Hearth Record

Back to Fire extinguishers

Ougist fire extinguishers

2 reports to CPSC, the latest made May 26, 2025. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 2reports to CPSC
  • May 26, 2025the latest report was made
  • Sep 13, 2022the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Ougist
Makers
Ougist and ZHEJIANG ANSHUN FIRE FIGHTING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTDMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Fire extinguishersCPSC’s product type: Fire Extinguishers (code 701), in Home Maintenance and Structures: Home Security

By month

1 report from June 2024 to May 2025; the most in May 2025, 1. 1 earlier report, since September 2022, is in the table.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
May 20251
September 20221

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
  • No incident, no one hurt 1 CPSC: No Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made May 26, 2025, sent to the company Jun 2, 2025, published by CPSC Jun 16, 2025

    The product, in the report: It is a Ougist Fire Extinguisher (Model: MSWJ620) using S-6-AB as an extinguishing agent. The Bottle was crafted in Germany by MALL+HERLAN? (“Bottle Craft: Germany MALL+HERLAN”) Executive standard: XF86-2009

    My father purchased an Ougist fire extinguisher, Model: MSWJ620, from Amazon (Link: https://www.amazon.com/Extinguisher-Re-ignition-Extinguishing-Combustible-Electrically/dp/B09SCKL79L).

    The product description for this fire extinguisher makes a highly concerning and potentially dangerous claim: It states the extinguishing agent is “97% Negative Ion Water, 3% Fire Extinguishing Agent” and that it is capable of safely extinguishing Class A (ordinary combustibles), Class B (flammable liquids), Class C (charged electrical fires), and Class K (grease fires).

    However, the fire extinguisher canister itself explicitly states the “Extinguishing agent: S-6-AB.” Research into “S-6-AB” indicates it is a protein foam concentrate (typically 6 parts protein foam concentrate to 94 parts water).

    This is a critical contradiction. A protein foam extinguisher, like the one indicated on the canister, is NOT safe for use on energized electrical (Class C) fires due to conductivity, and is generally NOT recommended or effective for grease (Class K) fires, potentially causing dangerous splash-back or fire spread. The claim that a “water-based” (especially if it’s foam-based) extinguisher is safe for these fire types is contrary to established fire safety standards and poses a severe risk of injury or death to users, including electrocution or worsening of a grease fire.

    The Ougist company website (https://ougist.com/pages/about-us) provides no verifiable safety certifications relevant to US standards (e.g., UL) and contains significant amounts of dummy “Lorem Ipsum” text, indicating a lack of professional oversight. While the canister displays Chinese certifications (Metrology Accreditation (MA), China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment (CNAS), China Compulsory Certification (CCC), and International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation - Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ilac MRA)), these do not guarantee safety or efficacy for all claimed fire types, especially given the contradictory agent information and the absence of US-recognized safety certifications like UL.

    The product has not been used for any purpose yet, and no injuries have occurred. However, my concern is that if this product were to be used as advertised on an electrical or grease fire, it would very likely lead to serious injury or property damage due to the dangerous misinformation regarding its capabilities. It creates a false sense of security for consumers.

    Model
    MSWJ620
    UPC
    None
    Serial number
    None
    Bought from
    Amazon
    Bought
    Jul 1, 2024, about then
    Where
    Rancho Palos Verdes, California: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Ougist, made or sold by Ougist
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  2. No incident, no one hurt

    Made Sep 13, 2022, sent to the company Sep 26, 2022, published by CPSC Oct 11, 2022

    The product, in the report: Ougist Fire Extinguisher - 4 in-1 Fire Extinguishers for The House, Portable Car Fire Extinguisher, Water-Based Fire Extinguishers with UL Certification(620ml)

    I don’t have an incident, but I came across this on Amazon and it made me concerned. The fire extinguisher is listed as being >99% water-based, but also as certified for class B, C, and K fires. My understand was that water is never appropriate for C or K.

    I’ve just realized that I didn’t include the Amazon listing. It is here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B586JB7M/

    Model
    S-3-AB
    Where
    United States: Unspecified
    Who was involved
    Unknown
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Ougist, made or sold by ZHEJIANG ANSHUN FIRE FIGHTING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    No Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Fire extinguishers

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.