Fingerhut chairs
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Jun 28, 2012. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Jun 28, 2012the latest report was made
- Jun 28, 2012the earliest
- 1with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Fingerhut
- Maker
- FingerhutMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- ChairsChairs without a type of their ownCPSC’s product type: Chairs, Other or Not Specified (code 4074), in Furniture, Furnishings & Decorations: Furniture
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| June 2012 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made Jun 28, 2012, sent to the company Jul 31, 2012, published by CPSC Aug 14, 2012
The product, in the report: Patio set (chair) 6 piece set
The consumer stated that the chair was marketed as a “retro tulip metal chair.” The consumer stated that she was sitting on the 1 of the chairs from the set and she reach over to get something and the chair collapse sideways. The consumer stated that she was sitting on the chair for approximately 2 minutes before it collapse.
The consumer stated that she was not injured.
The consumer stated that she believe the way the chair was made poses a safety a falling hazard to the consumer. The consumer stated that she believe this product should be investigated. The consumer stated that the chair those not provide enough support for an adult to sit on the chair.
The consumer stated that she contacted the retailer and she informed them that she wanted to return the product due to the incident that she experienced. The consumer stated that the retailer was refusing to provide her with the necessary service for her to return the product.
The consumer stated that she followed the direction provided by the retailer on how to return the product. The consumer stated that all though she followed the directions the company was not assisting her.
- Model
- Unknown
- UPC
- 4PA7470000010
- Serial number
- Unknown
- Bought from
- Fingerhut
- Bought
- May 26, 2012, about then
- Where
- Clinton, Tennessee: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- Brand Fingerhut, made or sold by Fingerhut
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.