Hearth Record

Back to Non-electric blankets

Dissero Brands Ltd non-electric blankets

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Jun 28, 2013. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Jun 28, 2013the latest report was made
  • Jun 28, 2013the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
None given: no report names a brand, so the group is named for its maker, Dissero Brands Ltd
Maker
Dissero Brands LtdMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Non-electric blanketsCPSC’s product type: Nonelectric Blankets (code 4008), in Furniture, Furnishings & Decorations: Bedroom, Bedding & Bath

By month

1 report from July 2012 to June 2013; the most in June 2013, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
June 20131

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Not said 1 CPSC: Unspecified

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Not said

    Made Jun 28, 2013, sent to the company Jul 9, 2013, published by CPSC Jul 30, 2013

    The product, in the report: The tag didn’t have much information other than the brand name & a sticker on the hang tag that said precious puppy baby but when I looked it up online I found out it was called Precious Puppy Baby Sleep Sack; the label says polyester but it feels like velour & it’s blue. This web link is not for the exact item but it is the same size 6-12 months) and design; the text under the features tab shows that is is designed to be worn primarily for sleeping by children & that it definitely is not tight fitting as does the picture: http://www.kidmart.co.uk/halo-sleepsack-wearable-blanket-velboa-cream-6-12m/ (the brand in the link is flame retardant)

    I purchased a baby sleep sack for a cousin’s baby and when I was looking at the tag I noticed it said “keep away from flames” and that concerned me because I thought children’s bed clothes were supposed to be flame retardant. I looked online and what I found said that all sleepwear for children ages 9 months to 14 years old had to be. The item in question is for ages 6-12 months so I wasn’t sure if it might apply to it, but I did also see that sleepwear for children under 9 months is only exempt if it is a two piece garment with no piece longer than 15.75 inches or a one piece garment no longer than 25.75 inches. It is a one piece garment and it looked longer than what was mentioned so I measured it and it was 34 inches long.

    I thought that part of the problem might be that manufactures might not see a sleep sack as a garment since technically it is not a nightgown, pajama, robe or loungewear but it intended to be worn primarily for sleeping or activities related to sleeping & meets all 3 criteria that the CPSC uses to determine if the item is sleepwear (nature of item/suitability for sleeping, how it’s promoted/distributed, & the likelihood it will be used by children primarily for sleeping).

    The item was purchased from a store called Tuesday Morning but I am unsure of the exact location (it was one in the St Louis, MO metropolitan area), the tag says that it was made in China for a brand called Rachael Hale.

    Bought from
    Tuesday Morning, Missouri
    Bought
    Jun 18, 2013, about then
    Where
    euless, Texas: Other
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand unsure, made or sold by Dissero Brands Ltd
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Unspecified

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Non-electric blankets

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.