Hearth Record

Back to Pacifiers and teething rings

Sassy Kinsley Boutique pacifiers and teething rings

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Aug 5, 2016. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Aug 5, 2016the latest report was made
  • Aug 5, 2016the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Sassy Kinsley Boutique
Maker
Sassy Kinsley BoutiqueMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Pacifiers and teething ringsCPSC’s product type: Pacifiers or Teething Rings (code 1525), in Baby: Nursery Equipment & Supplies

By month

1 report from September 2015 to August 2016; the most in August 2016, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
August 20161

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No incident, no one hurt 1 CPSC: No Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No incident, no one hurt

    Made Aug 5, 2016, sent to the company Sep 2, 2016, published by CPSC Sep 26, 2016

    The product, in the report: Rhinestone Pacifier

    There is a company called SassyKinsley Boutique web: http://www.sassykinsley.bigcartel.com/ instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sassykinsleyboutique (with a following of over 50k). On her instagram account she has several pictures of babies with the pacifiers in their mouths. I inquired about the safety of the product. The business owner informed me via message that she purchases pacifiers from Toys R Us and then uses non-toxic glue to adhere rhinestones to the front of the pacifiers. After some research, I informed her that these types of pacifiers had been recalled in 2007 due to the choking hazard. After this message she “blocked” me so that I could not contact her via message on Instagram. I reached out to her via e-mail expressing my disbelief that she would blatantly ignore the information I provided. She responded by stating that she has a disclaimer on her website that states “buyer assumes all risk” and that the pacifiers are “novelty items not intended for actual use” she went on to say if a parent gives to their child then that’s up to them. However, under this same disclaimer that she refers to it states “All sales final due to the nature of the product being intended for use by babies.” Further, on her Instagram she markets the pacifiers as intended for child use - she has many photos of babies with the pacifier in their mouths. Her posts even state “safe for baby.” I pointed this information out to her and she has since edited her posts to remove the ‘safe for baby” but the photos of babies using the pacifiers remain. I have a screen shot of the original photos that can be submitted to your office for review. I also have screen shots of the website statement indicating the product is intend for use by baby. The business owners name is [REDACTED]. Her e-mail is [REDACTED]. This should be investigated promptly to ensure the safety of our children. Thank you.

    Model
    Rhinestone Pacifier
    Where
    Unspecified: Other
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Sassy Kinsley Boutique, made or sold by Sassy Kinsley Boutique
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    No Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Pacifiers and teething rings

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.