
Staff shall have current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care.
“Current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care.”
Oct 20, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
The center must request a search of the central registry prior to the employee’s first day of employment.
“Staff #5, who was working during this inspection, did not have a central registry search requested.”
-
The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Staff #5, present during this inspection, did not have documentation of requesting a central registry check from the state they had lived in the preceding five years.”
-
Staff are to complete the VDOE sponsored online orientation course within 90 days of hire.
“Staff #6 had no documentation of completing the course and had been employed for over two years.”
-
The center shall have a written emergency preparedness plan that addresses staff responsibility and facility readiness with respect to emergency evacuation and relocation, shelter-in-place, and lockdown.
“The emergency preparedness plan that was on site was not up to date, it was dated August 2024 and contained information that was no longer correct.”
-
Staff records kept for each staff person shall contain all of the required documentation.
“The records for staff #4 and #5 did not have date of hire. The record for staff #5 did not have verification of identity.”
Feb 10, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
During the stated hours of operation, there always shall be on the premises when one or more children are present one staff member who meets the qualifications of a program leader or program director and an immediately available staff member.
“At time of inspector’s arrival there were 25 children in care alone with staff #1. Staff #1 stated that staff #2 was in the restroom. Staff # 2 had not returned at the conclusion of this inspection, which was 45 minutes in duration.”
-
When children are in ongoing mixed age groups, the staff-to-children ratio and group size applicable to the youngest child in the group shall apply to the entire group.
“Staff #2 was observed supervising 25 children (youngest child 8 years old) from approximately 3:35 - 4:20 pm.”
Oct 16, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
The center shall obtain documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center.
“Child #1, who had been attending for six weeks, did not have documentation of an immunization record on file.”
-
The center is required to inform all staff who work with children of children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions.
“There were three children with documented food allergies enrolled, staff was only aware of one of the three children having food allergies.”
-
The center is required to keep a current list of all known allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions in each room or area where children are present. The list must be dated and kept confidential.
“There were three children with allergies enrolled, there was no list in the after school care area.”
-
A written care plan is required for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.
“Child #3, who has been enrolled for six weeks, has a diagnosed food allergy and did not have a written care plan in their file.”
Mar 27, 2024: inspection5 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-200-A
“REPEAT VIOLATION Based on observation and interview it was determined the center does not have a qualified program director or a qualified back-up program director who meets one of the director qualifications who shall regularly be on site at least 50% of the center’s hours of operation. Evidence: 1. The staff onsite at this staff do not meet the qualifications of Program Director. 2. Staff reported the Program Director is not on site 50 % of the center’s operation.”
-
8VAC20-780-270-A
“Based on observation it was determined the center did not ensure all areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, were maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition. Evidence: 1. There was a mop bucket with approximately 6” of water in the cafeteria where the children were in care.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Based on observation it was determined the center did not ensure that all hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides were in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1. Sanitizing agents were unlocked in the First Aid bag during this inspection. 2. Staff confirmed that these were unlocked during the inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-510-L
“Based on observation and interview it was determined the center did not ensure all medication was kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1. There was an epi pen in the unlocked first aid bag accessible to children in care. 2. Staff confirmed that this bag was unlocked during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“REPEAT VIOLATION Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that the record for each child with a diagnosed food allergy contained a written care plan, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Evidence: 1. The record for child #6, both with documented food allergies, did not contain a written care plan. 2. The staff confirmed that there was not written care plan in the record for these children.”
Sep 14, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-200-A
“Based on observation and interview it was determined the center does not have a qualified program director or a qualified back-up program director who meets one of the director qualifications who shall regularly be on site at least 50% of the center’s hours of operation. Evidence: 1. The staff onsite at this staff do not meet the qualifications of Program Director. 2. Staff reported the Program Director is not on site 50 % of the center’s operation.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that the record for each child contained all of the required documentation. Evidence: 1. The record for child #1 did not contain documentation of verification of child’s identity and age. 2. Staff confirmed that this information was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that the record for each child with a diagnosed food allergy contained a written care plan, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Evidence: 1. The record for child #6 and #7, both with documented food allergies, did not contain a written care plan. 2. The staff confirmed that there was not written care plan in the record for these children.”
Apr 5, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Based on observation an interview it was determined the center did not ensure that all hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1. There was a spray bottle of Purell Sanitizing spray on a cart in the cafeteria where children were present. 2. Staff confirmed the Purell was accessible to children in care during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-40-M
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not maintain a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions documented in the allergy plan required in 8VAC20-780-60 A 8. This list is to be accessible to all staff who work with children, dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present. Evidence: 1. Staff #1 reported that two children(# 6 and #7) in care have food allergies but they do not have written list of this. 2. The records for child #6 and #7 contained documentation of peanut allergies but there was no list for staff at the center.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on record review it was determined the center did not ensure that the record for each child enrolled contained all of the required information. Evidence: 1. The record for child #1 did not contain a home phone number for their mother and a work phone number for their father. 2. The record for child #4 did not contain a home phone number for their mother. 3. Staff confirmed child #1 and #4 were in care during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
The inspectors’ words, 103 words
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure they had a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Evidence: 1. Staff #1 reported that two children(# 6 and #7) in care have food allergies but they do not have written care plans. 2. The records for child #6 and #7 contained documentation of peanut allergies but did not contain written care plans.”
Feb 1, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-790-600-D-1
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that all staff had current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children in care. within 90 days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2(hired 2/17/22) did not contain documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification, as appropriate to the age of the children in care within 90 days of employment. 2. Staff confirmed this was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-790-600-D-2
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that all staff had current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care. within 90 days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2(hired 2/17/22) did not contain documentation of first aid certification, as appropriate to the age of the children in care within 90 days of employment. 2. Staff confirmed this was not available during this inspection.”
Feb 1, 2023: inspection8 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-130-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not obtain documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center. Evidence: 1. The record for child #3 did not contain immunization documentation. 2. Staff confirmed this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-140-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each child had a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician. Evidence: 1. The record for child #3 did not contain physical examination documentation. 2. Staff confirmed this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-160-C
“Based on record review and interview it was determined that the center did not ensure that all staff obtain and submit the results of a follow-up tuberculosis screening as stated in subsection B of this section at least every two years from the date of the first initial screening or testing. Evidence: 1. There was no updated TB screening in the record for staff #1. 2. Staff confirmed that this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-200-A
“Based on observation and interview it was determined the center does not have a qualified program director or a qualified back-up program director who meets one of the director qualifications who shall regularly be on site at least 50% of the center’s hours of operation. Evidence: 1. The staff onsite at this staff do not meet the qualifications of Program Director. 2. Staff reported the Program Director is not on site 50 % of the center’s operation.”
-
8VAC20-780-240-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each staff member completed the Virginia Department of Education-sponsored orientation course within 90 calendar days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2 (hired 2/17/22) did not contain documentation of completion of the Virginia Department of Education-sponsored orientation course. 2. Staff confirmed this documentation as not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-400-A
The inspectors’ words, 357 words
“Based on observation and interview it was determined all staff at the center did not interact with all of the children in care in a manner that provided help, comfort, and support. Evidence: 1. Shortly after children arrived to the program Staff #1 was observed telling a group of children to put their backpacks on the table. In the presence of the entire group of children in care staff #1 said ?I don’t know what it’s going to take for y?all to get it, everyone else has?. A few minutes later staff #1 was observed standing in front of a group of approximately 3-4 boys seated at a cafeteria table. Staff #1 was speaking in a raised, stern, voice tone that could be heard across the cafeteria by all the children in care. Staff #1 told the group of boys they were not allowed to go to the gym because they did not put their backpacks on the table. The other children in care had stopped their activities and were watching/listening to the interaction. The 3 children involved were visibly upset and tearful. 2. After staff #1 left the cafeteria child #5 asked to speak to this inspector and explained that staff #1 “is always rude with us and tries to get us in trouble every day”. He stated that child #6 was crying because they were not able to go to the gym and staff #1 told him to ?stop crying?. 3. Child #4 reported that staff #1 ?snatched his Chromebook? from him. 4. Child #6 reported that he feels like staff #1 ?picks on him and tries to make him mad so he will get in trouble?. Child #6 further reported that when staff #1 was talking to them at the table before they left the cafeteria, they asked child #6 “are you smart?” when child #6 responded “yes, I am” then staff #1 said “if you were smart you would stop hanging out with child #4, #5, and #7”. Two of the children were crying when sharing this information with this inspector. 5. Staff confirmed that staff #1 provokes this group of children daily.”
-
8VAC20-780-560-F
“Based on observation it was determined the center did not ensure that a one week menu of foods served is posted. Evidence: 1. There was no menu posted during this inspection. 2. Staff confirmed the menu was not posted.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each child enrolled had a record at the center that contained the required documentation. Evidence: 1. At the time of record review there was no record available for child #3(enrolled 9/6/22). 2. Staff confirmed that they did not have access to parent contact or any other information for child #3 during this inspection.”
Oct 12, 2022: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-790-600-D-1
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that all staff who work directly with children have within 90 days of the date of employment current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation appropriate to the ages of children in care. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2 (hired 2/17/22) did not contain certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 2. Staff confirmed that this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-790-600-D-2
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that all staff who work directly with children have within 90 days of the date of employment current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2 (hired 2/17/22) did not contain certification in first aid. 2. Staff confirmed that this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-790-600-F
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that all staff who work directly with children, in addition to preservice and orientation training required in subsections A through D of this section, annually attend at least 16 hours of training and staff development activities, to include the department’s health and safety update course. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #1 (hired 12/12/2018) did not contain documentation of completing the department’s annual health and safety update. 2. Staff confirmed that this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
Oct 12, 2022: inspection8 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-130-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not obtain documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center. Evidence: 1. The record for child #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 did not contain immunization documentation. 2. Staff confirmed this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-140-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each child had a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician. Evidence: Evidence: 1. The record for child #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 did not contain physical examination documentation. 2. Staff confirmed this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-160-A
“Based on record review it was determined the center did not ensure that each staff member and individual from an independent contractor shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening prior to employment dated no more than 30 days before date of emplyment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2 (hired 2/17/22) did not contain documentation of TB screening. 2. Staff confirmed that this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-240-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each staff member completed the Virginia Department of Education-sponsored orientation course within 90 calendar days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2 (hired 2/17/22) did not contain documentation of completion of the Virginia Department of Education-sponsored orientation course. 2. Staff confirmed this documentation as not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-340-F
“Based on observation it was determined that the center did not ensure children are always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff, except that staff need only be able to hear a child who is using the restroom. Evidence: Inspector observed two children in the hallway walking from the gym to the cafeteria unsupervised and then from the cafeteria to the gym. The children confirmed that they were in the YMCA program when asked by this inspector.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on record review it was determined the center did not ensure that there was a separate record for each child enrolled which contained all of the required information. Evidence: 1. There was no record for child #4 at the site. 2. The records for child #1, #2, #3, and #5 did not contain the first date of attendance and proof of identification and age. 3. Staff confirmed these record were not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each staff record contained all of the required documentation. Evidence: 1. The records for staff #1 and #2 did not contain documentation of the qualifications for their positions. 2. Staff confirmed this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-90-A
“Based on record review it was determined the center did not have the required signed parental agreements between the parent and the center in each child’s record by the first day of the child’s attendance. Evidence: 1. The records for child #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 did not contain the required signed parental agreements. 2. Staff confirmed these record were not available during this inspection.”
Jan 20, 2022: inspection4 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-2
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each staff member submitted to fingerprinting as required. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #1 did not contain documentation of fingerprinting. 2. Staff confirmed that the documentation was not available during the inspection.”
-
8VAC20-770-60-C-2
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each staff member had a central registry finding within 30 days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #1 did not contain documentation of a central registry finding. 2. Staff confirmed that this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-160-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure staff submitted documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening within the required timeframe. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2(hired 9/27/21) did not contain documentation of a TB screening. 2. The record for staff #3(hired 11/4/21) did not contain documentation of a TB screening. 3. Staff confirmed that this documentation was not available during this inspection.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on record review and interview it was determined the center did not ensure that each child enrolled has all of the required components in their record: Evidence: 1. The record for child #2 (first date of attendance 9/7/21) did not contain: -Name, address, phone number, place of employment and, work phone number for parent(s) -Name, address, and phone number for the two required emergency contacts -Name(s) of school or program previously attended or concurrently attending 2. Staff confirmed that this information was not available during the inspection.”
All 18 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Oct 20, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Oct 20, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 10, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 10, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Oct 16, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 16, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Mar 27, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 27, 2024 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Sep 14, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 14, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Apr 5, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Feb 1, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Feb 1, 2023 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Oct 12, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Oct 12, 2022 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Jan 20, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 20, 2022 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Sep 13, 2027.
- Program Located in a Public School.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 4 years - 12 years.
- Capacity: 76 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 121 child care providers in the City of Chesapeake, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 13; this one had 23.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Greenbrier KinderCare | 27 |
| La Petite Academy #7134 | 26 |
| Greenbrier Christian Academy | 5 |
| Great Bridge Preschool | 17 |
| Tidewater Community Church | Not given |
| The YMCA of South Hampton Roads-Crestwood Elementary School This child care provider | 23 |
| YMCA School Age Child Care-Greenbrier Primary School | 35 |
| YMCA School Age Child Care-Greenbrier Intermediate School | 20 |
| The YMCA Of South Hampton Roads-B. M. Williams | 32 |
| THE YMCA OF SOUTH HAMPTON ROADS ? GEORGETOWN PRIMARY | 12 |
| Montessori Academy of Virginia - Chesapeake | 9 |
| Right Start Early Childhood Center | 32 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.