Hearth Record

Back to Computers and video games

Verizon computers and video games

16 reports to CPSC, the latest made Jul 27, 2026. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 16reports to CPSC
  • Jul 27, 2026the latest report was made
  • Jun 19, 2015the earliest
  • 15with the company’s comments
Brand
Verizon
Makers
Verizon and Inseego CorpMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Computers and video gamesComputers, their equipment and electronic gamesCPSC’s product type: Computers (Equipment and Electronic Games) (code 557), in Electronics: Computers, Monitors, Projectors
Other ways the reports write the brand (5)

“VERIZON Ellipsis JetPack”, “Verizon Ellipsis Jetpack”, “Verizon Wireless Ellipsis Jetpack”, “Verizon Wireless Home Modem” and “Verizon [REDACTED]model 8800L”

By month

2 reports from August 2025 to July 2026; the most in July 2026, 1. 14 earlier reports, since June 2015, are in the table.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
July 20261
December 20251
April 20231
December 20221
January 20221
July 20211
June 20211
May 20213
April 20213
February 20211
December 20201
June 20151

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Hurt, no treatment 2 CPSC: Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  • Hurt, care not known 1 CPSC: Injury, Level of care not known
  • No one hurt 11 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
  • No incident, no one hurt 2 CPSC: No Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Jul 27, 2026, sent to the company Jul 30, 2026, published by CPSC Aug 13, 2026

    The product, in the report: Verizon Gizmo Watch 3 Adventure No Camera Model QTAX59 Gray Gray Band, Gray case with Gray silicone band, Height 1.65 inches, Width 1.81 inches, Depth 0.58 inches, Weight 1.75 ounces, Display 1.6 inches AMOLED 320 by 360, FCC ID HFS-QTAX59, Software QTAX59_20B31

    My 10-year-old son was riding his scooter on our dirt road on our property. He called me from his Gizmo Watch upset, saying his watch had shocked him and it felt like he was burned. He had already taken the watch off by that point. I told him to put it in his pocket and bring it home immediately so I could look at his arm. When he got home, I examined his arm. Where the watch had been, his arm was red, swollen, and had raised welts that look like burn marks. He reported ongoing pain. Injury and care: Redness, swelling, and welts/burn-like marks at watch contact site. Wrapped with clean gauze. Plan to call pediatrician in the morning for evaluation. Photos taken

    Model
    QTAX59 Gizmo Watch 3 Adventure No Camera QTAX59_20
    UPC
    Unknown
    Serial number
    Unknown - see FCC ID HFS-QTAX59
    Bought from
    Verizon
    Bought
    May 27, 2026
    Where
    Richlands, North Carolina: Farm/Ranch
    Who was involved
    Age 10, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  2. No one hurt

    Made Dec 11, 2025, sent to the company Dec 16, 2025, published by CPSC Jan 5, 2026

    The product, in the report: This is a wireless hotspot device, to provide an Internet connection for computers, tablets, phones, or other Internet capable devices. Many users have already reported this unit as a fire hazard, and a class-action lawsuit resulted in a recall of the product. BUT... NONE OF THE VERIZON-ASSOCIATED CONTACT PHONE NUMBERS EVER PROVIDE HELP WHEN SEEKING A REPLACEMENT. Verizon Wireless sold it under SKU: MHS900L, as an *Ellipsis (*spelling might be incorrect) Jetpack. Unit’s case is made of black plastic, and it is physically about the size of a single packaged deck of game playing cards found in many homes in America. My unit’s specific IMEI number was/is [REDACTED] (as stated on the original box’s Proof of Purchase tag).

    My Verizon MHS900L hotspot device severely overheated. The battery swelled and popped the back off of the hotspot device. The unit was purchased in San Angelo, TX, at a Verizon retail store on Sherwood Way. The store said there was no warranty on the battery and offered no assistance, whatsoever, even though the unit was clearly a very serious fire hazard... and the battery possibly could possibly have exploded.

    Model
    MHS900L
    UPC
    00449
    Serial number
    Not Available
    Bought from
    Verizon retail store-San Angelo, TX-Sherwood Way
    Bought
    Feb 14, 2018
    Where
    San Angelo, Texas: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 69, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon Wireless Ellipsis Jetpack, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  3. No one hurt

    Made Apr 28, 2023, sent to the company May 4, 2023, published by CPSC May 18, 2023

    The product, in the report: Verizon cellular WiFi device model MIFI 8800 [REDACTED].

    The battery in a Verizon MIFI 8800 [REDACTED] cellular WiFi sweeps up and overheated. This is the second time this happened. It happened on my first device and also on the replacement device that I had to pay for. Verizon is refusing to do anything g about this hazardous defect.

    Model
    MIFI 8800L
    UPC
    FZ06092 1A27748
    Serial number
    649496024116
    Bought from
    Verizon wireless
    Bought
    Jan 6, 2022
    Where
    Coventry, Connecticut: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 58, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon [REDACTED]model 8800L, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  4. No one hurt

    Made Dec 13, 2022, sent to the company Dec 15, 2022, published by CPSC Dec 30, 2022

    The product, in the report: This modem is used as a phone only in emergency situations. It is a modem I use to connect my elevator to the outside world.

    The Verizon Wireless Home Modem Model Number: LVP2 and S/N: W22A5R00044B burns up batteries. They swell up and get hot and stop the modem from functioning properly. The battery is for back-up. Sounds very similar to [REDACTED] I am on my third battery with the modem since January 2021. Two of them had the swelling and heat issue. I am waiting on the latest one to do the same thing and it is a fire hazard.

    Model
    Model:LVP2
    Serial number
    S/N:W22A5R00044B
    Where
    Kitty Hawk, North Carolina: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unknown
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon Wireless Home Modem, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  5. No one hurt

    Made Jan 21, 2022, sent to the company Apr 1, 2022, published by CPSC Apr 15, 2022

    The product, in the report: mobile hot spot device Verizon 4G Ellipsis Jetpack MHS800L [REDACTED] FCC: ID: -XHG-R800 {roof of purchase [REDACTED]

    Caller stated that she was having trouble connecting the hot spot to her laptop. Caller stated that she went to the provider and the technical support person advised that they would not be able to connect it because the battery may cause a fire. She stated that the person noticed a bulge in the hot spot device which had caused the problem. (Note - spoke w/ six different Verizon Representatives)

    Caller stated that her hot spot is not included in the recall but feels that she experienced similar problem as the recall and that it should be recalled.

    Problem w/ hot spot started August 2021 with transmission failures & continued.

    Model
    [REDACTED]
    Bought from
    Verizon
    Where
    Murrieta, California: Unspecified
    Who was involved
    Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  6. No one hurt

    Made Jul 6, 2021, sent to the company Jul 8, 2021, published by CPSC Jul 22, 2021

    The product, in the report: Verizon Jet Pack MIFI 8800L black and grey oval

    My MIFI 8800L Has over heated and the back is coming off.

    Model
    Jetpack MIFI 8800L
    UPC
    649496024116
    Serial number
    9900093157935101
    Bought from
    Verizon
    Bought
    Jul 2, 2019, about then
    Where
    Ambridge, Pennsylvania: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  7. No incident, no one hurt

    Made Jun 12, 2021, sent to the company Jun 16, 2021, published by CPSC Jul 1, 2021

    The product, in the report: Navy blue ellipsis jetpack mobile hotspot by Verizon about 4 inches long

    Battery swelling on ellipsis jet pack hotspot

    Model
    MHS900L
    Serial number
    356549113695148
    Where
    Esmont, Virginia: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 39, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    No Incident, No Injury
  8. No one hurt

    Made May 25, 2021, sent to the company May 28, 2021, published by CPSC Jun 14, 2021

    The product, in the report: Ellipsis Jetpack mobile hotspot FWC MHS900L, 4G LTE oval shape, black, Item Length: 2.5 inches, Item Height: .5 inches, Item Width: 3.5 inches Model Battery V604454AR / Jetpack Device MHS900L

    FYI-I have a Verizon Ellipse JetPack MHS900LS. The jetpack overheats whenever turned on/activated for use since contract began in August 2020 from Russell Celluar Verizon services in Nashville, Arkansas. I felt intense heat generated by the device to my hand and on my furniture during each usage on the computer or television. The voluntary recall occurred April 2021. Verizon never took responsibility to notify me of the recall and I continued usage until May 17, 2021, when the jetpack automatically turned itself off. Even after calling for tech support, I was not informed of the recall. I discovered by chance that a recall occurred while looking for contact information to discuss inability to receive service. I spoke to Verizon on one other occasion, again no notice made of the recall in the conversation. Verizon nor the Indirect location(Russell Celluar of Nashville, Arkansas) informed me of a recall.

    Model
    Battery V604454AR / Jetpack Device MHS900L
    Serial number
    JPack-IMEI354147089359120 and Battery 200430062992
    Bought from
    Russel Cellular,
    Bought
    Aug 4, 2020
    Where
    Fort Worth, United States: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 71, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon Ellipsis Jetpack, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  9. No one hurt

    Made May 25, 2021, sent to the company May 28, 2021, published by CPSC Jun 14, 2021

    The product, in the report: This product is an Ellipsis Jetpack 900L model.

    The battery in the jetpack began to swell tremendously and is experiencing overheating.

    Where
    Lexington, Virginia: Industrial
    Who was involved
    Unknown
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  10. No one hurt

    Made May 21, 2021, sent to the company May 26, 2021, published by CPSC Jun 17, 2021

    The product, in the report: Verizon jetpack Hotspot does not work and had a recall on it

    Jetpack I purchased will not work has a recall on it

    Bought from
    Verizon. Com
    Bought
    Feb 18, 2021, about then
    Where
    Munford, Tennessee: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  11. No one hurt

    Made Apr 16, 2021, sent to the company Apr 21, 2021, published by CPSC May 5, 2021

    The product, in the report: The product is Verizon’s Ellipsis Jetpack WiFi Hotspot. According to my Verizon purchase history, I purchased it new from Aliso Viejo, CA Verizon store on Jun 2018. It is a small gadget (3.5”x2.25”) and is black & dark grey. It recently HAS BEEN RECALLED. The recall # is 21-106. Model FWCR900TVL, DC151030 UPC 311480424829231

    I noticed my Ellipsis Jetpack got rather hot when in use. Then recently there was a slight bulge to the unit and it got extremely hot. I knew this was a very bad sign for a Li Ion batt since I’m an informed consumer and also am a retired Flight Attendant, so I’m aware of the serious hazard this represents on the airplane. Even tho’ I really needed to use it, I turned it off and ordered a new batt on [REDACTED] once our provider reinstated our signal. We had lost WiFi in south central Texas due to our severe cold weather and terrible unprecedented snowstorm in Feb 2021.

    Model
    FWCR900TVL, DC151030
    UPC
    311480424829231
    Serial number
    IMEI #358046085989235
    Bought from
    Verizon Store, Alicia Pkwy, Aliso Viejo, Ca
    Bought
    Jun 11, 2018
    Where
    Georgetown, Texas: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 76, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  12. No one hurt

    Made Apr 12, 2021, sent to the company Apr 14, 2021, published by CPSC Apr 28, 2021

    The product, in the report: Ellipsis JetPack MHS900L Black

    I have been using Verizon Ellipsis Jetpacks for quite a few years. I am on my 3rd one, having paid for all 3, that now the battery is swelling, again!!!. I have been luck, no burns or fires but the battery swells enough to make the Jetpack useless and I have had to go buy another. I was about to have to purchase another, when the recall came out.

    Model
    V604454AR
    Serial number
    190713016561
    Bought from
    Verizon Factory Store
    Bought
    Mar 9, 2020
    Where
    Clearwater, Florida: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand VERIZON Ellipsis JetPack, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  13. No incident, no one hurt

    Made Apr 9, 2021, sent to the company Apr 13, 2021, published by CPSC Apr 27, 2021

    The product, in the report: Verizon Ellipsis MHS900L Hotspot

    We have hundreds of these Verizon Ellipsis MHS900L hotspots in our Corp environment. We have had to replace over a dozen with ‘swelled’ batteries. Luckily no damage or injuries have occurred so far. Users use these as their main internet so they are plugged in and turned on during the work day

    Model
    MHS900L
    UPC
    850011004494
    Serial number
    We have hundreds of these
    Bought from
    Directly from Verizon Wireless
    Bought
    Apr 1, 2020
    Where
    Northfield, Illinois: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Client, Patient, Student, Etc. (professional relationship)
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    No Incident, No Injury
  14. No one hurt

    Made Feb 3, 2021, sent to the company Mar 25, 2021, published by CPSC Apr 8, 2021

    The product, in the report: Booster internet pack Model: MiFi8800L inseego Brand: Verizon

    I tried to report a potentially unsafe product (i.e., a Verizon MiFi 8800l inseego, Model MIFI8800L, using Lithium Battery VK Model 160002). We had two reports at [REDACTED] of the batteries swelling. We have 17 total MiFis but only two are Verizon MiFi 8800l inseego, Model MIFI8800L. The other 15 which are different Makes/Models were fine. Swelled batteries were only reported in the two Verizon MiFi 8800l inseego, Model MIFI8800L.

    Model
    MiFi8800L inseego
    Where
    Crane, Indiana: Other
    Who was involved
    Unknown
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Inseego Corp
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  15. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Dec 16, 2020, sent to the company Jan 8, 2021, published by CPSC Jan 26, 2021

    The product, in the report: Verizon USB Data Cable 6 Ft for USB-C for charging Model CAB6FTCTOA-M1 DC191007 (L)

    On Sepetember 30, 2020, I went to a Verizon Corporate store in Santa Monica, California and purchased a Verizon brand USB-C cable to charge my phone. I showed the representative my device and it was confirmed that the cable I was purchasing was compatible with my device, and the two charging ports I intended to use. After using the cable for the last two months, on the evening of Sunday December 13, 2020, my phone was plugged into this cable, charging, while I held my phone in my lap. I started to hear a crackling sound and felt extreme heat in my hand, and immediatly dropped the phone on the chair and unplugged the charger from the wall, and then from my phone. There was smoke and a burning plastic smell coming from the end of the cable, and the charging port in my phone was damaged. I know with absolute certainty, that it was the cable that caused this. I tested other cables using different charging stations and different outlets in my home after this transpired; none of the other cables or products replicated this reaction. I tested the Verizon cable again, in a different outlet in my home, and once again, it started to spark, smoke, and produced a melted subtance from its metal end, which I believe is from the coating it melted off of the charging port in my phone. It also permanently damaged the charging port of my phone, in the first instance, which is visibly noticible. The following day, I returned to the store where I purchased the cable, with my phone and cable, and reported what happened to an employee named [REDACTED]. He refused the need to inspect my phone, nor the cable and was very unphased and unconcerned. I held up both the cable and my phone, in front of the representatives face, and he would barely look. He told me to call Customer Service, and that there was nothing that could be done in store. I didn’t want to argue and remain in the store, because they were not honoring social distancing guidelines and had between 10 and 11 people in the small store, so I left. I returned home and called customer service as directed. I spoke with someone named [REDACTED] and explained what happened. [REDACTED] told me that I had to go into a store to resolve this, even though I told her I had already done this the previous day. I asked to speak with a Supervisor and I was denied the opportunity to talk with a Supervisor, and was told that a Supervisor would call me back---one never did, even over 24 hours later. I called again after ending the call with [REDACTED], due to the time sensitive nature, and spoke with a representative name [REDACTED], explained what happened, and asked to speak with a Supervisor. I recieved a call back from supervisor named [REDACTED] within a couple minutes. [REDACTED] was the 4th Verizon rep who was made aware of what happened, and I explained everything again in detail. I asked [REDACTED] multiple times if I could give him the information from my receipt as well as the product information, and expressed to him that it was a grave safety concern that they look into this. [REDACTED] refused to listen when I tried to read him the information, and would not take the information identifying the product or my purchase. He simply agreed to remove the cost of the charger from next month’s bill. Meanwhile, after I said I would be taking legal action, [REDACTED] gave me a big spiel about how he was going to open an investigation into the product and said that Verizon takes this very seriously, and that they would be looking into this; and yet, he had no idea what the exact product was or what the serial number was, because he said that he couldn’t find the receipt, and again, would not take down the information. This is all on a recorded line. All of the Verizon reps seemed unphased by the safety implications of this situation, even refusing to ackowledge it. At no point, did anyone ask me for the serial number or identifying number of the product, and everyone I spoke to, including in the store, claimed that they couldn’t find my receipt, even though I currently have a copy that they emailed to me, directly from Verizon, as well as my bank statement, and I’m sure I was also filmed on a security camera in store as well. Aside from the fact that [REDACTED] wouldn’t take the information from me to identify the product, I have a strong reason to believe that [REDACTED] did not actually file any such safety investigation. One example of [REDACTED] dishonesty, is that he also stated and promised other things on our call that he was being dishonest about (i.e. he told me multiple times, on a recorded line, that he was notating my account to indicate that Verizon would refund the insurance deductable for the phone that I had to replace as a result of their faulty cable, but when I called back today, 12/16/2020, at [REDACTED], the representative I spoke to, [REDACTED], stated that [REDACTED] noted my account to say that he could not refund the deductable---demonstrating that he is a dishonest liar). I then asked to be transferred to a supervisor to confirm, and was transferred to a supervisor named [REDACTED]. In speaking [REDACTED], I explained the entire ordeal again, and I told her I would be filing a formal safety complaint with a federal agency, and contacting an attorney regarding the monetary losses I incurred as a result (i.e. my phone), since Verizon lied and told me in bad faith, that they would refund the insurance deductible on my next bill, if I filed the insurance claim with their insurance carrier [REDACTED], which is what I did. [REDACTED] responded and said that she would call me back within 20 minutes, before leaving for the day at 7:00 pm pst, in order to “find out how she could help me”. It is now 8:10 pm pst, and [REDACTED] never called me; when I had tried to call Verizon at 7:04, the automated system says they are now closed. I tried to post a negative review of the cable on the verizon website, warning others about the fire hazard, and Verizon would not allow my review to post to their website which I documented as well. Verizon is putting people’s lives at risk. And three phone calls and a visit to the store has yielded zero concern or action to investigate. I’m lucky that I was awake when this happened or this would be a very different conversation, if I could have one at all. All it takes is for one spark to start a fire that could permanently maim or kill somebody, and I feel incredibly gratefu that I was awake, to prevent that from happening.

    I would like to add an additional update to my report, to say that I made another attempt to contact Verizon today, 12/17, since I never recieved the promised Supervisor call back from [REDACTED]. I spoke with [REDACTED], and then [REDACTED] (Supervisor), and was again, denied the opportunity to escalate this case to an upper manager. [REDACTED] refused to listen to the previous phone calls, and did not take the information that identifies the faulty cable, even when I re-explained what happened and re-iterated that they STILL have not documented the information that identifies the cable. I reiterated that they have a duty to protect their consumers and [REDACTED] did not collect any information about the cable. [REDACTED] also refused to provide me with the legal address of their legal department, where I said I wanted to send a certified letter. and said that I had to subpeona this information. I had to look it up myself on the internet. Verizon is trying to brush this off and are endangering people’s lives.

    Model
    CAB6FTCTOA-M1 DC191007 (L)
    Serial number
    Unknown
    Bought from
    Verizon Corporate Store, 2530 WILSHIRE BLVD
    Bought
    Sep 30, 2020
    Where
    United States: Unspecified
    Who was involved
    Age 31, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Verizon, made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  16. Hurt, care not known

    Made Jun 19, 2015, sent to the company Aug 25, 2015, published by CPSC Sep 9, 2015

    The product, in the report: Actiontec - Internet Router Tested to comply with FCC standard for Home and Office use 47 CFR Part 68 FCC ID: ONQGT784WN

    The consumer stated that the router gets hot when it’s turned on. The consumer stated that the plastic that the router is made out of is toxic and is releasing those toxic chemicals into the air. The consumer believes she is breathing in phthalates and formaldehyde. There is a strong odor present as soon as the router gets hot (soon after turning it on).

    The consumer contacted Verizon about the issue with the router and spoke to two representatives. The consumer stated that she has not e-mailed the company.

    Prior to this router, about a year or two ago, she had received a router from Verizon that presented the same hazard. The consumer contacted Verizon about the issue and they informed her that they will send out a different, replacement router. The replacement the consumer received is the same router with same hazards.

    The consumer stated that she started getting a migraine from the newer router when she initially received it about a year or two ago. The consumer stated that the odor on the older router was present for 3 months before it died down. The consumer had to walk out of the room for some time to get a relief. The consumer stated that she felt better when she moved away from the router.

    Model
    GT784WNV
    UPC
    Unknown
    Serial number
    CREA5140310137
    Bought from
    Verizon
    Bought
    Jun 15, 2015
    Where
    Santa Barbara, California: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 53, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    made or sold by Verizon
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Computers and video games

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.