WattCycle batteries
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Mar 28, 2026. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Mar 28, 2026the latest report was made
- Mar 28, 2026the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- WattCycle
- Maker
- SHENZHEN WASHI ENERGY CO., LTD. dba WattCycleMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- BatteriesCPSC’s product type: Batteries (code 884), in Electronics: Batteries & Chargers
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| March 2026 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made Mar 28, 2026, sent to the company Apr 1, 2026, published by CPSC Apr 15, 2026
The product, in the report: The company name is WattCycle. Product name is “Wattcycle LiFePO4 2560Wh 25.6v 100Ah” and their similar product that is equally hazardous is “Wattcycle LiFePO4 1280Wh 12.8v 100Ah”. The dimensions are 19 x 9.4 x 6.6 inches for the 25.6v 100Ah model. The 12.8v model is roughly half the size. The battery case is black, with the wattcycle logo on each side, with product specifications printed on the sticker. These batteries are used in RVs, boats, solar energy storage systems, backup power, etc.
The battery company “WattCycle” is selling chemically unstable and unsafe batteries, advertised as “Grade A” (brand new). When a LiFePO4 battery is severely undercharged below 2.5 volts (the manufacturers specified max cutoff limit) the battery is to be considered scrap and must be discarded appropriately. I have recieved a lithium battery from them advertised as “like new” grade A cells. Each cell read .17 volts, which is 14 times lower then the absolute discharge safety limit. I contacted them in regards to this, and they told me to attempt to charge them fully and test them. Upon charging them, all 4 cells swelled severely and put much tension on the busbars. I told them I would like a replacement. Heres their response, quoted. “Thank you for your update. For the tension on the busbars, you can simply use cable ties to secure the cells together. This should keep them stable and safe for use. There is no need to return them or request a replacement.” Cell swelling is caused by extreme gas buildup inside, causing delamination and potential internal shorts and is likely of thermal runaway. Now moving on to my real problem, as I bought more of their cells listed as “grade A” two out of a dozen i bought in a order were also severely undercharged. I contacted them, and they refused to replace them, saying its not covered by our warranty. As for one of the battery packs that had good testing cells like the rest of them, two have severely physically damaged cells. One, being crushed. The other, having very deep dents. I ended up using both of these damaged cells, since the internet for years has told me that the chemistry Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) is very safe and unlikely to have mishaps. The cell that had crush damage, ended up having a thermal runaway, causing a fire in my trailer. The cell was installed in the center of my energy storage system, and spread to the neighboring cells. The fire department spent over an hour spraying the whole build in water, and it would continue reigniting. Luckily I have no injuries, however did breathe fumes, and was indeed in extreme danger due to the cell having a primary pressure discharge/explosion, taking a bright flash fireball to my face, luckily the flame was so brief it did not cause me to suffer burns. According to sources, obviously any physical deformation of these battery cells causes it to be hazardous and unusable due to the changes in shape internally. I am a very experienced battery builder, doing this for over a half a decade, and spending even more time beyond that watching thousands of [REDACTED] videos on battery builds and battery/energy science. My biggest point in this lesson, is that in my small sample of two dozen battery packs purchased from wattcycle (for pulling out cells for repurposing), BEYOND the fact that they are selling scrap unstable batteries and being encouraged to use them with no worry, is the companies dangerous act of using damaged cells in their battery packs that they cell across the nation and globally. If in my statistic of every 24 battery packs, there are two damaged cells, I cant imagine how many products with these issues are in the hands of consumers who are using them heavily each day, and in critical areas aswell such as a house and garage. I am trying to take this to court and get my losses reimbursed which is currently around 3,000 dollars. More importantly, they need to be investigated for recklessness and negligence with their products. This may warrant product recalls. I have documented absolutely everything from photographing the damaged cells even before my battery build began. Email logs from wattcycle, videos of the fire from minutes before the event, during the event, and after the event. Provided will be my phone number, I can answer any further questions and send all the evidence on request. The EPA had to get involved due to the firefighters water washing lithium battery material and chemicals down the storm drain on the side of the road, leading to lake erie. My residence is 8 minutes from shores. My local fire department was unable to take posession of these unstable batteries due to the risk. They for 4 days now have been laying distanced in my backyard. We still are not sure on how to get rid of them.
- Model
- WT24V100AH100
- Bought from
- wattcycle.com
- Bought
- Mar 18, 2026
- Where
- oregon, Ohio: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 23, Unspecified
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand WattCycle, made or sold by SHENZHEN WASHI ENERGY CO., LTD. dba WattCycle
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.