Hearth Record

Back to Electric wiring

PET SAFE electric wiring

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Aug 20, 2012. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Aug 20, 2012the latest report was made
  • Aug 20, 2012the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
None given: no report names a brand, so the group is named for its maker, PET SAFE
Maker
PET SAFEMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Electric wiringNot panel boards or outletsCPSC’s product type: Electric Wire or Wiring Systems (Excl Panelboards Recept (code 4062), in Home Maintenance and Structures: Electrical Systems

By month

1 report from September 2011 to August 2012; the most in August 2012, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
August 20121

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Aug 20, 2012, sent to the company Oct 5, 2012, published by CPSC Oct 22, 2012

    The product, in the report: Invisible Fence

    On June 22, 2012 lightning hit two trees bout 200’ from the building I had converted from a barn to a recreation room and workshop. The trees were near my Invisible Fence buried a couple feet away. That fence conducted the lightning to my building. Within minutes, there was heavy smoke coming from the peak of the barn. The building was a total loss. $25,067 of the replacement value of $79,207 was covered by insurance. The depreciated value of the building was $59,120. The Fire Marshall, [REDACTED], who is a former fire chief with Eagleville and was a fire officer at UCONN did a thorough investigation. He concluded that the fire had started at the spot where the Invisible Fence was plugged into an outlet and that the Invisible Fence was the cause of the fire. I enclose a copy of the Fire Marshall’s report. A few days later, a representative from Canine Fence who sold and installed my fence, also looked at the building, the scarred trees, and so forth. Their representative acknowledged that the cause of the fire was the Invisible Fence his company had installed. [REDACTED] of Canine Fence says that Canine Fence has no responsibility for what happened. I disagree for the following reasons: 1) Nowhere in the installation manual and owner’s guide is there indication that having an Invisible Fence connected to a building puts that building in danger from lightning. I enclose a copy of the installation manual. I mentioned this to [REDACTED]. His response was that it is “common knowledge” that buried wires can conduct lightning into buildings, so I should have known. I have done some informal research, asking various acquaintances whether they were aware that buried wires could do this. Out of ten people eight of them were surprised and amazed. This is not common knowledge, although I’m sure it is obvious to people installing buried wires. 2) After my event a friend who also has an Invisible Fence told me that the men who installed the system advised him to unplug the charger when there was an electrical storm. So, the installers are aware that lightning is a danger to the building in which the charger is plugged in. If the installers were aware of this, it seems that those writing the warnings on the installation manual were aware of this as well. In any case, I was not given that bit of advice. This is not a rare occurrence. I am aware of at least one other event just like mine that happened in Columbia about a week after my building was destroyed. A quick [REDACTED] search finds many more such events, some of them captured on [REDACTED] videos. 3) There are plenty of warnings on other topics in the installation manual. The only warning about lightning, however, is that an electrical storm may damage the buried wire, so that one should check the perimeter of the fence after a storm. There in not word about fire danger to one’s building. 4) A company that sells a product has a responsibility to inform buyers of a product of dangers associated with the product. Drugs, pesticides, and almost every other product come with appropriate warnings. In the present case it is pretty clear that Canine Fence was well aware that their product involved this danger. They have a responsibility to let customers know of this danger. I should re-iterate that everyone Invisible Fence owner I have spoken to has been surprised and frightened. 5) The “common knowledge” excuse for not informing me doesn’t hold up. When you buy coffee, the cup says “contents may be hot.” Well, duh! Even if it were “common knowledge” that buried wires connected to buildings can burn them down, that should be in the literature among the other warnings. 6) I live on top of a hill, in an obviously lightning-prone location. My House and out-buildings are the highest point for hundreds of yards in every direction. I had lightning rods on the building which burned down, and I have lightning rods on my house. Canine Fence has to know that installing an Invisible Fence in this location is exceptionally dangerous. So, my opinion is: 1) Canine Fence should be required to warn past purchaser and potential future purchasers of this “common knowledge” fact that installing an Invisible Fence could conduct lightning into the building into which it is plugged and burn it down. 2) Given that Canine Fence was well aware of the problem with their dog containment device, and continued to sell their installations without any warning, some kind of fine should be imposed on the company. This situation akin to the tobacco companies covering up the dangers of smoking and to Ford ignoring the dangers of their Pinto. It is beyond belief that their installers knew about the danger and the management of the company did not. 3) Canine Fence should compensate burnt: owners who suffer fire losses due to their product. At least up to the depreciated value of the destroyed property.

    Sincerely [REDACTED]

    Model
    1CT725 transmitter
    Where
    Willington, Connecticut: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    made or sold by PET SAFE
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Electric wiring

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.