Hearth Record

Back to Baby rattles

Skip hop baby rattles

2 reports to CPSC, the latest made Dec 13, 2017. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 2reports to CPSC
  • Dec 13, 2017the latest report was made
  • Sep 28, 2016the earliest
  • 2with the company’s comments
Brand
Skip hop
Maker
Skip Hop, Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Baby rattlesCPSC’s product type: Baby Rattles (code 1517), in Toys & Children: Toys
Other ways the reports write the brand (1)

“Skip hop explore & more roll around cradle toy”

By month

1 report from January 2017 to December 2017; the most in December 2017, 1. 1 earlier report, since September 2016, is in the table.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
December 20171
September 20161

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 2 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Dec 13, 2017, sent to the company Mar 5, 2018, published by CPSC Mar 19, 2018

    The product, in the report: Cradle Toy

    Caller is reporting that her 12 month old child was playing with the rattle and the arm became detached causing the beads to fall out, the child was able to get the bead in her mouth, however, caller was able to retrieve it before it became a choking hazard.

    The manufacturer was contacted and they informed her that they would escalate the issue and would send a prepaid label for her to return it. She stated that she inquire of them how they would were going to make the product safer for children but they were unable to give her a response.

    Caller is concerned that if this product is not taken off the shelves many children will be injured.

    Model
    unknown
    Bought from
    Amazon.com
    Where
    Chagrin Falls, Ohio: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Skip hop explore & more roll around cradle toy, made or sold by Skip Hop, Inc.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  2. No one hurt

    Made Sep 28, 2016, sent to the company Nov 23, 2016, published by CPSC Dec 8, 2016

    The product, in the report: Explore and more roll around toy, bee. Small toy intended for infants to grasp and chew on.

    Skip hop Explore and more roll around toy, bee version. I’ve had this toy for a few months and today my baby was playing with it in his car seat. My three year old told me the toy was broken so I stopped and looked at the toy and the wings part that holds two beads on it had broken. One of the beads was missing and I couldn’t find it but I don’t think my baby swallowed it. The beads are a definite choking hazard. I looked on Amazon at the reviews and this isn’t the first time this has happened. I am so glad my baby was ok because he easily could have choked on one of the beads!!

    Bought from
    Amazon.com
    Bought
    Jul 11, 2016
    Where
    Florida: Street or Highway
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Skip hop, made or sold by Skip Hop, Inc.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Baby rattles

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.