Inmo computers and video games
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Apr 16, 2026. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Apr 16, 2026the latest report was made
- Apr 16, 2026the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Inmo
- Maker
- Shenzhen Yingmu Technology Co., Ltd. dba INMOMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Computers and video gamesComputers, their equipment and electronic gamesCPSC’s product type: Computers (Equipment and Electronic Games) (code 557), in Electronics: Computers, Monitors, Projectors
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| April 2026 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- First aid 1 CPSC: Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
First aid Made Apr 16, 2026, sent to the company Apr 24, 2026, published by CPSC May 8, 2026
The product, in the report: Wearable Electronics / Smart Glasses - INMO AIR3 (Model: IMA301) FCC ID: 2BP9S-IMA301 Manufacturer: Shenzhen Inmo Technology Co., Ltd. / Sichuan Yingmu Technology Co., Ltd.
Scalding risks
I am filing a formal complaint regarding the INMO AIR3 smart glasses due to a severe overheating, burn, and potential fire hazard. During normal operation, the arm of the glasseswhere the battery and internal electronics are housedreaches scalding temperatures. I have captured thermal imaging showing the surface of the device reaching 153.0F (67.2C). This temperature is significantly above safe limits for skin contact and presents an immediate risk of severe thermal burns. Furthermore, given the extreme heat generation, I am deeply concerned about the risk of the internal lithium-ion battery experiencing thermal runaway, which could lead to an ignition or explosion directly next to the user’s face and eyes. The manufacturer’s own documentation explicitly warns that overheating “may damage the device, cause battery swelling/leakage, or even explosion,” indicating the catastrophic nature of this hazard. 3. Inadequate Manufacturer Mitigation It appears the manufacturer is already aware of this dangerous thermal issue. The product design includes an aftermarket-style foam sticker placed along the inner arm of the glasses, exactly where the heat is concentrated and where the device rests against the wearer’s head. This foam strip appears to be a superficial attempt to insulate the user from the extreme heat rather than engineering a safe thermal management system or addressing the underlying electrical fault. This mitigation is entirely inadequate for a device reaching 153.0F and fails to protect consumers from the severe burn risks. 4. User Vulnerability and Context of Use I utilize these smart glasses as an assistive device due to nerve damage that impairs my hearing and physical sensation. Because my physical sensation is diminished, I am at a significantly higher risk for severe, deep-tissue burn injuries, as my body cannot rely on standard pain reflexes to detect the escalating heat of the device against my skin. Wearable technologies must adhere to strict thermal safety limits, particularly because they are frequently used by vulnerable populations who may not immediately perceive thermal hazards. 5. Requested Action I urge the CPSC to investigate the INMO AIR3 smart glasses for severe thermal and fire hazards. The manufacturer’s apparent awareness of the issueevidenced by the application of an insulating foam stickerwithout issuing a recall or properly addressing the thermal failure is highly concerning. I request that the CPSC evaluate this device for a potential mandatory recall to prevent serious burns, battery ignitions, or facial injuries to other consumers.
- Model
- Inmo air 3
- UPC
- 2BP9S-IMA301
- Serial number
- 2BP9S-IMA301
- Bought from
- Amazon
- Bought
- Jan 31, 2026
- Where
- Greenwood Village, Colorado: Unspecified
- Who was involved
- Age 49, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Inmo, made or sold by Shenzhen Yingmu Technology Co., Ltd. dba INMO
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.