Hearth Record

Back to Toy vehicles

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus toy vehicles

1 report to CPSC, the latest made May 15, 2014. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • May 15, 2014the latest report was made
  • May 15, 2014the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus
Maker
DJI Technology LLCMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Toy vehiclesNot riding toysCPSC’s product type: Toy Vehicles (Excluding Riding Toys) (code 5021), in Toys & Children: Toys

By month

1 report from June 2013 to May 2014; the most in May 2014, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
May 20141

How badly anyone was hurt

  • First aid 1 CPSC: Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. First aid

    Made May 15, 2014, sent to the company May 23, 2014, published by CPSC Jun 9, 2014

    The product, in the report: Remote Control Toy Helicopter

    I received the DJI Phanton 2 Vision+ on May 7, 2014. The marketing videos on the website suggest that this could be operated by anyone. However, I believe that the product is not ready for market and is unsafe for untrained users.

    The accompanying manual suggests that I should check the training videos to prepare. However, the company website does not actually provide any training video. The only video that was available described how to unpack the product. That video refers to a follow up video which does not actually exist on the website.

    Despite the initial challenges and lack of available training, I went into the street to fly the device, having flown other toy helicopters with my son. After several attempts I was able to start the helicopter. I have flown several toy helicopters, but what happened next was shocking. When I started to fly the helicopter, it tilted towards me and the blades struck me in the leg and foot. n trying to push the device away from me, it also cut my finger. One of my children that was watching this ordeal was almost struck in the face. Fortunately, the helicopter missed them and struck me before slamming into the road. The blades which were not touching the ground kept spinning. Not knowing how to turn off the device I tried to move the controllers in various directions which resulted in the helicopter moving around more, with additional cuts on my hand.

    In summary, I was really looking forward to playing with this new toy, but clearly this device is untended for well-trained professionals only. I received cuts on five parts of my body from the sharp unprotected blades.

    Model
    Phantom 2 Vision Plus
    Serial number
    PT645202399
    Bought from
    website
    Bought
    Apr 30, 2014
    Where
    Austin, Texas: Street or Highway
    Who was involved
    Age 44, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus, made or sold by DJI Technology LLC
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Toy vehicles

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.