Reebok exercise equipment
2 reports to CPSC, the latest made Feb 19, 2015. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 2reports to CPSC
- Feb 19, 2015the latest report was made
- May 12, 2011the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Reebok
- Maker
- ICON HEALTH & FITNESSMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Exercise equipmentCPSC’s product type: Exercise Equipment (code 3277), in Sports and Recreation: Track, Field & Exercise
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| February 2015 | 1 |
| May 2011 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
- Hurt, no treatment 1 CPSC: Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Feb 19, 2015, sent to the company Mar 13, 2019, published by CPSC Mar 27, 2019
The product, in the report: Exercise machine (Inversion Table)
Consumer stated that the inversion table that is used to lock the bar to her ankle, the foot mechanism released and shot her to the floor. causing her to receive abrasions to her buttocks. She was unable to sit flat because her tail bone hurt severely. No medical attention was received at the time. She visited her physician later for a check up and there was no diagnostic of illness from this incident.
Consumer stated that if this had gone differently it could have caused severe injuries or fatality.
The manufacturer was not contacted as yet.
Consumer feels that this product is unsafe and should be recalled.
- Model
- RBBE2057.0
- Serial number
- w20f01265
- Where
- Unspecified: Unspecified
- Who was involved
- Age 64, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Reebok, made or sold by ICON HEALTH & FITNESS
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
-
Hurt, no treatment Made May 12, 2011, published by CPSC Jun 10, 2011
The product, in the report: Reebok RL 1500 Elliptical
I had previously filed a complaint under IDI [REDACTED] for an elliptical manufactured by Icon Fitness. In response to my complaint, and subsequent report completed by the CPSC, Bearson and Peck Attorneys at law (who represent ICON Fitness) wrote a letter to the CPSC in response to the complaint that was filed under IDI [REDACTED]. I would like to provide comment sdirectly to the points made in this letter in hopes that additional investigation will be made into the elliptical. In the letter, Bearnson & Peck indicated that the elliptical machine was approximately three years old; however, at the time the elliptical broke it was just over 2 years old.
In the letter Bearnson & Peck stated that the elliptical was stored in an unfinished basement with concrete floors and that it is not uncommon for concrete floors to be uneven that may weaken the elliptical’s weld. I have taken photos in which I have placed a level in front of the broken elliptical, which is still in our basement. The level indicates that the basement floor is NOT uneven as was suggested by the attorneys.
In the letter Bearnson & Peck have said that no other external factors have been ruled out and that misuse or failure to appropriate follow any instruction sheets are potentially contributing factors. Both my wife and I, the main users of the elliptical, both read and understood the directions of use. We have also been using similar equipment for many years without issue.
Finally the letter stated that injury did not result from this occurrence. However, I think a clarification needs to be made. When I used the elliptical and it failed, I fell off of the elliptical tweaking my ankle and hitting my arm on the elliptical. An injury did result from the product failure. However, at the time, I did not deem the injury to be severe enough to warrant medical attention. However, it should be noted that one of my main concerns is that should have someone older or less fit been on this elliptical or a similar product that a more serious injury could have occurred. From my understanding of the regulations, CPSC has the right to address products that have an “unreasonable risk of serious injury”. The issue related to this product could result in an “unreasonable risk of serious injury”. So, this product resulted in an injury to me, although not one that required me to seek medical attention, and could present an “unreasonable risk of serious” injury to others.
Please contact me for further information
Kind regards,
[REDACTED]
- Model
- RBEL4255.0
- Serial number
- V77G00697
- Bought from
- MC Sporting Goods, Michigan
- Bought
- Nov 4, 2007
- Where
- Chelsea, Michigan: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 35, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Reebok, made or sold by ICON HEALTH & FITNESS
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.