Hearth Record

Back to Gas stoves and ovens

Southbend gas stoves and ovens

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Feb 4, 2012. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Feb 4, 2012the latest report was made
  • Feb 4, 2012the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Southbend
Maker
SOUTHBEND, A MIDDLEBY CORPORATION COMPANYMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Gas stoves and ovensCPSC’s product type: Gas Ranges or Ovens (code 279), in Kitchen: Appliances

By month

1 report from March 2011 to February 2012; the most in February 2012, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
February 20121

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Feb 4, 2012, sent to the company Feb 13, 2012, published by CPSC Feb 28, 2012

    The product, in the report: Gas range

    Consumer Product Safety Commission

    Report on [REDACTED]’s stove, filed 2.4.12

    Re: Southbend “Ultimate Range” 4601DD-2GR (serial no. 11G295080), purchased by the [REDACTED] ([REDACTED]) in July 2011

    It is virtually impossible to determine whether all six pilot lights under the heavy griddle have been lit by the electronic igniters. There are not sufficient sighting ports on the front panel of the range for determining whether the pilot lights have been lit. Two of the three ports that are included in the front panel have stainless-steel plates behind them blocking the sight line. These plates were obviously installed to block any unusually large flame spread from moving through the port and toward the operator’s face.

    There’s something of a Catch-22 in this range design. The designers included ports in the front panel so the operator could verify that the pilot lights are lit. But then this presented a problem with any dangerous flame spread or surge. Plates were then added—just as they were decades ago for water heaters—to stop any large (and dangerous) flame surge from reaching the operator. The addition of anti-flame-surge plates, which are difficult to remove, makes it impossible for the operator to see all the pilot lights. In the case of the water heater, at least up till recently, the operator could remove and reinstall the anti-flame-surge plate.

    Further, the electronic igniters on this model are reliably temperamental. Sometimes they light the pilot gas, and sometimes they don’t. We’ve had service technicians, from TWC in Atlanta, out twice to work on the igniters of this stove, which is under warranty by Southbend until July 2012. Two days after a visit from a technician we found that some of the igniters were not working.

    The TWC technicians have confirmed five concerns which I initially raised with Southbend upon my early, thorough examination of the stove:

    1. The igniters are inconsistent in operation. Pushing the igniter button on the stove front doesn’t ensure that the pilot lights under the griddle are fired. The probability of their being fired is not very high, because the igniter electrodes are sensitive to exact alignment with the flow of gas from the pilot light hole in the pilot manifold. Heating and cooling cycles surely affect this alignment in negative way.

    2. Notwithstanding what the instruction manual says about lifting the griddle to verify that the pilot lights are lit, the grill is too heavy and too unwieldy to lift. It weighs over 60 pounds and there are no hand-holes in it. It is not possible for one person to lift it to verify that the pilot lights, underneath, are lit. It would take two people to lift the griddle, and even this would be dangerous.

    3. When all six pilots are lit—after two people have removed the griddle, confirmed that the pilots are lit, and then replaced the griddle—the sighting ports in the front panel allow a clear visual check of only two of the pilots. One other pilot can barely be seen. The other three cannot be seen at all.

    4. Two of the pilot light tubes can easily be reached with a long match in the event the igniters are known to be in total failure. One pilot can be reached with much difficulty. Three pilots cannot be reached at all. They are blocked by the anti-flame-surge plates.

    5. Unlit pilot lights under the griddle—when the main gas valve on the stove is open, allowing gas flow to all pilot light tubes—allow for a dangerous condition: the buildup of raw gas.

    On behalf of the [REDACTED], I’ve talked with Southbend Customer Service and with Southbend Technical Support. From these two departments I have received nothing helpful on the five concerns. There is uncertainty at Southbend on why there are not clear sight lines to all six pilots under the griddle. I have written to the president of Southbend about this matter. The company has not provided a satisfactory answer to my questions. The VP of Engineering told me last September that we could remove the plates blocking the sight lines. A design engineer with the company had said, weeks earlier, that we must not remove these plates. The Atlanta company that sold us the stove, Atlanta Fixtures, has not been helpful.

    Model
    4601DD-2GR
    Serial number
    11G295080
    Bought from
    Atlanta Fixtures
    Bought
    Jan 2, 2012, about then
    Where
    Atlanta, Georgia: Other
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Southbend, made or sold by SOUTHBEND, A MIDDLEBY CORPORATION COMPANY
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Gas stoves and ovens

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.