Hearth Record

Back to Lubricants

Blaster pro lubricants

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Aug 29, 2025. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Aug 29, 2025the latest report was made
  • Aug 29, 2025the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Blaster pro
Maker
THE BLASTER CORPORATIONMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
LubricantsCPSC’s product type: Lubricants (code 913), in Home Maintenance and Structures: Household Chemicals, Paint, & Cleaning Products

By month

1 report from September 2024 to August 2025; the most in August 2025, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
August 20251

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Aug 29, 2025, sent to the company Jan 7, 2026, published by CPSC Jan 22, 2026

    The product, in the report: multipurpose lubricant

    These cans come with a pipet taped to them. The consumer attached it, so he would only use a little bit of the product.

    He carefully sprayed the 4’ tract of a sliding glass door. He opened the door and sprayed it again because the door had been difficult to open. He moved the door back and forth a few times, hoping it would spread through the other areas of the tract.

    Within a couple hours, there was a terrible oily mechanical viscous taste in his mouth. Six weeks have passed, and he still has the taste in his mouth. Even his coffee doesn’t taste right.

    He tried to clean the substance off the tract, with baking soda, [REDACTED] dishwashing liquid mixed with water 1 to 9 parts. He also tried rubbing alcohol. The consumer also placed odor eaters and active charcoal packets, in his home, but none of the steps he tried, removed the odor.

    He saw his doctor, who prescribed cortico-steroids for a week. The consumer did not feel as bad, but still experienced symptoms.

    A week later he also experienced headaches, lung aches, kidney aches, fatigue and his thinking has been foggy.

    The consumer’s landlord provided the spray, and he is not sure when or where it was purchased from.

    (approx.. 8/15/2025): The consumer’s nurse advised him to go to the ER. A brain CT-scan, chest Xray, blood and urine analysis were performed.

    The fire department checked his home for elevated CO levels, but they were normal.

    He has consulted various cleaning companies and the price ranged from $1500.00 and $1600.00. Another company, [REDACTED], indicated that they charge $120 per hour, for their services.

    The consumer saw a [REDACTED] video that showed a person casually spraying this product, while using it. However, the consumer said he may have seen information sugging that a ventilator and chemical proof suit be used when applying this substance.

    He has called the company 3 times and the last rep. told him that he should just move out of his home

    The consumer may have used 2 – 3 tablespoons of this stuff and 6 weeks later (8/28/2025), it is still affecting him.

    He believes that the manufacturer should cover the cost of having his home cleaned. All medical expenses...cost of air purifier + filters...

    Model
    50 Multi-Purpose Lubricant
    Bought from
    unknown
    Where
    Bethesda, Maryland: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Blaster pro, made or sold by THE BLASTER CORPORATION
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Lubricants

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.