Hearth Record

Back to Pacifiers and teething rings

IDEAL DISTRIBUTORS INC pacifiers and teething rings

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Aug 5, 2011. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Aug 5, 2011the latest report was made
  • Aug 5, 2011the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
None given: no report names a brand, so the group is named for its maker, IDEAL DISTRIBUTORS INC
Maker
IDEAL DISTRIBUTORS INCMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Pacifiers and teething ringsCPSC’s product type: Pacifiers or Teething Rings (code 1525), in Baby: Nursery Equipment & Supplies

By month

1 report from September 2010 to August 2011; the most in August 2011, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
August 20111

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Hospital admission 1 CPSC: Injury, Hospital Admission

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Hospital admission

    Made Aug 5, 2011, sent to the company Sep 13, 2011, published by CPSC Oct 4, 2011

    The product, in the report: a pacifier

    The five month old victim was given the pacifier (the amount of time the victim had the pacifier is unknown) and the nipple portion of the pacifier detached causing the infant to swallow the nipple.

    The infant began to vomit immediatley and his parents took the infant to Providence Hospital in Hood River Oregon. The hospital staff sent the victim home and advised the victim’s mother to monitor him and give him minimum milk and to check for fever and diarrhea.

    The victim’s mother noticed that the victim continued to vomit and there were no s so she made an appointment for the infant to see his primary care physician on 8/1/2011.

    On 8/1/2011 the victim was taken to Primary Care Physician at La Clinica Del Carinno Family Health Care center where the victim’s primary care doctor ([REDACTED]) advised the consumer to take the victim to Oregon Health Science University in Portland Oregon (OHSU is a college and hospital) ER.

    The victim was taken to OHSU on 8/1/2011 where the doctor (doctor’s name was not provided performed x-rays and various different assessments and advised the victim’s mother that a surgery known as a bowel abstract to remove the nipple. The victim underwent the surgery and was release from OHSU on 8/4/2011 with a recommendation to follow up with his Primary Care Doctor within a few days.

    The medical assistant whom filed the report stated that the parents purchased the pacifier from Juanita’s Market in Hood River, OR, where she also went in and purchased the same pacifier herself. She went home and did some research online and noticed a recall involving the pacifiers (see Release #06-043) she is not sure if the pacifier involved in the incident was one affected by the recall.

    No further information was provided and when the Medical Assistant receives the report she will add more information.

    Bought from
    Juanito Markets
    Where
    Hood River, Oregon: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    made or sold by IDEAL DISTRIBUTORS INC
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Hospital Admission

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Pacifiers and teething rings

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.