Hearth Record

Back to Other manual workshop tools

HARDY other manual workshop tools

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Oct 25, 2017. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Oct 25, 2017the latest report was made
  • Oct 25, 2017the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
HARDY
Maker
Harbor Freight ToolsMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Other manual workshop toolsCPSC’s product type: Other Manual Workshop Tools (code 881), in Home Maintenance and Structures: Tools & Hardware

By month

1 report from November 2016 to October 2017; the most in October 2017, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
October 20171

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Oct 25, 2017, sent to the company Nov 2, 2017, published by CPSC Nov 17, 2017

    The product, in the report: Full Grain Work Gloves - Harbor Freight Tools product #63153.

    Cutaneous exposure to a yellow dye on 10-2-2017 that dissolved out of yellow leather work gloves and into my hands, apparently due to perspiration. Subsequently I found that my wife had some weeks before worn these gloves while doing garden work at home and noticed how her hands had also become stained with the yellow dye that had dissolved out of the gloves after only using them for a short period of time. I also wore these gloves while doing gardening in our back yard and did not use or come into contact with any other chemicals or other potentially harmful substances. Within 24 hours of using these gloves I began to suffer from headache, eye irritation, urinary problems and severe fatigue. The dye remained in the skin and nails of both my hands for five days, resisting both immediate and frequent washings with soap and water to attempt removal. These gloves were purchased locally from a Harbor Freight Tools retail store as product item attached and sewn into the glove: Full Grain Work Gloves #63153. I contacted Harbor Freight Tools of Camarillo, CA by phone (888-866-5797) and spoke with their representative, [REDACTED] about the possible health risks to people wearing these gloves if the bright yellow dye proves to be an aniline dye. Subsequently, the dye was confirmed by email to me on 10-11-2017 to be aniline dye by HFT Product Support representative, [REDACTED].

    I found that other HFT consumers had submitted complaints of yellow staining of the hands from these same gloves, and therefore, I submitted a negative comment to the HFT web page for this product, stating that there was a potential health risk to wearing these gloves, due to the aniline dye not being properly “fixed” to prevent it from being absorbed into the skin via hand perspiration. I did not complain of the symptoms I had experienced with this comment submission.

    HFT screened out my consumer comment from their product web page, of a potential for toxic exposure to consumers that I submitted with this product on or about 10-11-2017. They did email to me a boiler plate response within 24 hours thanking me for my comment and stated that their screening policy is to allow/disallow consumer comments to their product web pages within a period of 7 days. It has now been 2 weeks since I submitted my comment, so I am assuming they chose not to let their consumers know of the potential dangers of their product. However, I did find a few days after submitting my comment, they continue to market this glove on their web site but with a different photograph of these #63153 Full Grain Work Gloves accompanying their product description. The photograph has been changed to a different photograph of a tan color leather work glove that does not match these bright yellow gloves at all. Also, for over a year, I have seen a thick cloth work glove of the same bright yellow hue marketed in several HFT retail stores. I do not know if the dye in those is also able to penetrate the skin.

    I contacted my state office of epidemiology (in New Mexico) within 48 hours of recognizing that my symptom complaints were related to the use of these gloves, and even though I am a medical doctor, the person with whom I spoke was unable to complete their toxic exposure report because I had not actually seen a doctor.

    Serial number
    #63153
    Where
    Las Cruces, New Mexico: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 69, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand HARDY, made or sold by Harbor Freight Tools
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Other manual workshop tools

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.