Hearth Record

Back to Exercise equipment

Teeter EZ-Up Gravity Boots exercise equipment

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Feb 8, 2017. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Feb 8, 2017the latest report was made
  • Feb 8, 2017the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Teeter EZ-Up Gravity Boots
Maker
TEETER HANGUPMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Exercise equipmentCPSC’s product type: Exercise Equipment (code 3277), in Sports and Recreation: Track, Field & Exercise

By month

1 report from March 2016 to February 2017; the most in February 2017, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
February 20171

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Feb 8, 2017, sent to the company Feb 21, 2017, published by CPSC Mar 14, 2017

    The product, in the report: One pair of Teeter EZ-Up Gravity Boots--used in conjunction with Teeter inversion table. Boots in question can be seen on manufacturer’s site at: http://teeter.com/Shop/Doorway-Inversion/EZ-Up-Gravity-Boots.html#.WJt6cX8WmPU

    After 7 years of owning a pair of Teeter EZ-Up Gravity Boots, purchased online along with a [REDACTED] Sport Inversion Table on 10 January 2010, all four fastening ratchet straps on the boots broke on the same day, 3 Feb 2017, as I was trying to tighten them, one after the other. I’m glad I wasn’t hanging upside down when this breakage occurred. I sporadically use my Teeter inversion table and boots, far from on a daily basis, and haven’t abused the equipment. Over the 7 years of ownership, I’ve probably used the table no more than 50 or so times. Other than the straps breaking, the boots are in excellent condition and so is the table. No cracked plastic on the boots (other than the straps). No decaying foam liner on the boots. Points where the straps attach appear fine. The straps are easily removed. They simply slide out. I searched online for replacement straps available for purchase but found none. I finally called Teeter customer service on 8 Feb 2017 as a follow-up to an online problem report I filed with Teeter on 5 Feb 2017 about the strap breakage.

    The Teeter customer rep I spoke with on 8 Feb 2017 was polite enough, but reminded me of the 5 year warranty and my boots being out of warranty. She told me I would have to send the boots in at my own expense, and the straps would be replaced at no cost. I asked her if straps could be sent to me instead, as I could easily insert them myself at connection point. She said that’s against company policy due to potential liability issues if something else is wrong with the boots. I politely declined the send in repair offer as I do not wish to incur the cost of shipping.

    If these straps were made out of more durable plastic, perhaps a [synthetic fiber] mix, or were partially constructed of metal, the straps might not have dry rotted/snapped. As is and based on my breakage experience, the strap design material, prone to dry rot and breakage, poses a potential danger to the consumer after x amount of years and/or x amount of boot usage. Alternative, non-Teeter boots exist on the market that appear to be of better construction, at least when it comes to connection/tightening methods, and that’s what I will pursue.

    Based on other Teeter boot owners who have posted negative online reviews of these boots due to strap breakage (amazon.com is one good source for these particular reviews), sometimes when the owner was hanging upside down on the table (my strap breakage is not a fluke), these boots appear to have a serious design flaw when it comes to the plastic strap fastening method. I suggest either changing the strap material to something more durable, or redesigning and implementing a hardier and more trustworthy connection/tightening system. At very least, Teeter should offer price friendly replacement straps for sale, especially to those of us for whom the warranty has run out, versus the owner having to send the boots to Teeter for strap replacement---something just about any owner of the boots could easily do him or herself. Also, at least based on my research, Teeter does not mention any potential danger of strap breakage in the product’s instructions or other information or otherwise recommend the straps be replaced after a given period of service.

    Model
    Teeter EZ-Up Gravity Boots SKU: #B11001
    Bought from
    betterhealthinnovations.com, Pennsylvania
    Bought
    Jan 10, 2010
    Where
    Stuart, Florida: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Teeter EZ-Up Gravity Boots, made or sold by TEETER HANGUP
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Exercise equipment

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.