Hearth Record

Back to Juicers

Hamilton Beach juicers

3 reports to CPSC, the latest made Apr 20, 2017. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 3reports to CPSC
  • Apr 20, 2017the latest report was made
  • Mar 16, 2012the earliest
  • 3with the company’s comments
Brand
Hamilton Beach
Maker
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
JuicersCPSC’s product type: Juicers (code 271), in Kitchen: Appliances

By month

1 report from May 2016 to April 2017; the most in April 2017, 1. 2 earlier reports, since March 2012, are in the table.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
April 20171
January 20131
March 20121

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 3 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Apr 20, 2017, sent to the company Aug 2, 2017, published by CPSC Aug 16, 2017

    The product, in the report: Big Mouth Juice Extractor

    The submitter used the juice extractor on April 9 at approximately 7pm.

    On April 10, the submitter said he used the microwave to heat up milk for his daughter. The submitter and his family got ready and left the apartment as part of their Monday morning routine. He said the juice extractor was still plugged into the wall along with the microwave. The submitter said the microwave was not damaged from the fire and the outlet was not burned.

    A few hours later the submitter was notified that his apartment caught fire and he rushed to the scene. The submitter said once he arrived the fire department had put out the fire. He said the fire investigator provided him with the fire report (incident # 2017-004438) which states that the fire was caused from the juice extractor and the cause of ignition is unintentional.

    The submitter said his dog was in the apartment when the fire took place and his dog has smoke inhalation. The submitter made an itemized list of items lost during the fire and he states that it is approximately $50,000.

    On April 11, the submitter contacted the firm and informed them of the incident. The firm requested a copy of the fire departments report and he sent the firm a copy. The firm also told the submitter to leave the fire scene untouched. On April 17, the firm sent out [REDACTED], with SEA Limited to examine the fire scene. The submitter said [REDACTED]reconstructed the fire and sent his findings to the firm. The submitter said [REDACTED] was unwilling to provide his findings to the submitter per the firm’s instructions. The submitter asked the firm for a copy of the findings but they told him that it was the firm’s work and they wouldn’t provide it to him.

    The firm has also requested the submitter mail the juice extractor and the microwave which was next to the juice extractor. The firm has emailed the submitter the mailing labels but the submitter would rather have CPSC or a third party examine the juice extractor.

    The submitter believes the juice extractor poses a fire hazard and should be recalled.

    The submitter said the firm has not mentioned any assistance with compensation for his property damage.

    Model
    67601A Big Mouth Juice Extractor
    UPC
    Unknown
    Serial number
    E0241ATJ
    Bought from
    www.amazon.com
    Bought
    Aug 5, 2016
    Where
    Yonkers, New York: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Hamilton Beach, made or sold by Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  2. No one hurt

    Made Jan 30, 2013, sent to the company Feb 28, 2013, published by CPSC Mar 15, 2013

    The product, in the report: Juicer

    Caller is reporting his Juicer that was sent to him by the manufacturer around September 26th, 2009 as the remedy for his juicer that had been recalled with release# 02-041. He had no problems with the replacement juicer until January 28th, 2013 when he was using the juicer, he heard a loud pop and noted that the juicer “jumped” a bit then the top portion of the plastic clamp which is used to hold the top portion of the unit in place to the bottom portion. A piece of plastic went shooting past his head. He is reporting because if the piece of plastic had hit his eye or throat etc. he or anyone standing near him could have been severely injured.

    He contacted the manufacturer 01/28/2013, notified that his juicer is not one recall, not on warranty but that they would be happy to provide him with a 30 day only offer for another juicer at only 50% cost to him.

    No injuries have been reported.

    Model
    67600
    Serial number
    C4180ATT
    Bought from
    Remedy for recalled product, California
    Bought
    Sep 26, 2009, about then
    Where
    Studio City, California: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    made or sold by Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  3. No one hurt

    Made Mar 16, 2012, sent to the company May 11, 2012, published by CPSC May 25, 2012

    The product, in the report: Hamilton Beach Juice Extractor

    The consumer wanted to express her concerns about her juicer as the a piece of the product very nearly struck her in the eye and the product began to smoke. The consumer was in the process of juicing carrots and apples in the upper portion of the juicer. While the consumer was holding down the juicer, one of the two plastic flaps on the top panel of the juice broke and the debris went up in the direction of the consumer. The plastic flap struck the consumer in the face, startling but not injuring her.

    The product continued to juice on its own for nearly another 20-30 seconds, the product began to smoke. The consumer unplugged the juicer from the outlet. By design, the 2 plastic flaps are on opposite sides of the juicer. The consumer did not call the retailer as she is not sure of who they are. The consumer also did not find it necessary to call the fire department or her home insurance company.

    The consumer called the firm 2 days ago about the incident and was told they could not help her as the product is out of warranty. The consumer stated that there was no damage to the structure of her home.

    Model
    67601
    Serial number
    C1990ATT
    Bought from
    Gift
    Where
    Atlanta, Georgia: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Hamilton Beach, made or sold by Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Juicers

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.