Hearth Record

Back to Furnaces

Maxim furnaces

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Jan 24, 2014. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Jan 24, 2014the latest report was made
  • Jan 24, 2014the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Maxim
Maker
Central BoilerMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
FurnacesCPSC’s product type: Furnaces, Other or Not Specified (code 322), in Home Maintenance and Structures: Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning

By month

1 report from February 2013 to January 2014; the most in January 2014, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
January 20141

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Jan 24, 2014, sent to the company Feb 3, 2014, published by CPSC Feb 19, 2014

    The product, in the report: Central Boiler Maxim M250 wood pellet boiler. www.maximheat.com

    On 8/19/2011, I bought a Central Boiler Maxim M250, serial #M00377 from [REDACTED], Frontier Heating Concepts Inc. On 11/7/13 the product caused a serious fire that destroyed the boiler and threatened structures and personal belongings at my home. The fire originated in the boiler and was contained by the metal enclosure. After extinguishing the fire, I contacted the Central Boiler dealer, [REDACTED], who came to my home and took pictures. An investigation was not performed. Pictures of the boiler were sent to Central Boiler (CB) on 11/8/13. I made inquiries about the fire through the dealer on 11/13, 11/20 and 12/4 with no reply from CB to that point. On 12/4, [REDACTED] instructed me to contact the dealer directly. I sent an e-mail inquiry to [REDACTED] of CB on 12/12/13. [REDACTED] replied on 12/16, briefly explaining that a determination was made from photo’s that the fire was caused by lack of maintenance and that damage would not be covered by the furnace warranty. I replied to [REDACTED] the same day, stating that recommended maintenance was thoroughly performed just prior to the fire and that close examination of the boiler would affirm that. [REDACTED] has not replied to this message that was sent more than two months ago. I sent an additional e-mail to [REDACTED] on 1/2/13 to ask if he would explain the sequence of events he believed would occur from lack of maintenance that would cause a catastrophic failure and fire. I also asked if the Maxim M250 has any engineered features or safeguards to prevent fire from occurring outside the burn chamber? If yes, I asked if he would explain what those features are and how they work? [REDACTED] has not replied to this message that was sent three weeks ago. At this point, attempts to resolve this with the manufacturer are being repeatedly ignored. I believe this fire resulted from a failure to regulate temperature. The Maxim M250 is a pellet boiler comprised of a 90-gallon water tank surrounding the burn chamber. During normal operation, when the thermostat calls for heat, pellets are automatically introduced to the burn chamber by a feed auger accompanied by fan-forced air. As the fire intensifies and the water temperature rises to a set point (180°), thermostatic control ceases both pellet and air introduction to the burn chamber and the boiler idles down until another call for heat occurs. During suppression of this fire with a dry-chem extinguisher, it was found that the furnace had boiled dry as evidenced by large amounts of water on the concrete floor where it is installed. This was confirmed by physically examining the water tank. Additionally, areas around the water jacket are the most heavily charred, indicating an area of origin. Fire eventually burned through auger feed tubes to the pellet hopper and heat caused a propane regulator to fail which then resulted in fire damage to the electronic controls compartment. If a thermostat or other burn cycle controller were to fail, tank water would heat to the boiling point and much of it be forcefully ejected from the fill port. As the burn cycle continues, remaining water would escape as steam and the steel water tank itself would heat to the point that foam insulation surrounding chars and burns. Extremely hot metal will conduct heat to ultimately affect anything that is either combustible or can melt. Evidence and examination of the boiler suggest an overheat condition that eventually led to a fire that involved several major boiler components. This product is installed in an outbuilding that in addition to the boiler and pellet fuel contains other combustible materials. If the fire had not been noticed when it was, the outbuilding could have been involved in fire which then may have threatened my home as well. I consider this a grave life-safety concern.

    Model
    Maxim M250
    Serial number
    M200377
    Bought from
    Frontier Heating Concepts Inc.
    Bought
    Aug 19, 2011
    Where
    Palmer, Alaska: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 51, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Maxim, made or sold by Central Boiler
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Furnaces

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.