Sharpie pens and pencils
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Oct 27, 2018. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Oct 27, 2018the latest report was made
- Oct 27, 2018the earliest
- 1with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Sharpie
- Maker
- Newell Rubbermaid Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Pens and pencilsCPSC’s product type: Pens and Pencils (code 1685), in Furniture, Furnishings & Decorations: Office Supplies
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| October 2018 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Oct 27, 2018, sent to the company Nov 5, 2018, published by CPSC Nov 20, 2018
The product, in the report: sharpie alcohol based permanent maker fine line black
I have been told by Duke University who tests ACMI products for the AP seal that their assumption of “normal use” for a Sharpie alcohol-based permanent marking pen is for one person drawing approximately 10 inches once per day. However, schools have noted the AP seal on the package and no definition of “normal use” is included on the package. My daughter’s school is using the product as a classroom art supply, to be used by up to 20 students in a session to draw art projects, polluting the air beyond normal use as was tested for in marginally ventilated classrooms (no cross ventilation present for example). When I called the Sharpie corp. customer service line I was told by three representatives that 20 5 year olds using the pens for art in a classroom is considered “normal use”, which is not true and apparently putting children at risk.
Duke University testing staff sent the following to me. I see CPSC ran a test with them studying classroom use, but I don’t see the study listed on your website. What are your conclusions regarding classroom use safety per the study?
My daughter, who only gets a headache when she is very ill, had a headache and burning eyes after being exposed to the pens in a Kindergarten classroom art project in September 2018 at White Oak Elementary School in Westlake Village. Another child also experienced burnings eyes at that time.
Exposure Study Summary We evaluated solvent exposure to professional graphic artists who were using both solvent- containing spray fixatives and xylene-containing markers. The 8 hour time weighted average exposures to xylene to 15 artists using these markers ranged from 0.006 to 0.54 ppm. Only those artists who used solvent-containing aerosols had excessive symptoms of narcosis and mucous membrane irritation. In a second study done in conjunction with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), we evaluated exposures to white board marker solvents from use of markers containing methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) and n-butyl acetate (NBA). CPSC specifically chose the markers for these studies after reviewing generic formulations for whiteboard markers certified by ACMI. Two exposure studies were done in poorly ventilated (0.5 air changes per hour) rooms: an unventilated 230 m 3 room and a 237 m 3 ventilated classroom. Markers were used for 30 minutes. Samples were taken for 30 minutes at the breathing zone and for 3.5 hours at a background location, 4 m from the work area after marker use had ended. One, 3 or 4 users worked with markers in the unventilated room. 1, 2 or 4 users worked with markers in the ventilated school room. The dilutional ventilation equation was used to determine background exposures associated with use of these markers by 25 users. In the unventilated room, personal MIBK exposures during 30 minutes of use ranged from 0.87 to 1.75 ppm and background exposures ranged from 0.37-0.93 ppm depending on the number of users. For the n-butyl acetate component, personal exposures during 30 minutes of use ranged from 0.21-0.27 ppm and background exposures ranged from <0.06-0.23 ppm depending on the number of users. Using the dilutional ventilation equation to project exposures where there would be 25 users in an unventilated room, the expected maximum 4 hour average exposure would be 5.3 ppm for MIBK and 2.0 ppm for NBA. In a classroom setting the expected maximum 4 hour average exposure would be 4.1 ppm for MIBK and 1.6 ppm for NBA. Reference ([REDACTED]). See Pertinent Toxicological Issues: Solvent-Based Markers.
- Model
- sharpie permanent maker fine line black | Model #: 30051
- Serial number
- Item #: 507130 | Model #: 30051
- Bought from
- Office Depot or Office Max in California
- Bought
- Aug 1, 2018, about then
- Where
- Westlake Village, California: School
- Who was involved
- Age 5, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand Sharpie, made or sold by Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.