Hearth Record

Back to Runners, throw rugs or doormats

Belize memory foam rug from Frontgate runners, throw rugs or doormats

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Dec 5, 2011. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Dec 5, 2011the latest report was made
  • Dec 5, 2011the earliest
  • 1with the company’s comments
Brand
Belize memory foam rug from Frontgate
Maker
FrontgateMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Runners, throw rugs or doormatsCPSC’s product type: Runners, Throw Rugs or Doormats (code 612), in Home Maintenance and Structures: Flooring

By month

1 report from January 2011 to December 2011; the most in December 2011, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
December 20111

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Dec 5, 2011, sent to the company Jan 13, 2012, published by CPSC Jan 30, 2012

    The product, in the report: Memory foam bath rug

    After the consumer removed and disposed of the outer packaging and inner plastic envelope containing the rug, she noticed a petrochemical odor. She left the rug, folded in half with the fabric side out, to air overnight.

    The next morning the odor was so intense that it was hard to breathe in the large room where the rug was. Coincidently, houseplants there had drooped and developed brown leaf tips, possibly because of poor air quality. The consumer opened a window.

    When she unfolded the rug, she discovered that its rubberized back had an oily coating that was the odor’s source. She wondered whether the coating was a production error or intentional. A tag marked flammable was not accompanied by precautions such as she had seen on towels, pajamas, and other rugs.On or about 12/1/2011, the consumer called the customer service department ofthe catalogue company (Frontgate) that sold the rug. The customer service representative listened to the consumer’s concerns about the rug’s •Effect on air quality and its possible harm to children, adults, pets, or plants •Possible hyper-flammability because ofthe combination of fumes, oil, and fluffy top •Lack of usual “common sense” precautionary information.

    The representative said that the consumer should call another department -as the fust step in what the consumer understood would be a lengthy process that would allow the rugs to continue to be sold at least through the holiday season. The consumer declined a refund or replacement rug. At the time, the building where she lives was making repairs and taking materials away for disposal. She safety-pinned a warning to the rug,and her husband left it where materials for removal are put.

    The consumer hopes that the rugs’ odor will alert other consumers to possible danger. She believes these rugs are a likely hazard worthy ofinvestigation. She does not know the manufacturer, but the catalogue company that she ordered from should. She also worries that other distributors or retailers may be selling these rugs, perhaps under different names.

    Model
    45606/45607/45608/45610
    UPC
    unknown
    Serial number
    unknown
    Bought from
    Frontgate, Ohio
    Bought
    Nov 17, 2011
    Where
    Washington, District of Columbia: Unspecified
    Who was involved
    Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Belize memory foam rug from Frontgate, made or sold by Frontgate
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Runners, throw rugs or doormats

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.