Hearth Record

Back to Electric mixers

Wolf Gourmet electric mixers

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Dec 15, 2025. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Dec 15, 2025the latest report was made
  • Dec 15, 2025the earliest
  • 1with the company’s comments
Brand
Wolf Gourmet
Maker
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Electric mixersCPSC’s product type: Electric Mixers (code 231), in Kitchen: Appliances

By month

1 report from January 2025 to December 2025; the most in December 2025, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
December 20251

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No incident, no one hurt 1 CPSC: No Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No incident, no one hurt

    Made Dec 15, 2025, sent to the company Dec 22, 2025, published by CPSC Jan 9, 2026

    The product, in the report: It is a Wolf Gourmet, large, high end stand mixer, Model WGSM100S

    I sent the following message to Wolf Gourmet on 8 Dec ‘25:

    Hi Folks,

    This is the follow-up to my earlier call today concerning a potential safety issue with a loose/broken handle on a Wolf 7-Quart Mixing Bowl. The background:

    My wife has had a Wolf Gourmet WGSM100S for several years and loves it! (Atch. 1) She is an accomplished cook and baker who probably uses the mixer at least once a week. On 26 November, while doing some holiday baking she commented to me that the “handle seems loose”. I looked and sure enough it was not only loose, but a slight movement by me caused the upper ‘attachment point’ to separate completely from the bowl! Atch. 2 is the photo I took at that time while Atch. 3 is another photo I took today to more clearly show the problem. BTW, the bottom ‘attachment point’ is also loose but not yet totally separated. It appears to me that there is some kind of “screw mechanism” holding the handle to the bowl but no obvious way of “tightening” it back on.

    I don’t think the handle should fall apart. Do you? I believe this is a potential safety issue. If my wife was lifting off the heavy mixer bowl when the handle failed, she could have been injured. I told her to stop using it and I called you folks, but after 10 minutes of waiting gave up. Since she had lots more baking to do, I chose to immediately order an expensive ($263.95) replacement bowl. (Atch. 4) rather than deal with a potential safety problem. It arrived via UPS on 5 December and is working fine!

    I’m not exactly sure when we bought the mixer but we still have the actual carton it came in. Atch. 5 is from that carton and shows a “copyright of 2019” so I suspect our unit may have been bought in 2019/2020. Thus, it is probably beyond the 5 year warranty period but I’m not sure this really applies in our case. If we hadn’t noticed the failure when we did and stopped using the bowl at that time, the results could have been much worse. Therefore, I am respectively asking that you consider refunding the $263.95 I paid for the replacement bowl. BTW, I still have the original “failed” bowl should you be interested in examining it. Thank you very much and we look forward to your reply.

    [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

    They replied with this bland message: [REDACTED] (Wolf Gourmet Support)

    Dec 9, 2025, [REDACTED] EST

    [REDACTED],

    Thank you for your email.

    Unfortunately, there is no way to repair/tighten the handle on the bowl.

    With the appliance showing it is outside of the 5 year limited warranty we will be unable to replace the bowl.

    We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience

    Thank you for contacting Wolf Gourmet

    [REDACTED] Consumer Affairs

    I then sent this reply back:

    [REDACTED],

    Interesting and disappointing. You completely ignored my central issue that Wolf has a SAFETY issue that could result in injury to your customers. I thought perhaps some “thank you for pointing this out” would result and maybe even as a gesture of customer goodwill reimburse me for having to buy a replacement bowl. You do acknowledge “Unfortunately, there is no way to repair/tighten the handle on the bowl” which implies a design deficiency. Bottom line, it appears that Wolf is more interested in quibbling over details rather than addressing a potential problem. So be it. Perhaps I will share this story with [REDACTED] and the Consumer Product Safety Commsision to see how they view the issue. Please reconsider your decision.

    There has been no further word from them. I can understand them not wanting to reimburse me for buying s new bowl, but cannot understand them ignoring a potential safety issue. I don’t know if you have previous reports on this, but if I hadn’t intervened, my wife could have been injured when the handle suddenly separated. Thank you.

    [REDACTED]

    Model
    WGSM100S
    UPC
    4009493954
    Serial number
    unknown
    Bought from
    online years ago
    Bought
    Dec 31, 2018, about then
    Where
    PRESCOTT, Arizona: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 83, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Spouse
    As this report names them
    Brand Wolf Gourmet, made or sold by Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    No Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Electric mixers

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.