Rappahannock Area YMCA
A child day center in Falmouth, Virginia 22405
212 Butler Road, Falmouth, Virginia 22405. (540) 371-9622, ext. 1038.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 5 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jun 42026 the latest visit on record
- 240 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 inspections on record, the latest on Jun 4, 2026.
5 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jun 4, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Each center shall maintain and keep a separate record for each child enrolled which shall contain a written care plan for each child with diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.
“The record for Child #5 contained documentation of a diagnosed food allergy. There was no written allergy care plan from a physician on record. Child #5 had been enrolled in the program for three days.”
Nov 17, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with the children.
“Evidence: 1. The screening for Staff #1 was completed one day after their employment. 2. The screening for Staff #7 was completed four days after their employment”
-
A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the last screening.
“Evidence: The tuberculosis screening for Staff #2 was dated 11/8/23. The updated screening was due nine days ago.”
Jun 26, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on review five staff records, the center did not obtain documentation of the results of a central registry search within 30 days of employment for all staff members.
“Evidence: 1. The record for Staff #1 with an employment date of 3/6/24, the results of the Central registry search background check was dated 4/14/24. 2. The record for Staff #2 with an employment date of 8/31/21, the results of the Central registry search background check was dated 10/1/21. 3. The record for Staff #3 with an employment date of 10/25/21, the results of the Central registry search background check was dated 12/7/21.”
-
Based on record review and staff interviews, the center did not ensure that all program leaders had documentation of high school program completion or equivalent on file.
“Evidence: The record for Staff #4, with a title of teacher, did not contain documentation of education.”
Jul 23, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of five staff files, the center did not obtain documentation of a tuberculosis (TB) screening for staff at the time of employment and prior to coming in contact with children
“Evidence: The record for Staff #4, with a start date of 7/1/21, did not contain documentation of a tuberculosis screening at the time of inspection”
-
Repeat Violation
“Based on observation and measurement, the center did not ensure that resilient surfacing complies with the minimum safety standard where playground equipment is provided. Evidence: There was less than one inch of mulch observed at the base of the composite play structure and four swings. The mulch has deteriorated into dirt and grass is growing throughout the fall zones. Six inches of resilient surfacing is required based on the height of the play equipment and the type of resilient surfacing.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the center did not ensure behavioral guidance was constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate.
“Evidence: At approximately 10:30am on 7/25/23, Licensing Inspectors (LIs) observed Child #6, 12-years-old, sitting outside at a picnic table alone with no activity while the kindergarten group of five and six-year-olds played nearby. Interview with director revealed that Child #6 was bothering their sibling in the other class so Child #6 was moved from their age group to the kindergarten group at 8 am.”
-
Repeat Violation
The inspectors’ words, 102 words
“Based on observation and interview, the center did not meet all the requirements for sunscreen application. Evidence: 1. Staff stated that liquid sunscreen is applied by the children in all classrooms and spray sunscreen is applied by the teacher. The standard requires staff apply all sunscreen to children eight-years -old and under. 2. There was no written documentation from parents of any adverse reactions to sunscreen as required in the standards. 3. In the first grade group, nine containers of sunscreen did not contain a label with a child’s name. When asked, staff could not identify the owner of the unlabeled sunscreen.”
Dec 28, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-550-F
“Based on review of the emergency drill log, it was determined that not all lockdown procedures were practiced annually as required. Evidence: There were no documented lockdown drill in 2022.”
-
8VAC20-780-80-A
“Based on review of the written attendance record, and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the written record of daily attendance documents the arrival and departure of all children in care as it occurs. Evidence: staff stated that there were 14 children present, and 14 children were observed, however only 13 children were included on the attendance sheet.”
Jul 20, 2022: inspection5 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-340-A
The inspectors’ words, 166 words
“Based on observation, the facility failed to ensure the children’s care, protection, and guidance. Evidence: 1) Children were observed moving between classrooms, the locker room, the outdoor pavilion/picnic tables, two indoor pools, and the waterpark. Staff did not take attendance before, during or after the transition to the new area and only counted the children. There was no clear communication or method to account for all children at all times. 2) Staff in the indoor exercise pool stated that they were supervising nine children in the non-swimmer section of the pool however ten children were observed swimming in this area. The depth of the water in the non-swimmer area was approximately four feet. 3) Staff in the indoor wellness pool could not state which children they were responsible for or which children could swim in the non-swimmer section of the pool. Six of the 21 children in the group had not passed a swim test. The depth of the water was approximately three feet, six inches.”
-
8VAC20-780-350-B-4
“Based on observation, the facility failed to maintain the required ratio of one staff member for every ten children, ages three years to the age of eligibility to attend public school. Evidence: In the KinderCamp group there were 12 preschool children (three to five years of age) eating lunch, supervised by one staff member. Staff stated that the second staff member was in the locker room changing into their swimming suit. The second staff member returned to the classroom after approximately five to seven minutes.”
-
8VAC20-780-480-A
The inspectors’ words, 273 words
“Based on observation, and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the posted rules of a public pool. Evidence: 1) The rules posted at the waterpark stated: a. All non-swimmers must stay in water below their armpits b. Any child wearing a personal flotation device (PFD) must be within arms-reach of their guardian 2) Multiple children in the KinderCamp group were observed swimming in a section of the waterpark where the water was higher than their armpits. The depth of the water where the children were swimming was approximately two feet, six inches to three feet. 3) Two children were observed swimming with PFD’s and were not in arms reach of staff at all times. 4) The rules posted at the two indoor pools stated: a. All non-swimmers must stay in water below their armpits b. Everyone under the age of 16 must take a swim test 5) Three out of four non-swimmers in the Wilderness Warriors group were observed swimming in a section of the indoor exercise pool where the water was higher than their armpits. The depth of the water where the children were swimming was approximately four feet. 6) Children in the Campers Unite group were observed swimming in a section of the wellness pool and did not have wrist bands indicating whether or not they could swim which was the stated policy. The water in the section where these children were swimming was above some of the children’s armpits with a depth of approximately three feet, six inches. 7) Staff acknowledged that they were aware of the policies for non-swimmers and swim tests.”
-
8VAC20-780-520-B
“Based on observation, and an interview with staff, it was determined that not all sunscreen requirements were met. Evidence: 15 of 47 sunscreens observed in bins in the pavilion were not labeled with a child’s name.”
-
8VAC20-780-80-A
“Based on review of the written attendance record, and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure all children were included on the written attendance record. Evidence: in the campout crafter group, staff stated that there were 19 children present, and 19 children were observed, however only 14 children were included on the attendance sheet.”
Jun 21, 2022: inspection7 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-330-B
“Based on an inspection of the playground, it was determined that the mulch under and around play equipment was not resilient. Evidence: The depth of the wood chips under and around the composite play structure was approximately one - two inches in depth.”
-
8VAC20-780-340-A
The inspectors’ words, 164 words
“Based on observation, the facility failed to ensure the children’s care, protection, and guidance. Evidence: on 6/21/22, for a period of time between the hours of 1:00 ? 3:00 pm, two staff were observed supervising a group of 22 children approximately 7-8 years of age. Staff did not have a system of communicating or accounting for children. Staff #1 was observed sitting on the edge of the pool with their feet in the water. Staff #2 was observed standing in the water. Staff stated that neither was responsible for a set group of children. When pool time was over, neither staff took attendance or counted the children to determine that all children had exited the pool. Staff followed the group of children to the pavilion, without coordinating or confirming that all children were with them. When they arrived at the pavilion, another group of children was present, and staff again failed to do a head count or check the attendance until the LI intervened.”
-
8VAC20-780-480-C
“Based on observation, and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize a system for accounting for all children in the water. Evidence: Two staff were supervising 22 children at a public waterpark. Staff stated that they could not identify where the 22 children were, and whether or not they were in or out of the water. The children in care did not have anything to distinguish themselves from non daycare children at the public waterpark.”
-
8VAC20-780-500-A
“Based on observation, the facility failed to ensure that children wash their hands with soap and water or disposable wipes after eating. Evidence: Children were observed eating lunch and they did not wash their hands or use disposable wipes afterwards.”
-
8VAC20-780-510-E
“Based on review of 10 medications and authorization forms, the facility failed to follow the facility’s medication procedures as required. Long term prescription drug use and over-the-counter medication may be allowed with written authorization from the child’s physician and parent. Evidence: 1. The medication for child #1 did not have a parent’s authorization. Three medications for child #2 did not have a parent’s authorization or a physician’s signature for long-term administration.”
-
8VAC20-780-520-B
“Based on observation, and an interview with staff, it was determined that not all sunscreen requirements were met. Evidence: 1) Not all sunscreen was labeled with the child’s name 2) Children under nine years of age were observed administering sunscreen on themselves and others, including spraying the sunscreen on faces.”
-
8VAC20-780-520-D
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Based on observation, and an interview with staff, it was determined that not all insect repellent requirements were met. Evidence: 1) Not all children with insect repellent had parent authorization noting adverse reactions 2) Not all insect repellent was labeled with the child’s name; children were observed sharing it 3) Not all insect repellent was inaccessible to children; insect repellent was observed in a child’s backpack 4) A record was not kept that included the child’s name, date of use, frequency of application and any adverse reactions 5) Children were observed administering insect repellent on themselves and others”
All 18 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 17, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 17, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jun 12, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 12, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 20, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 20, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 26, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 26, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 25, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 23, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| May 10, 2023 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 28, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 28, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 20, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 20, 2022 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jun 21, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 21, 2022 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Nov 11, 2026.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 3 years - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 240 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 87 child care providers in Stafford County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 5.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Rappahannock Area YMCA This child care provider | 5 |
| Children of America Deacon Road | 35 |
| YMCA SACC at Conway Elementary School | 5 |
| YMCA SACC at Ferry Farm Elementary | 3 |
| Cadence Academy Preschool - Fredericksburg | 60 |
| YMCA SACC at Falmouth Elementary School | 7 |
| Mrs. Denise Shields | 3 |
| YMCA SACC at Grafton Village Elementary School | 5 |
| The Merit School of Leeland Station (#31) | 26 |
| Ferry Farm Baptist Church | 0 |
| House of Victory Fredericksburg Church | 14 |
| Dineshia Taylor | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.