Hearth Record

Back to Pens and pencils

Sharpie pens and pencils

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Oct 27, 2018. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Oct 27, 2018the latest report was made
  • Oct 27, 2018the earliest
  • 1with the company’s comments
Brand
Sharpie
Maker
Newell Rubbermaid Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Pens and pencilsCPSC’s product type: Pens and Pencils (code 1685), in Furniture, Furnishings & Decorations: Office Supplies

By month

1 report from November 2017 to October 2018; the most in October 2018, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
October 20181

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Oct 27, 2018, sent to the company Nov 5, 2018, published by CPSC Nov 20, 2018

    The product, in the report: sharpie alcohol based permanent maker fine line black

    I have been told by Duke University who tests ACMI products for the AP seal that their assumption of “normal use” for a Sharpie alcohol-based permanent marking pen is for one person drawing approximately 10 inches once per day. However, schools have noted the AP seal on the package and no definition of “normal use” is included on the package. My daughter’s school is using the product as a classroom art supply, to be used by up to 20 students in a session to draw art projects, polluting the air beyond normal use as was tested for in marginally ventilated classrooms (no cross ventilation present for example). When I called the Sharpie corp. customer service line I was told by three representatives that 20 5 year olds using the pens for art in a classroom is considered “normal use”, which is not true and apparently putting children at risk.

    Duke University testing staff sent the following to me. I see CPSC ran a test with them studying classroom use, but I don’t see the study listed on your website. What are your conclusions regarding classroom use safety per the study?

    My daughter, who only gets a headache when she is very ill, had a headache and burning eyes after being exposed to the pens in a Kindergarten classroom art project in September 2018 at White Oak Elementary School in Westlake Village. Another child also experienced burnings eyes at that time.

    Exposure Study Summary We evaluated solvent exposure to professional graphic artists who were using both solvent- containing spray fixatives and xylene-containing markers. The 8 hour time weighted average exposures to xylene to 15 artists using these markers ranged from 0.006 to 0.54 ppm. Only those artists who used solvent-containing aerosols had excessive symptoms of narcosis and mucous membrane irritation. In a second study done in conjunction with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), we evaluated exposures to white board marker solvents from use of markers containing methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) and n-butyl acetate (NBA). CPSC specifically chose the markers for these studies after reviewing generic formulations for whiteboard markers certified by ACMI. Two exposure studies were done in poorly ventilated (0.5 air changes per hour) rooms: an unventilated 230 m 3 room and a 237 m 3 ventilated classroom. Markers were used for 30 minutes. Samples were taken for 30 minutes at the breathing zone and for 3.5 hours at a background location, 4 m from the work area after marker use had ended. One, 3 or 4 users worked with markers in the unventilated room. 1, 2 or 4 users worked with markers in the ventilated school room. The dilutional ventilation equation was used to determine background exposures associated with use of these markers by 25 users. In the unventilated room, personal MIBK exposures during 30 minutes of use ranged from 0.87 to 1.75 ppm and background exposures ranged from 0.37-0.93 ppm depending on the number of users. For the n-butyl acetate component, personal exposures during 30 minutes of use ranged from 0.21-0.27 ppm and background exposures ranged from <0.06-0.23 ppm depending on the number of users. Using the dilutional ventilation equation to project exposures where there would be 25 users in an unventilated room, the expected maximum 4 hour average exposure would be 5.3 ppm for MIBK and 2.0 ppm for NBA. In a classroom setting the expected maximum 4 hour average exposure would be 4.1 ppm for MIBK and 1.6 ppm for NBA. Reference ([REDACTED]). See Pertinent Toxicological Issues: Solvent-Based Markers.

    Model
    sharpie permanent maker fine line black | Model #: 30051
    Serial number
    Item #: 507130 | Model #: 30051
    Bought from
    Office Depot or Office Max in California
    Bought
    Aug 1, 2018, about then
    Where
    Westlake Village, California: School
    Who was involved
    Age 5, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Sharpie, made or sold by Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Pens and pencils

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.