Hearth Record

Back to Other grills or stoves

Platinum Brunswick other grills or stoves

1 report to CPSC, the latest made May 30, 2023. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • May 30, 2023the latest report was made
  • May 30, 2023the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Platinum Brunswick
Maker
Dansons US LLCMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Other grills or stovesCPSC’s product type: Other Grills or Stoves (code 3233), in Yard & Garden: Grills & Accessories

By month

1 report from June 2022 to May 2023; the most in May 2023, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
May 20231

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made May 30, 2023, sent to the company Jul 6, 2023, published by CPSC Jul 20, 2023

    The product, in the report: Smoker grill

    This consumer has owned a Pitt Boss Platinum Brunswick Wood Pellet Vertical Smoker (smoker) since December 14, 2021. It has been used an estimated 12-15 times since purchase. On two of these uses, the smoker had a serious “burn back” (described below), which resulted in an unreasonable risk of injury to the consumer and damage to personal property. Additionally, throughout the approximate 1.5-year ownership period, there have been repeated structural and mechanical issues. All mechanical and safety issues were promptly reported to the company via the company’s customer service group. In general, the company was responsive to the mechanical issues, providing advice and numerous replacement parts (including controller board, ignitor, temperature probes, and more). An estimated 20-30 hours of labor were required by the consumer to replace parts and make needed repairs (including a malfunctioning door latch and seal). The company was not however, particularly helpful in dealing with the burn-back fire issues (discussed below). Frustrated with the scope, frequency, and severity of problems, the consumer attempted to return the smoker to Walmart (where it was purchased). The return was denied as it was beyond the designated 3 (6?) month return period. The smoker is fueled by wood pellets, which are stored in a large hopper located on the back of the smoker. The pellets are transported internally via a metal auger. It feeds a small fire chamber where the pellets are ignited producing heat and smoke. The burn back hazard is caused when the wood pellets contained inside the auger become so hot they smolder and eventually combust. In a matter of minutes, the fire can back up the auger into the storage hopper causing a serious fire risk. The consumer was able to extinguish the two fires experienced by: removing the pellets in the hopper (which is very difficult and dangerous while burning), unplugging the internal cooling fan (which was making the fire worse), and cutting off all other outside air sources. The consumer was not injured in either incident, nor was personal property significantly damaged. However, this outcome was only due to the fact the consumer was still near the smoker when both fires stared and able to responded quickly to remove fuel and air supply.

    The consumer has followed all stated maintenance and operational guidelines found in company manual/guides, on line, and from customer service representatives. The smoker was thoroughly cleaned after each use, the wood pellets were sifted to remove excessive “dust” (which can clog the auger), and all start-up and shut-down procedures were carefully followed. During the most recent call with company representatives (5/29/23), it was also suggested that “ ... perhaps the consumer(I) just needed to invest in a better more expensive smoker.” (The initial cost of this smoker was $579. 79.) The burn back hazard with this smoker appears to be pervasive. The consumer conducted a very brief search of the Pitt Boss internet forum (key words auger fire, back fire) and found 8 posts in the recent past on similar problems. Some posts indicated serious outcomes. The consumer strongly encourages CPSC investigators to review this and other pertinent information (included past recorded calls between the consumer and Pitt Boss representatives).

    The consumer was told by Pitt Boss customer service staff (5/29/23) that the Platinum Brunswick smoker is still being sold, and that it is not under any type recall. The consumer believes this smoker unit is poorly designed and manufactured as evidenced by the numerous failures experienced. More importantly, the consumer believes this smoker represents a very real, ongoing, and unreasonable risk of injury and damage to property.

    Model
    PBV5PL
    Serial number
    PG105772106486
    Bought from
    received as a gift
    Bought
    Dec 1, 2021, about then
    Where
    Murray, Kentucky: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Platinum Brunswick, made or sold by Dansons US LLC
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Other grills or stoves

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.