Ring smoke and carbon monoxide alarms
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Dec 3, 2023. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Dec 3, 2023the latest report was made
- Dec 3, 2023the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Ring
- Maker
- Ring Protect Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Smoke and carbon monoxide alarmsBoth in oneCPSC’s product type: Combination Fire/Smoke Alarm and Carbon Monoxide Detector (code 714), in Home Maintenance and Structures: Home Security
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| December 2023 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made Dec 3, 2023, sent to the company Dec 26, 2023, published by CPSC Jan 22, 2024
The product, in the report: Alarm Smoke and CO Listener https://ring.com/products/alarm-smoke-co-listener
Ring Alarm Smoke and CO Listener device (https://ring.com/products/alarm-smoke-co-listener) reports low battery erroneously. Will report a low battery, and several hour later rectify itself. Reported very often ([REDACTED] and Ring community). Article of another source: [REDACTED] I have tested the device when the LOW BATTERY has been reported to the Ring Base by pressing the smoke alarm test button, and it sounding the 110db plus alarm inches away from the Ring “listener” and it failed to report the “fire”! I have conducted this test three times, with the same result. The device is within 20 feet of the base unit and pretty much unobstructed. Functions properly and reports a “fire” test when the battery is detected full capacity. Battery tests good. This has been two completely different sensors reporting (of three I own) this same issue (that many seem to have the same issue with ). Moving and sensor closer and replacing the battery did not solve the issue at all (as support requests be done. This is a fire safety device that fails to provide the safety and dependability that a fire safety device should. I have purchased a new base unit (with [REDACTED]) (previous base unit 1 year old ) and it reports the exact same issue as well.
- Where
- mineral wells, West Virginia: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Unspecified
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- Brand Ring, made or sold by Ring Protect Inc.
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.