Bright Beginnings, Inc. - Forest Lakes
A child day center in Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
1610 Regent Street, Charlottesville, Virginia 22911. (434) 973-8414.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 20 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 32026 the latest visit on record
- 120 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
29 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 3, 2026.
20 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
20 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
Aug 3, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.011-F
“The license and any other documents required by the Superintendent shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. A license that expired four months ago was the only license posted.”
-
8VAC20-780-160-A
“Each staff member and individual from an independent contractor shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening. The documentation shall have been completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment and be signed by a physician, physician’s designee, or an official of the local health department. The TB screening for staff #4 was completed four months prior to the date of employment.”
-
8VAC20-780-270-A
“Areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition. A foam couch in the Elephant room was torn on two corners exposing the foam underneath.”
-
8VAC20-780-40-M
“The center shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions documented in the allergy plan. The list posted in the classrooms was not current and had children that are no longer at the center posted, a new child not posted, and a child listed in the wrong room.”
-
8VAC20-780-570-E
“Prepared infant formula shall be refrigerated, dated and labeled with the child’s name. Three bottles in the Monkey room were not labeled.”
Sep 11, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-780-560-G
“When food is brought from home, the food container shall be labeled in a way that identifies the owner. Seven out of eight lunch boxes in the Elephant room were not labeled.”
Apr 15, 2025: inspection3 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-500-A
“Staff shall wash hands with soap and running water after any contact with body fluids. Staff #3 did not wash hands after wiping mucus from a child’s nose and the staff’s arm.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-F
“Lockdown procedures shall be practiced at least annually. There was no lockdown procedure practiced in 2024. The most recent lockdown practiced was dated 9/13/23.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Each center shall maintain and keep at the center a separate record for each child enrolled that contains all of the required information. The record for child #3, enrolled for over two weeks, was missing the work phone number of each parent who has custody and the previous child day care attended by the child.”
Sep 19, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-130-E
“The center shall obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years. Child #1, who is under the age of 2 and had been attending for 11 months, did not have documentation of immunizations every 6 months.”
-
8VAC20-780-270-A
“The center shall ensure that areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, are maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition. There was chipped and peeling paint in several areas on the wall to the right when you walk into the zebra room. There was a hole, big enough for fingers to fit in, on the wall with the sink in the zebra room.”
Feb 27, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-780-370-1
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure when an infant is placed in his crib, he shall be placed on his back (supine). Evidence: Infant #1 (age 6 weeks) was observed to be placed in the crib on the infant’s left side to sleep. Administration acknowledged the infant was placed on his side, and not on his back (supine).”
Nov 28, 2023: inspection8 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-160-A
“Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that a staff member submitted documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #2, hired on 05/15/2023, did not contain documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening.”
-
8VAC20-780-160-C
“Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that at least every two years from the date of the initial screening or testing, staff members obtained and submitted the results of a follow-up tuberculosis screening. Evidence: 1.The record for staff #3 contained TB results dated 05/10/2021. The follow-up screening was not obtained until 09/04/2023.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
The inspectors’ words, 179 words
“Repeat Violation Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that hazardous substances, such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1. The door to the cabinet above the sink in the Tiger room was open and unlocked. The cabinet contained a bottle of Comet Classic Foam Cleaner with Bleach, a spray bottle labeled ?Bleach Water? dated 11/27, and a spray bottle labeled ?Table Bleach? dated 11/17. Staff working in the Tiger room verified that both spray bottles contained a bleach mixture. 2. There is not a lock on the door to the kitchen, located in the main hallway. A cabinet under a sink, which did not have a locking method, contained a spray bottle of Simple Green and a bottle of Proface ready to Use Heavy Duty Degreaser, both labels indicated ?Keep Out of Reach of Children?. The kitchen also contained unlocked bottle of Dawn Ultra, label indicating ?Keep Out of Reach of Children? and a spray bottle labeled Antibacterial Cleaner.”
-
8VAC20-780-340-A
The inspectors’ words, 145 words
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure when staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance. Evidence: 1. In the lion’s infant room, two children were observed sleeping in bouncy chairs. Child #6 was observed asleep with a blanket covering him up to his chin and a stuffed animal resting against his face. Another child was observed sleeping with a bib attached around his neck. 2. According to The American Academy of Pediatrics website “infants need to sleep on their backs on a firm, flat non-inclined surface without soft bedding. Keep soft objects, such as pillow-like toys, quilts, comforters, and loose bedding, such as blankets away from the infant’s sleep area to reduce the risk of SIDS and suffocation.” 3. Administration confirmed the babies should not have had a blanket, stuffed animal, or bib on while sleeping.”
-
8VAC20-780-350-Q
The inspectors’ words, 108 words
“Based on documentation and interview, the center failed to ensure that written assessments were completed by the program director and program leader before choosing to assign a child to a different age group. Evidence: 1. Documentation from the records of children #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, all age two and assigned to the 3 year old group, contained written assessments that had designated spaces for two teacher signatures and two parent signatures. These assessments were not signed by the program director at the time of inspection. 2. Interview with the program director confirmed that she did not conduct the assessments of the children with the program leader.”
-
8VAC20-780-40-E
The inspectors’ words, 278 words
“Based on observation and document review, the licensee failed to ensure that the center’s activities and services were maintained in compliance with the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by these standards. Evidence: 1.Per the center’s Playground Safety Procedures: ?Supervision on the playground is active. Staff must stand, interact, and circulate to ensure all children are playing safely. A combination of supervision ?zones? with some staff also circulating the playground is to be used. - A staff member must always monitor and assist children while on playground equipment. -Staff must spread out into zones to maintain full visualization of the entire playground, and to be sure children are not exiting the playground or reentering the building on their own. -If a single staff member is supervising the playground, that staff member must limit children from playing in areas that are not in line of sight of that staff member. -Teachers must not congregate.? 2. Upon driving into the parking lot while arriving at the center, the Licensing Inspector (LI) and Licensing Administrator (LA)observed a group of children and two staff on the playground. The two staff were standing face-to-face at the top of the hillside, engaged in conversation amongst themselves. After circling the parking lot, the LI and LA observed that the two staff remained standing face-to-face engaged in conversation while children were observed at the bottom of the hillside. One child was punched approximately three times by another child and a different child was pushed to the ground. The LA intervened by calling attention to the activities of the children to the staff, who had been engaged in conversation amongst themselves for approximately two minutes.”
-
8VAC20-780-500-A
“Based on observation, the center failed to ensure children’s hands are washed with soap and running water after toileting. Evidence: In the Cheetah classroom, child #12 was observed exiting the restroom without washing his hands. Staff #4 confirmed the child used the restroom and staff were unaware the child’s hands were not washed.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Repeat VIolation Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that a staff record contained documentation to demonstrate that the individual possesses the education, certification, and experience required by the job position, and orientation and training as required in 8VAC20-780-240 and 8VAC20-780-245. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #3, Program Leader, did not contain documentation that the staff fulfilled a high school program completion or the equivalent.”
Sep 6, 2023: inspection11 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-4
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Repeat Violation Based on a review of staff records and interview, the center failed to ensure to obtain the results of a check of an out-of-state child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent by the end of the 30th day of employment for each employee who has resided in any other state in the preceding five years. Evidence: 1. The record of staff #6, hired 04/03/2023, did not contain documentation of an out-of-state child abuse and neglect result. Staff #6 indicated living in a previous state on the staff’s sworn disclosure statement. 2. Staff #7 confirmed the result was not obtained.”
-
8VAC20-780-270-A
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition. Evidence: 1. On the playground, approximately six steps and the handrails, going up the play structure contained chipped paint and rust and rusted bolts. 2. The bike carousel contained five bikes with rusted handlebars and the center disc was also rusted. 3. Staff #1 and staff #5 confirmed the equipment contained rust.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure that hazardous substances were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1. The Giraffe classroom, ages 18 months-24 months, had an unlocked upper cabinet that contained disinfectant, Windex, and Febreze with labels that stated “keep out of reach of children” and “caution.” 2. Staff # 5 confirmed the cabinet was not locked.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-D
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure the cleaning and sanitizing materials shall not be located above food and shall be stored in areas physically separate from food. Evidence: 1. In the Giraffe classroom, hand sanitizer was located laying on it’s side, on a wire shelf directly above food from a child’s lunch in ziplock bags. 2. Staff #5 confirmed the hand sanitizer was located above food.”
-
8VAC20-780-440-B
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure that cribs shall be identified for use by a specific child. Evidence: In the Lion room, two cribs were occupied by infants and the cribs were not labeled to identify use by a specific child. Staff #1 confirmed the cribs were not labeled.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-E
“Based on a review of records, the center failed to ensure to implement a minimum of two shelter-in-place drills per year for the most likely to occur scenarios. Evidence: There was no documentation of shelter-in-place drills being practiced in 2021 and 2022.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-F
“Based on a review of the log for procedures for emergencies, the center failed to ensure lockdown procedures are practiced at least annually. Evidence: There was no documentation of a lockdown drill being practiced in 2021 and 2022.”
-
8VAC20-780-560-G
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Based on observation and interview on September 6, 2023, the center failed to ensure food from home shall be sealed and clearly dated and labeled in a way that identifies the owner. Evidence: 1. In the Lion room, there were six infant bottles not dated. There were two bottles dated 8/21. 2. In the Monkey room, there was one bottle dated 8/6. 3. In the Giraffe room, there were four thermos containers not dated. 4. In the Zebra room, there was crackers and yogurt in a cubby which were not labeled or dated. 5. In the Cheetah room, there were 13 lunchboxes that were not dated.”
-
8VAC20-780-570-C
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure to maintain a record of each child on formula to include the brand of formula. Evidence: 1. The Lion room did not contain documentation of the brand of formula for seven children on formula. 2.The Monkey room did not contain documentation of the brand of formula for two children on formula. 3. Staff #5 confirmed they did not have the brand of formula.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Repeat Violation Systemic Deficiency Based on a review of children’s records and interview, the center failed to ensure that each child’s record contained the required information. Evidence: 1. The record of child #4, enrolled 06/12/2022, contained documentation of immunizations that were dated 06/19/2023, which was not prior to enrollment. 2. The record of child #4, enrolled 06/12/2022, contained documentation of a physical that was dated 06/12/2023, which was not before the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. 3. Staff #1 confirmed that child #4 did not have immunizations and a physical in the required timeframe.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on a review of staff records, the center failed to ensure that two or more references were checked before employment. Evidence: The records of staff #2, hired 08/04/2023, and staff #4, hired 09/01/2023, did not contain documentation of two references.”
Apr 18, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 206 words
“Based on the review of nine child records, the program failed to ensure that each enrolled child has a record including all required information for five children. Evidence: 1. The record for Child #1 was missing the following: parent’s work phone number, doctor’s name and phone number, two emergency contacts, and signed written agreement. 2. The record for Child #2 was missing the following: proof of identity, first day immunizations, and physical. 3. The record for Child #7 was missing the following: sex, address, parent(s) name, address, and phone number, parent(s) work and phone number, doctor’s name and phone number, two emergency contacts, authorization to pick up information, signed written agreement, proof of identity, immunizations, and physical. 4. The record for Child #8 was missing the following: sex, address, parent(s) name, address, and phone number, parent(s) work and phone number, doctor’s name and phone number, two emergency contacts, authorization to pick up information, signed written agreement, proof of identity, and physical. 5. The record for Child #9 was missing the following: immunizations by the first day of attendance. 6. The administrator confirmed that the items were missing from the files and that they were currently working on cleaning up files and contacting parents regarding missing information.”
Jan 17, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Based on review of ten staff records, the program did not ensure that the results from a criminal history record check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry were obtained from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years for one staff. Evidence: 1. The date of employment for Staff #7 was 10/20/2022. There were no results from a search of the child abuse and neglect registry in the file for the two previous states of residence. The request for one of the states was mailed 11/30/2022, more than thirty days after employment began.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on a review of ten staff records, the program did not ensure that a sworn statement was completed prior to the first day of employment for one staff. Evidence: 1. The start date for Staff # 2 was 10/10/2022. The completed sworn statement was dated 10/17/2022. 2. Administrators confirmed date of 10/17/2022 on the form signed through DocuSign.”
Oct 18, 2022: complaint inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, program failed to post the notice of the Superintendent’s intent (NOI) at a prominent place at each public entrance.
“Evidence: When the Licensing inspector and Licensing Administrator arrived on 10/18/2022, the NOI was not posted at the entrance. The NOI was issued 7/21/2022.”
-
Based on observation, program failed to post the Special Order (SO) issued by the Superintendent.
“Evidence: When the Licensing inspector and Licensing Administrator arrived on 10/18/2022, the SO was not posted at the entrance.”
-
Based on a review of four staff records, the program did not ensure that a national criminal history record check was completed prior to the first day of employment for one staff.
“Evidence: The start date for Staff #1 was 10/10/2022. There were no valid results in the file.”
-
Based on a review of four staff records, the program did not ensure that a sworn statement was completed prior to the first day of employment for one staff.
“Evidence: The start date for Staff # 1 was 10/10/2022. There was no valid sworn statement in the file.”
-
Based on a review of four staff records, the program did not deny continued employment for five staff when the results from the central registry check were not received within 30 days of employment.
“Evidence: The start date for Staff #1 was 10/10/2022. There were no results in the file.”
-
Based on the review of four staff records, the program did not ensure that the documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening was completed within the last thirty calendar days of the date of employment for one staff.
“Evidence: The dated of employment for Staff #1 was 10/10/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 8/10/2022.”
-
Based on review of four staff files, program did not ensure that orientation was completed within seven days of assuming job responsibilities for one staff.
“Evidence: The start date for Staff #1 was 10/10/2022. Orientation paperwork was not in the file.”
Aug 24, 2022: inspection11 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of ten staff records, the program did not ensure that a national criminal history record check was completed prior to the first day of employment for two staff.
“Evidence: 1. The start date for Staff #2 was 4/7/2022. The results in the file were dated 4/11/2022. 2. The start date for Staff #5 was 2/2/2022. The results in the file were dated 2/14/2022.”
-
Based on review of ten staff records, program did not ensure that the results from a criminal history record check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry wer obtained from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years for two staff.
“Evidence: 1. The start date for Staff #2 was 4/7/2022. There were no results from a search of the child abuse and neglect registry in the file for the previous state of residence. 2. The start date for Staff # 5 was 2/2/2022. There were no results from a criminal history record check, a sex offender registry check, nor a search of the child abuse and neglect registry for either of the two previous states of residence.”
-
Based on a review of ten staff records, the program did not ensure that a sworn statement was completed prior to the first day of employment for one staff.
“Evidence: The start date for Staff # 4 was 4/11/2022. The sworn statement was completed on 8/27/2022.”
-
Based on a review of ten staff records, the program did not deny continued employment for five staff when the results from the central registry check were not received within 30 days of employment.
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Evidence: 1. The start date for Staff #1 was 8/1/2022. Request was mailed 8/17/2022. There are no results in the file. 2. The start date for Staff #3 was 5/30/2022. Third request was mailed 8/17/2022. There are no results in the file. 3. The start date for Staff #4 was 4/11/2022. Request was mailed 9/9/2022. There are no results in the file. 4. The start date for Staff #5 was 2/2/2022. The results in the file were dated 9/11/2022. 5. The start date for Staff #9 was 7/28/2022. The results in the file were dated 9/11.2022.”
-
Based on the review of ten staff records, the program did not ensure that the documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening was completed within the last thirty calendar days of the date of employment for seven staff.
The inspectors’ words, 134 words
“Evidence: 1. The date of employment for Staff #1 was 8/1/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 9/9/2022. 2. The date of employment for Staff #2 was 4/7/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 4/12/2022. 3. The date of employment for Staff #4 was 4/11/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 9/6/2019. 4. The date of employment for Staff #5 was 2/2/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 2/11/2022. 5. The date of employment for Staff #7 was 1/3/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 5/11/2022. 6. The date of employment for Staff #8 was 3/14/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 3/17/2022. 7. The date of employment for Staff #9 was 7/28/2022. The TB screening in the file was dated 12/14/2021.”
-
Based on observation, the program did not ensure that cribs are identified for use by a specific child.
“Evidence: There were four cribs in the Lions room, but none of them were identified for use by a specific child.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the program did not ensure that cribs are used for children under 12 months of age.
“Evidence: 1. There were seven children, aged 8 weeks to 8 months old, in the Lions room. Only four cribs were available. 2. When Staff #1 was asked where the other three children slept, she pointed to the center of the room where children were sleeping in their bouncy chair.”
-
Based on observation, the program did not ensure that children’s hands were washed with soap and running water or disposable wipes before and after eating snacks or meals.
“Evidence: Two children in the Monkeys room were eating upon inspector’s arrival. Once the children finished eating, they were removed from the table and placed on the rug to play, without washing hands.”
-
Based on observation, the program did not ensure that prepared infant formula was dated and labeled with the child’s name.
“Evidence: There were two bottles in the refrigerator of the Lions room that had no name or date.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the program did not ensure that the most recently issued license was posted.
“Evidence: 1. The license that was posted expired 9/19/2019. 2. Administrator looked and confirmed that the license was expired.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the program did not ensure that a copy of the notice of intent from the Superintendent was posted in a prominent place at each public entrance to the facility to advise consumers of serious or persistent violations.
“Evidence: 1. The notice of intent (NOI), issued to facility yn 7/21/2022, was not posted at the entrance. 2. When Staff #6 (first day of employment was 8/15/2022) was asked where the NOI was posted, she was not aware of its existence.”
Mar 8, 2022: complaint inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on interviews, the program did not ensure the care and protection of children.
“Evidence: 1. The Program Director stated that they were made aware of a social media post on 1/13/22 claiming that a child in their care was given the wrong bottle. 2. Two former staff admitted the error to the Program Director when they were questioned. 3, Staff were retrained on proper infant feeding procedures.”
-
Based on observation and interviews, the program did not ensure that the required staff-to-children ratios were followed when children were in care.
The inspectors’ words, 171 words
“Evidence: 1. While touring the facility on March 8, 2022 beginning at 12:04 pm, the LI observed five children in the care of one staff member in the Lions room (Infants aged 3 months-9 months). 2. While touring the facility on March 8, 2022 beginning at 12:04 pm, the LI observed five children in the care of one staff member in the Monkeys room (Infants aged 9 months-14 months). 3. When Staff #1 was asked what the staff-to-child ratio was, she stated that it was 1:5. The LI informed her that it was 1:4, to which she responded in the two months of her employment, she usually had five children in her care. 4. When the LI pointed out to Staff #2 that she would have been within ratio had she not taken Child #1 into care when she arrived at 12:04 pm. Staff #2 stated that she did not feel that she could turn away children that were enrolled in the program and that was the responsibility of the director.”
-
Based on observation, the program did not ensure that the required staff-to-children ratios were followed when children were in care.
“Evidence: 1. While touring the facility on March 8, 2022 beginning at 12:04 pm, the LI observed twenty children in the care of two staff members in the Elephant room (Two year old children).”
-
Based on observation and interviews, the program did not ensure that the required staff-to-children ratios were followed when children were in care.
“Evidence: 1. While touring the facility on March 8, 2022 beginning at 12:04 pm, the LI observed eighteen children in the care of one staff member in the Tigers room (Children aged three and four). 2. Staff #3 admitted that there were some staff that were out with illness, but stated she is typically out of ratio.”
-
Based on review of ten incident reports, the program did not ensure that all required information was completed.
“Evidence: 1. On the report dated 11/3/21, the time of the incident was not listed on the report. 2. On the report dated 11/8/21, there was only one signature on the report. 3. On the report dated 10/19/21, there was only one signature on the report.”
All 29 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 11, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Sep 11, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 15, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 15, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 15, 2025 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 27, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 27, 2024 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Sep 6, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 6, 2023 | Inspection | 11 violations cited |
| Apr 18, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Apr 18, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 18, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 18, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 17, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Oct 18, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Aug 24, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 24, 2022 | Inspection | 11 violations cited |
| Aug 24, 2022 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 8, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Mar 8, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 8, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Sep 27, 2021 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 27, 2021 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Mar 19, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 120 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 8 complaint inspections on record.
- 2 complaint allegations published with Virginia’s findings, 2 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2022 | Complaint | Allegation: Food service/Nutrition. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| May 11, 2022 | Complaint | Allegation: Supervision. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 64 child care providers in Albemarle County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 20.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Mountaintop Montessori | 0 |
| Bright Beginnings, Inc. - Forest Lakes This child care provider | 20 |
| Lighthouse Worship Center, Inc. | 10 |
| Faith Christian Center International | 2 |
| The Frost Montessori School of Albemarle | 10 |
| Charlottesville Northridge Community Church of the Nazarene | 4 |
| Bright Eyes Community Child Care Center, LLC | 10 |
| Albemarle Montessori Children’s Community | 13 |
| Restoration United Methodist Church | 0 |
| Generations Montessori School of Charlottesville, LLC | 12 |
| KinderCare Education, LLC- Riverbend | 41 |
| YMCA Early Learning Center at Sentara Martha Jefferson | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.