Dream Dazzlers pretend-play toys
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Jul 13, 2011. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Jul 13, 2011the latest report was made
- Jul 13, 2011the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Dream Dazzlers
- Maker
- Toy’s R UsMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Pretend-play toysToy electronics, tools, housewares and appliancesCPSC’s product type: Pretend Electronics, Tools, Housewares & Appliances (code 5020), in Toys & Children: Toys
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| July 2011 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made Jul 13, 2011, published by CPSC Aug 4, 2011
The product, in the report: Dream Dazzlers Fun Princess Phone
I purchased the Dream Dazzlers Fun Princess Phone from Toys R Us for my 3, almost 4-year-old daughter the other day. The phone cord broke while she was playing with it and I told her I would try to fix it somehow and to place it on her dresser. Today, I walked into her bedroom and found her on top of her brother’s bunk bed, with the cord in her hands, tied into a NOOSE and she was attempting to place it over her head and around her neck. I immediately cut the cord off but let her keep the phone since there’s nothing else wrong I could find fault with in the phone. I’m very disturbed that a toy, labeled safe for a child 3 years and over could be manipulated in such a way that almost hurt my daughter. I think this phone should be designed differently, preferably without a cord, or with a cord made differently. Perhaps shorter?
- Bought from
- Toys R Us
- Bought
- Jul 11, 2011
- Where
- Mount Laurel, New Jersey: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 3, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand Dream Dazzlers, made or sold by Toy’s R Us
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.