Hearth Record

Back to Pacifiers and teething rings

Qualeap Amber pacifiers and teething rings

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Aug 23, 2021. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Aug 23, 2021the latest report was made
  • Aug 23, 2021the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Qualeap Amber
Maker
Qualeap Co., LtdMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Pacifiers and teething ringsCPSC’s product type: Pacifiers or Teething Rings (code 1525), in Baby: Nursery Equipment & Supplies

By month

1 report from September 2020 to August 2021; the most in August 2021, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
August 20211

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Aug 23, 2021, sent to the company Apr 26, 2022, published by CPSC May 10, 2022

    The product, in the report: Product URL: [REDACTED] Pink dinosaur teether with a string of beads as a pacifier clip. Advertised as 3months+. The teether was advertised as being ‘chewable beads’. Amazon webpage indicates small part warning/choking hazard but none of the actual packaging for the product does, so if gifted to individuals like it was to us, it can be risky. We used our own judgment to deem it unsafe and got rid of it, but I worry for other families. I don’t like the misleading packaging and I do not think such a product should be marketed at babies if it poses such a choking hazard.

    We were gifted a silicone teether toy that a person purchased from Amazon. The seller/manufacturer is Qualeap Amber. The Amazon ASIN is B07QVJNF3C. Item Model is L-DINO-PINK.

    I am reporting this because I noticed the pacifier clip is a potential choking hazard. A bunch of small beads that a baby can choke on are on a fragile looking string. It was because of this that my husband and I disposed of the whole toy. We never used the clip but did use the actual teether and no injuries occurred.

    We are reporting this because of the following: 1. Misleading packaging and product information. Packaging indicates 3 months+, and no choking hazard/small parts warnings were on the packaging, but there is a small parts warning present on the Amazon page as of 8/22/21 (again, we were gifted this item so we did not see the warning until looking on Amazon) 2. Other customer reviews on Amazon indicated the beads broke free and posed choking hazards to their children. This information scared us, and we thought it was best to report the product as the item is still for sale on Amazon and no changes to the packaging, product information, or advertising appears evident.

    Model
    ?L-DINO-PINK
    Serial number
    ASIN: B07QVJNF3C
    Bought from
    Amazon.com
    Where
    Bittersweet Street NW, Minnesota: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unknown
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Qualeap Amber, made or sold by Qualeap Co., Ltd
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Pacifiers and teething rings

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.