Bradley grills, kind not given
2 reports to CPSC, the latest made Jan 23, 2013. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 2reports to CPSC
- Jan 23, 2013the latest report was made
- Dec 30, 2011the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Bradley
- Maker
- BRADLEY TECHNOLOGIES CANADA INCMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Grills, kind not givenCPSC’s product type: Grills, Not Specified (code 3249), in Yard & Garden: Grills & Accessories
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| January 2013 | 1 |
| December 2011 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- No one hurt 2 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made Jan 23, 2013, sent to the company Feb 12, 2013, published by CPSC Feb 27, 2013
The product, in the report: Bradley BTIS1 Original Fully Automatic 4-Rack Outdoor Food Smoker (black)
I purchased a Bradley BTIS1 Smoker as a gift in November 2011. We used the smoker twice last summer. The second time we used it, it went up in flames. We cleaned it thoroughly after our first use and monitored it while it was in use. We didn’t try using it again until this past Christmas and needless to say, it didn’t work. I emailed the company but haven’t gotten a response. Our one year warranty has expired so I’m not expecting a replacement. In doing some online research, I have found that several other people have had a similar experience and for safety reasons, I feel this product should be recalled. Had we not been outside when our smoker caught on fire, we could’ve lost more than just the smoker.
- Model
- BTIS1
- Serial number
- 1108009110010228
- Bought from
- Amazon.com
- Bought
- Nov 28, 2011
- Where
- Unspecified: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Unspecified
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- Brand Bradley, made or sold by BRADLEY TECHNOLOGIES CANADA INC
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
-
No one hurt Made Dec 30, 2011, sent to the company Jan 9, 2012, published by CPSC Jan 24, 2012
The product, in the report: 4-rack fully automatic food smoker with 2,288-cubic-inch interior 500-watt cooking element; 125-watt smoking element; heats up to 280 degrees F Unique smoke without fire system features wood-flavored bisquettes that burn for 20 minutes each Runs for up to 8 hours without refueling; tray and drip bowl included; briquettes sold separately Measures 14-1/2 inches by 17 inches by 31 inches; 42 pounds; 1-year warranty
This is in regard to a Bradley BTIS1 Original Fully Automatic 4-Rack Outdoor Food Smoker
Nearly caught my house on fire with this product, and please do note I am not alone, especially lately - check out the customer photos, reviews and their dates on the Amazon.com website: http://www.amazon.com/Bradley-BTIS1-Original-Automatic-Smoker/dp/B000FK2DNM/ref=cm_cr-mr-title
Either this product is too difficult to use safely for most consumers, or I had a defective unit. I really believe it was the latter, but if it’s the former, you’re going to have a hard time keeping this product clean enough to be safe.
I bought this smoker in July (five months ago) and used the product according to directions. On the fifth use, it inexplicably overheated, melting the door seal. There was no fire that time. I contacted Bradley. Bradley sent out a replacement door seal, saying that the only way this can happen is if you improperly keep the vent closed, but they’d help me this time. I hadn’t kept the vent closed, and said I was concerned it was a defective unit and a fire hazard. They continued to assert it must have been a closed vent. I crossed my fingers I had just not noticed my error.
It took me nearly 2 hours to replace the door seal, a dirty job that made me swear to myself I’d maintain the smoker perfectly so there would be no potential of user error going forward. Every single time I removed every single removable part and steel wool clean it. I wiped down the sides each time, and removed any obvious grease.
On about the fifth use after replacement of the door seal, my wife looked out the window just in time - the whole thing was ON FIRE. I unplugged it, doused the fire with water, and finished the turkey breast (not a greasy pork roast mind you, a turkey breast) in the oven.
I called up Bradley immediately, assuming the fire was proof I had a defective unit that would be quickly replaced. I figure, hey, they had a record of the first incident, so it shouldn’t be much of a fuss. Ahem - no. It would have to be reviewed. I was asked to send in photos of the charred remains of the smoker.
After a week of chasing, I finally got to talk to [REDACTED], who is in charge of “fire incidents.” I explained the situation, the previous problem, my exact experience and use of it, and he somehow determined, based only on AFTER photos of the charred remains of the unit that had been doused with water, that it was because of user error - that I hadn’t cleaned the smoker thoroughly enough, and too much grease is why it caught fire. Then he offered me a “deep discount” that he didn’t actually reveal.
I tried to engage him in simple logic. If you’re saying this unit, that has caught fire, is NOT DEFECTIVE, and I’m saying that I’ve used this as responsibly as possible, what you are saying is either A) I am lying to you about how I maintained the product or B) that this product carries a very reasonable risk of a fire starting through normal customer use.
[REDACTED] didn’t really want to say “A” but he essentially did when he refused to acknowledge the possibility of a defective unit. He said the chances of a defect were “slim to zero,” explaining to me about how the components are each inspected before assembly. When I raised the possibility that it had been improperly assembled or perhaps my unit was otherwise defective, and offered to provide the unit to him somehow, he said there was no reason to do so. When I noted that I noticed others on Amazon were also having this issue, he literally laughed and said every product on Amazon has negative reviews from a few people.
This was pretty insulting given the time that I had invested in contacting the company to avoid a repeat of the overheating incident, and my earnest belief that I had used this product right and it was a defective unit. But at that point I realized that any company that would rather call a customer a liar than acknowledge the possibility that it could make a manufacturing error, was not worth a minute more of my time - other than helping assure other people aren’t in my exact situation.
I wish I had taken others’ warnings seriously on the Amazon website and not written them off as being posted by careless people who didn’t bother taking care of the unit properly.
Consumers need to know that this product has the potential to catch fire, even if used very responsibly - and even if you are as careful as I was. I’m not some random Internet troll or someone in desperate need of a refund - I’m a regular suburban father who wouldn’t bother submitting this if it were merely a product that stopped working. This is about starting fires.
- Model
- Bradley BTIS1 Original Fully Automatic 4-Rack Outdoor Food S
- Serial number
- 1103008580010026
- Bought from
- Amazon.com
- Where
- Alexandria, Virginia: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 36, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Bradley, made or sold by BRADLEY TECHNOLOGIES CANADA INC
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.