Hearth Record

Back to Liquid drugs

Be Natural Callus Eliminator liquid drugs

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Oct 19, 2015. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Oct 19, 2015the latest report was made
  • Oct 19, 2015the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Be Natural Callus Eliminator
Maker
American International IndustriesMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Liquid drugsCPSC’s product type: Liquid Drugs (code 1927), in Toys & Children: Drug & Cosmetic Poisonings to Children Under 5

By month

1 report from November 2014 to October 2015; the most in October 2015, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
October 20151

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Hospital admission 1 CPSC: Injury, Hospital Admission

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Hospital admission

    Made Oct 19, 2015, sent to the company Oct 29, 2015, published by CPSC Nov 13, 2015

    The product, in the report: This product is designed to remove foot calluses. The active ingredient appears to be Potassium Hydroxide. Per the MSD sheet it has a Potassium Hydroxide concentration of less than 20% and pH of 13-14. I do not know the actual KOH concentration by volume.

    On 6/9/2015 a 12 month old female ingested a small volume of “Be Natural Callus Eliminator” manufactured by ProLinc in the family home and developed a distal esophageal caustic stricture that has required 4 endoscopic stricture dilations. The active ingredient in the product is Potassium Hydroxide with a concentration of less than 20% and pH of 13-14 per the MSD sheet (according to poison control office). The family reports that the over the counter product was on a living room coffee table with the cap on. The cap is a twist non-safety cap. The child climbed onto the couch to get it and the child was biting the cap when it came off. The amount of possible ingestion was unclear but estimated to be less than 1 teaspoon. The child became fussy. The family called the Northern New England Poison Control Center 207-662-4720 and was told to be seen at a local emergency department. The child initially calmed down and fell asleep at home but awoke crying. The child was seen in the early morning on 6/10/15 at the Central Maine Medical Center ED. There were no visible oral burns and the child was discharged, able to take PO. The patient developed progressive solid food dysphagia over the course of approximately the next 10 days. The child had an Upper GI Contrast study performed locally on 6/22/15 in Maine which demonstrated a distal esophageal stricture. The child developed progressive dysphagia and on 7/6/15 she presented to the Boston Children’s Hospital ED with inability to tolerate purees and even inability to tolerate liquids ingested quickly with vomiting. She was admitted. I performed an upper endoscopy on 7/7/2015 which demonstrated a tight distal esophageal stricture with inner diameter of 2mm. The stricture was located 5mm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction as was consistent with a caustic stricture. Proximal retained esophageal food impaction was removed and the stricture was dilated to 8mm. She was discharged on 7/7/2015. I have since performed 3 additional outpatient esophageal dilations on this patient on: 7/22/15, 8/14/2015, and 10/15/2015 with progressive improvement in dysphagia.

    I contacted the Northern New England Poison Control Center 207-662-4720 on 10/16/2015 again and spoke with [REDACTED] there. I was informed that they have had an additional case of caustic ingestion with this same Potassium Hydroxide based Callus Remover. The brand was reported to be different but the manufacturer was the same. [REDACTED]informed me that she spoke with a representative from the manufacturer following both ingestion cases. I was informed that the second case involved a 14 month old girl who ingested the product at home and had an upper endoscopy performed which showed: circumferential moderate to severe burns to the upper third of the esophagus. Exposure was on 8/15 or 8/16/2015.

    I am unaware if there have been additional cases of caustic ingestion with this product nationally or internationally. There is no prior literature on caustic ingestion with this specifict product that I can find. I am concened because it appears to me that this product previously had been accessible mainly in salons or podiatrist offices but is now readily available to consumers over the counter (i.e. on amazon.com). The lack of very obvious ingestion warning signs on the bottle and the lack of a safety cap are additional major concerns.

    I will try to obtain contact information for the GI provider of this second case and request that they also report their case to CPSC.

    Please do not hesitate to contact me for further information.

    Where
    Winthrop, Maine: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Client, Patient, Student, Etc. (professional relationship)
    As this report names them
    Brand Be Natural Callus Eliminator, made or sold by American International Industries
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Hospital Admission

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Liquid drugs

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.