Felt mountain or all-terrain bicycles and accessories
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Sep 23, 2015. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Sep 23, 2015the latest report was made
- Sep 23, 2015the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Felt
- Maker
- Felt BicyclesMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Mountain or all-terrain bicycles and accessoriesCPSC’s product type: Mountain or All-terrain Bicycles and Accessories (code 5033), in Sports and Recreation: Cycling, Scooters, Skateboards & Skates
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| September 2015 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Sep 23, 2015, sent to the company Dec 16, 2015, published by CPSC Feb 10, 2016
The product, in the report: Mountain Bike Size: Medium Frame Style: Carbon Fiber Mountain Bike Frame
The consumer stated that his son was riding around a bike course with his brother, at approximately 10-15 mph. They rode down the hill, and when the hill swept back up again, the downtube and toptube frame on his son’s bike broke off.
The consumer’s son was ejected from the bike and fell on his head. The consumer’s son was examined by the paramedic on the scene.
The consumer’s son injured his neck and was diagnosed with whiplash. The consumer’s son suffered from whiplash until recently (for about month and half). He also had a black eye.
The consumer’ son was wearing a helmet which cracked when he fell on his head.
The consumer contacted the dealer regarding the incident. The dealer took photos of the frame and submitted the information to Felt. The dealer informed the consumer that Felt will offer frame replacement for $500. The consumer informed the dealer that he does not feel that he should have to pay for this. He asked the dealer to contact Felt and have them examine the bike. The consumer sent the bike to Felt and paid $50 for shipping. After examining the bike, Felt offered the consumer frame replacement for $250. The consumer was not informed what happened to the frame. The consumer asked to have the engineers look at the frames closely to find out what caused it to break. After the engineers examined the bike, Felt offered to have the frames replaced for $594. Felts informed the consumer that the engineers looked at the frame and found nothing structurally wrong with it.
After that, the consumer contacted Felt directly. The consumer was informed that the frame functioned as structurally designed and that there was no flaw in the frame. The consumer informed Felt that he does not feel comfortable purchasing another frame that can function and break in the same way after a few months of use. The consumer asked for his money back. Felt informed the consumer that they don’t issue refunds directly and that he would have to contact the dealer.
The consumer contacted the dealer and asked for a refund. The consumer was informed by the dealer that Felt would not issue a refund through them so they would not be able to provide it.
The consumer stated that they were not at fault for why the frame broke, and they should not have to pay for replacement frames The consumer is apprehensive about purchasing another frame and would rather get a refund.
The consumer has been having a lot of communication issues with the dealer.
The consumer’s son weighs 120 pounds and is about 5’6” tall.
- Model
- NINE 1
- UPC
- Unknown
- Serial number
- Unknown
- Bought from
- VO2 Multisport, Kentucky
- Bought
- May 15, 2015, about then
- Where
- Lexington, Kentucky: Place of Recreation or Sports
- Who was involved
- Age 13, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand Felt, made or sold by Felt Bicycles
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.